Romney to cut 280,000 Jobs. Just ask him.

[The Rabbi]

Those people will find jobs in a stablized business community. It's too few, but as an initial cut, a good start.

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

No..that's basically correct.

You folks think cutting taxes on people with more money then they can hope to spend in several life times, while the method of generating revenue they employ costs the government more then they put into the kitty is "stimulative".

It is not.

And that's been proven over and over.

When these folks get their tax cuts..they wind up hoarding it.

See? Proof the Left doesn't understand economics.

 

[The Rabbi]

And yet, ironically, it's Republicans who are complaining the loudest that the sequester cuts coming up in January are going to result in big layoffs in the defense industry.

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

 

[Katzndogz]

Those people will find jobs in a stablized business community. It's too few, but as an initial cut, a good start.

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

 

[Sallow]

And yet, ironically, it's Republicans who are complaining the loudest that the sequester cuts coming up in January are going to result in big layoffs in the defense industry.

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

Except it doesn't.

In fact..it does the opposite.

The right doesn't have the capacity to understand how or why..

They only continue on this unconstitutional spending spree on arming ourselves to the teeth.

 

[NYcarbineer]

And yet, ironically, it's Republicans who are complaining the loudest that the sequester cuts coming up in January are going to result in big layoffs in the defense industry.

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

Who pays for a defense contract?

 

[Sallow]

Those people will find jobs in a stablized business community. It's too few, but as an initial cut, a good start.

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

The wealthy..who make use of a disproportional amount of government infrastructure..were charged a nominal rate back in the days of Eisenhower..for their proserity.

Now?

They pay laughably low rates for a system that makes them the wealthiest people in the world.

Want proof?

The largest number of extremely wealthy people reside in the United States.

It's basic math.

 

[The Rabbi]

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

The wealthy..who make use of a disproportional amount of government infrastructure..were charged a nominal rate back in the days of Eisenhower..for their proserity.

Now?

They pay laughably low rates for a system that makes them the wealthiest people in the world.

Want proof?

The largest number of extremely wealthy people reside in the United States.

It's basic math.

Taxing someone for being successful. Only on the Left.
You refuse to defend your wrong-headed view of economics. Tell us how hiring gov't workers is good for the economy.

 

[Sallow]

And yet, ironically, it's Republicans who are complaining the loudest that the sequester cuts coming up in January are going to result in big layoffs in the defense industry.

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

Who pays for a defense contract?

This is the same person who thinks a job digging ditches isn't stimulative.

But defense spending is..

The money all comes from the same fucking pool.

 

[RDD_1210]

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

Who pays for a defense contract?

This is the same person who thinks a job digging ditches isn't stimulative.

But defense spending is..

The money all comes from the same fucking pool.

He's the same person who thinks Black people can't be good political leaders. So yeah, to say he is not all there is pretty spot on.

 

[The Rabbi]

Who pays for a defense contract?

This is the same person who thinks a job digging ditches isn't stimulative.

But defense spending is..

The money all comes from the same fucking pool.

He's the same person who thinks Black people can't be good political leaders. So yeah, to say he is not all there is pretty spot on.

I didnt know you thought black people can't be good leaders. You must be a fucking brain-dead racist piece of shit.

 

[Katzndogz]

It's amazing to see the number of people who look at Greece, Spain or Italy and see a viable economic model.

Now if you think that the largest number of extremely wealthy people live in the United States, that understanding is the result of ignorance or clinging to a belief on principle when the facts stand against you.

Countries with the wealthiest individuals:


1. Luxembourg
2. Qatar
3. Norway
4. Kuwait
5. United Arab Emirates
6. Singapore
7. United States
8. Ireland
9. Equatorial Guinea
10. Switzerland

No WONDER Eduardo Saverin moved to Singapore.

 

[The Rabbi]

Proof?
I dont think the issue is layoffs, which will come in private industry btw, not gov't. The issue is that it weakens the US significantly.

Who pays for a defense contract?

This is the same person who thinks a job digging ditches isn't stimulative.

But defense spending is..

The money all comes from the same fucking pool.

Do you think gov't hiring people to dig ditches is stimulative?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Those people will find jobs in a stablized business community. It's too few, but as an initial cut, a good start.

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

The economy has lost 600,000 public sector jobs since Obama became president. You should be happy.

 

[Katzndogz]

Those were jobs supported by local municipalities that lost those jobs when those cities could no longer afford to pay those salaries. Federal jobs have grown, the federal bureaucracy has grown with every new department and expansion of the TSA.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Those people will find jobs in a stablized business community. It's too few, but as an initial cut, a good start.

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

Romney/Ryan's latest promises:

1. Will not cut defense spending, in fact, will increase it.

2. Will not touch Medicare

3. Will not touch Social Security

4. Will cut taxes.

Where does the money come from to pay for that budget buster??????

 

[JWBooth]

Says the former government employee.

Still on the teat.

Is he? Seems awfully hypocritical then. Not surprising though.

Retired military

 

[The Rabbi]

The left doesn't get it. TO them a job is a job. So if gov't hires people to dig ditches, that lowers unemployment. And it provides a multiplier because they spend the money they "earn". This is the "logic" behind Nancy Pelosi sayng food stamps were a stimulus, and other ignorant stupid statements of the sort.

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

Romney/Ryan's latest promises:

1. Will not cut defense spending, in fact, will increase it.

2. Will not touch Medicare

3. Will not touch Social Security

4. Will cut taxes.

Where does the money come from to pay for that budget buster??????

Increased tax revenue from a revived private sector. You know that tax receipts are down because of the recession--oops, recovery, right?
Why cant you grapple with the basic issue here? Why do you always deflect in every post?

 

[Sallow]

The left does not understand that the money has to come from someplace. They think they can tax the wealthy into providing prosperity for a population that exists solely to be supported by the wealthy. This is exactly what happened to Greece. The left can't see that, it's something they can't comprehend. They are like children thinking that mom and dad should be required to give them everything they want.

The wealthy..who make use of a disproportional amount of government infrastructure..were charged a nominal rate back in the days of Eisenhower..for their proserity.

Now?

They pay laughably low rates for a system that makes them the wealthiest people in the world.

Want proof?

The largest number of extremely wealthy people reside in the United States.

It's basic math.

Taxing someone for being successful. Only on the Left.
You refuse to defend your wrong-headed view of economics. Tell us how hiring gov't workers is good for the economy.

Personally..I'd rather see a fee for use.

Can you imagine what the justice system alone would rake in on a company like Coca-Cola? Or Mattel?

 

[Warrior102]

Says the former government employee.

Men and women who serve do not consider themselves "Government" employees.

We serve to serve our country. Haven't served under Carter and Clinton, we sure as shit didn't work for those assholes. They loathed us, and the feeling was mutual.

Had you had the nuts to enlist, you'd know all this, asswipe.

 

[DiamondDave]

The Governor pledges to cut 10% of Federal Government Jobs. From his website:

Reduce The Federal Workforce By 10 Percent Via Attrition — Savings: $4 Billion. Despite widespread layoffs in the private sector, President Obama has continued to grow the federal payrolls. The federal workforce can be reduced by 10 percent through a “1-for-2” system of attrition, thereby reducing the number of federal employees while allowing the introduction of new talent into the federal service.

Free Republic's website place the figure at 2.8 million employees. So 10 percent will be 280,000 employees getting a pink slip with Romney being elected. Bain's business model inflicted on the US is a bad proposition.

The savings is $4B or something close to what, less than .5% of the federal debt?

So??

If the DEMAND is there, there would be private companies to take over whatever the service or product is... if not, it was incredibly unnecessary to begin with.. and cutting those jobs and associated services was long overdue