Romney to cut 280,000 Jobs. Just ask him.

Only 200,000 cuts? Hell, he should cut 2,000,000 federal jobs. The majority of these "feds" are lazy-assed, over-paid incompetents. Take a stroll through the U.S. DOT some day through a sea of fraud, waste and abuse. That's just one example. Washington, D.C. is loaded with these lazy do nothing fucks.

State workers are also an issue! Go to any state department and you will see 3-4 different divisions all with the same duties doing the same thing and many times requiring all the division OKs for a project to move forward!
 
And then what happens when all these laid off workers flood the unemployment market? What economic impact will it have on the country and the towns and cities that have large concentrations of government employees? Other people's businesses wil suffer for one thing because these people won't be spending in their communities. They will be drawing unemployment further burdening the taxpayers.

How Public Sector Layoffs 750,000 Killed Private Sector Jobs
As a recent study by the Economic Policy Institute showed, these job cuts ripple through the economy, also harming private sector job creation. In fact, EPI estimates that public sector job cuts have likely cost the private sector 750,000 jobs:

The economic “multiplier” of state and local spending (not including transfer payments) is large – around 1.24. This means that for every dollar cut in salary and supplies of public-sector workers, another $0.24 is lost in purchasing power throughout the rest of the economy. Teachers and firefighters stop going to restaurants and buying cars if they’re laid off, which reduces demand for waitstaff and autoworkers and so on. Add these two influences together (supplier jobs and jobs supported by this multiplier impact) and roughly 0.67 private sector jobs are lost for every public sector job cut. This means that the public sector being down 1.1 million jobs has likely cost the private sector 751,000 jobs.

So the solution is to hire more gov't workers we can't afford? Brilliant.
Only in the mind of the Left are people a liability.
 

Then why are you folks criticizing the UE rate?

Most of the UE during the Obama Presidency is coming from the Public sector. You should be pleased.

I dont see many commercials showing suffering laid of federal government workers. You got a source to back up that claim?

None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obama’s Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News

Since Obama took office, 636,000 state and local jobs have been cut. In 2011 alone, 113,000 jobs were cut in local schools, 68,000 jobs were cut in local government administration, and 78,000 jobs were cut in state government administration, according to a Commerce Department report.

You should be cheering this..no?
 
Then why are you folks criticizing the UE rate?

Most of the UE during the Obama Presidency is coming from the Public sector. You should be pleased.

I dont see many commercials showing suffering laid of federal government workers. You got a source to back up that claim?

None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obama’s Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News

Since Obama took office, 636,000 state and local jobs have been cut. In 2011 alone, 113,000 jobs were cut in local schools, 68,000 jobs were cut in local government administration, and 78,000 jobs were cut in state government administration, according to a Commerce Department report.

You should be cheering this..no?

State and local jobs have nothing to do with the federal government.
 
The Governor pledges to cut 10% of Federal Government Jobs. From his website:

Reduce The Federal Workforce By 10 Percent Via Attrition — Savings: $4 Billion. Despite widespread layoffs in the private sector, President Obama has continued to grow the federal payrolls. The federal workforce can be reduced by 10 percent through a “1-for-2” system of attrition, thereby reducing the number of federal employees while allowing the introduction of new talent into the federal service.

Free Republic's website place the figure at 2.8 million employees. So 10 percent will be 280,000 employees getting a pink slip with Romney being elected. Bain's business model inflicted on the US is a bad proposition.

The savings is $4B or something close to what, less than .5% of the federal debt?

So??

If the DEMAND is there, there would be private companies to take over whatever the service or product is... if not, it was incredibly unnecessary to begin with.. and cutting those jobs and associated services was long overdue

Yeah, the levees that saved New Orleans this time around would have not been built because it wasn't a money making proposition for Coke or Pepsi to build them. Or that highway between Shreveport and Lafayette that would take people away from the Hurricane--where was Microsoft or Apple when that needed to be built?
 
And then what happens when all these laid off workers flood the unemployment market? What economic impact will it have on the country and the towns and cities that have large concentrations of government employees? Other people's businesses wil suffer for one thing because these people won't be spending in their communities. They will be drawing unemployment further burdening the taxpayers.

How Public Sector Layoffs 750,000 Killed Private Sector Jobs
As a recent study by the Economic Policy Institute showed, these job cuts ripple through the economy, also harming private sector job creation. In fact, EPI estimates that public sector job cuts have likely cost the private sector 750,000 jobs:

So the solution is to hire more gov't workers we can't afford? Brilliant.
Only in the mind of the Left are people a liability.

And yet..somehow..we can afford to attack, conquer, destroy and completely rebuild..Iraq.

That's while shipping some 9 billion a year to Israel to pay for her defense, and billions to Egypt, Jordan, and various other Middle Eastern countries to keep them happy.

And that's while maintaining some 700 or so foreign military bases.

And that's while maintaining 11 carrier fleets patrolling foreign waters.

And that's while paying..who knows..on all sorts of top secret weapon systems.

That stuff..well by gosh darn it..we can afford!
 
I dont see many commercials showing suffering laid of federal government workers. You got a source to back up that claim?

None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obama’s Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News

Since Obama took office, 636,000 state and local jobs have been cut. In 2011 alone, 113,000 jobs were cut in local schools, 68,000 jobs were cut in local government administration, and 78,000 jobs were cut in state government administration, according to a Commerce Department report.

You should be cheering this..no?

State and local jobs have nothing to do with the federal government.

Sure they do.

Washington sends back money to states to employ state workers.

Man..
 

State and local jobs have nothing to do with the federal government.

Sure they do.

Washington sends back money to states to employ state workers.

Man..

So federal aid to states is earmarked for hiring hacks now?
 
The Governor pledges to cut 10% of Federal Government Jobs. From his website:



Free Republic's website place the figure at 2.8 million employees. So 10 percent will be 280,000 employees getting a pink slip with Romney being elected. Bain's business model inflicted on the US is a bad proposition.

The savings is $4B or something close to what, less than .5% of the federal debt?

So??

If the DEMAND is there, there would be private companies to take over whatever the service or product is... if not, it was incredibly unnecessary to begin with.. and cutting those jobs and associated services was long overdue

Yeah, the levees that saved New Orleans this time around would have not been built because it wasn't a money making proposition for Coke or Pepsi to build them. Or that highway between Shreveport and Lafayette that would take people away from the Hurricane--where was Microsoft or Apple when that needed to be built?

Where was the state and local government who are actually charged to do those things, where the FED is not??

Again.. you CONTINUALLY confuse levels of government and what is actually in the constitution
 
And then what happens when all these laid off workers flood the unemployment market? What economic impact will it have on the country and the towns and cities that have large concentrations of government employees? Other people's businesses wil suffer for one thing because these people won't be spending in their communities. They will be drawing unemployment further burdening the taxpayers.

How Public Sector Layoffs 750,000 Killed Private Sector Jobs
As a recent study by the Economic Policy Institute showed, these job cuts ripple through the economy, also harming private sector job creation. In fact, EPI estimates that public sector job cuts have likely cost the private sector 750,000 jobs:

So the solution is to hire more gov't workers we can't afford? Brilliant.

Nowhere did I or anyone else say the solution is to hire more government workers.
 
Then why are you folks criticizing the UE rate?

Most of the UE during the Obama Presidency is coming from the Public sector. You should be pleased.

I dont see many commercials showing suffering laid of federal government workers. You got a source to back up that claim?

None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obama’s Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News

Since Obama took office, 636,000 state and local jobs have been cut. In 2011 alone, 113,000 jobs were cut in local schools, 68,000 jobs were cut in local government administration, and 78,000 jobs were cut in state government administration, according to a Commerce Department report.

You should be cheering this..no?

If the jobs are redundant, then yes. Why keep jobs we no longer need? How much you want to bet most of the jobs lost are due to demographic and population changes, where the number of workers exceeds the number required for the current population?

You also didnt answer the part of my question to where federal jobs have been lost.
 
I'll give my worthy response
BUT FIRST : An important message for murkins !
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Dxt7xWDKc&feature=related]OOPS Cameron Diaz - YouTube[/ame]
 
I dont see many commercials showing suffering laid of federal government workers. You got a source to back up that claim?

None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obama’s Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News

Since Obama took office, 636,000 state and local jobs have been cut. In 2011 alone, 113,000 jobs were cut in local schools, 68,000 jobs were cut in local government administration, and 78,000 jobs were cut in state government administration, according to a Commerce Department report.

You should be cheering this..no?

If the jobs are redundant, then yes. Why keep jobs we no longer need? How much you want to bet most of the jobs lost are due to demographic and population changes, where the number of workers exceeds the number required for the current population?

You also didnt answer the part of my question to where federal jobs have been lost.

I posted public sector jobs.

In any case..you don't have a problem with it.

So..there is no argument here. You applaud this.
 
Via ATTRITION........

Don't know what that means, little girl?

Here, let me help you.

The gradual reduction of a workforce by employees' leaving and not being replaced rather than by their being laid off.

No pink slips. No layoffs. No one added to the unemployment figure.

And only $4B? Sure, if the average wage is about $15K.
 

If the jobs are redundant, then yes. Why keep jobs we no longer need? How much you want to bet most of the jobs lost are due to demographic and population changes, where the number of workers exceeds the number required for the current population?

You also didnt answer the part of my question to where federal jobs have been lost.

I posted public sector jobs.

In any case..you don't have a problem with it.

So..there is no argument here. You applaud this.

I applaud anything that reduces the size scope and cost of government to appropriate levels. And by appropriate I mean the bare minimum needed to function.
 
The Governor pledges to cut 10% of Federal Government Jobs. From his website:

Reduce The Federal Workforce By 10 Percent Via Attrition — Savings: $4 Billion. Despite widespread layoffs in the private sector, President Obama has continued to grow the federal payrolls. The federal workforce can be reduced by 10 percent through a “1-for-2” system of attrition, thereby reducing the number of federal employees while allowing the introduction of new talent into the federal service.

Free Republic's website place the figure at 2.8 million employees. So 10 percent will be 280,000 employees getting a pink slip with Romney being elected. Bain's business model inflicted on the US is a bad proposition.

The savings is $4B or something close to what, less than .5% of the federal debt?

Good. It's a start, but he needs to trim a lot more fat than that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top