Roger Stone Juror Could Serve Jail Time if It's Determined She Lied About Bias, Napolitano Says

[Lysistrata]

Ms. Hart only came forward and revealed herself as the jury forewoman after the prosecutors in the case that she had heard and voted upon were being undermined for political reasons. All of her fellow jurors also voted to convict stone.

You people who are complaining about stone's conviction are complaining about the judge and the jurors, without any evidence of bad conduct. Actually, if a biased juror was selected to sit on the panel hearing the case, it was stone's lawyers who screwed up during the jury-selection process. Look up "voir dire," "peremptory challenges," and "challenges for cause."

It is up to the lawyers handling his motion for a new trial to comb the trial transcript and point out, citing the transcript, exactly where the judge or stone's lawyers messed up.

If this is not done, attacks on the judge, jurors, and/or prosecutors consist of nothing but horseshit piled higher and deeper.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

It's not up to me. If it were, the Tar would be boiling and the feathers would be thick. And the Rail would be honed to a sharp edge. Ah, the good old days.

Lol you wouldn’t be around

You wouldnt' be either. Be careful on how you treat the one you usurp, it may come back to haunt you like it is right now.

I would be a son of liberty .. you want stone in jail for nothing

Some of the worst Despots in history said the same thing.

You are the same a communist Stalin no difference,, I am your worse enemy

In your mind. You are a putz. What's worse, you are a Party of the Rump Putz.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting

Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.

You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him

He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.

The judge was extremely bias. Took away his free speech even after his verdict.. again why don’t you believe in a fair trial ?

I do. The question here is why you think he deserves to be let off lightly in spite of being convicted? We all know the rich get way better treatment in a court of law than the masses. That's a fact. You seem to think it is proper for a guy like Stone to treat the whole process like a joke, defy court orders, and then walk away scot-free from a lawful conviction.

It was not lawful if the Jury was not as unbiased as possible, with foreperson being a Trump hater she was in the perfect position to sway the whole Jury.

 

[Lysistrata]

Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.

You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him

He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.

The judge was extremely bias. Took away his free speech even after his verdict.. again why don’t you believe in a fair trial ?

I do. The question here is why you think he deserves to be let off lightly in spite of being convicted? We all know the rich get way better treatment in a court of law than the masses. That's a fact. You seem to think it is proper for a guy like Stone to treat the whole process like a joke, defy court orders, and then walk away scot-free from a lawful conviction.

It was not lawful if the Jury was not as unbiased as possible, with foreperson being a Trump hater she was in the perfect position to sway the whole Jury.

There is no evidence that Ms. Hart swayed the whole jury. No other juror has spoken up, much less made this claim. You are implying that no juror who liked trump would have voted to convict stone, which would mean that a trump-supporting juror would have been biased from the beginning.

Your assertion that this was a political show trial has no foundation and is backed by no citation to the record. Stone was indicted by a grand jury, and then convicted by another jury.

Anyway, where would anyone find 12 people to sit on a jury who did not have an opinion about trump one way or the other?

 

[Jitss617]

You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him

He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.

The judge was extremely bias. Took away his free speech even after his verdict.. again why don’t you believe in a fair trial ?

I do. The question here is why you think he deserves to be let off lightly in spite of being convicted? We all know the rich get way better treatment in a court of law than the masses. That's a fact. You seem to think it is proper for a guy like Stone to treat the whole process like a joke, defy court orders, and then walk away scot-free from a lawful conviction.

It was not lawful if the Jury was not as unbiased as possible, with foreperson being a Trump hater she was in the perfect position to sway the whole Jury.

There is no evidence that Ms. Hart swayed the whole jury. No other juror has spoken up, much less made this claim. You are implying that no juror who liked trump would have voted to convict stone, which would mean that a trump-supporting juror would have been biased from the beginning.

Your assertion that this was a political show trial has no foundation and is backed by no citation to the record. Stone was indicted by a grand jury, and then convicted by another jury.

Anyway, where would anyone find 12 people to sit on a jury who did not have an opinion about trump one way or the other?

Lol she was the FORMAN! Of course she swayed the jury

 

[anynameyouwish]

Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.

You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat

"You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat"


a FAIR TRIAL would include ALL the facts and ALL of the witnesses. Apparently republicans, conservatives and YOU do NOT believe in a fair trial.

typical ignorant lying fascist republican

 

[The Original Tree]

Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.

McCabe, Comey, Strozk, Page, Ohr, Baker, Clapper, Brennan, Clinton, Vindman, Eric Ciaramella, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice are all White Collar Criminals. But you only care about process crimes and railroading people during a Fake Investigation based on Fraud.

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.

You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat

"You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat"


a FAIR TRIAL would include ALL the facts and ALL of the witnesses. Apparently republicans, conservatives and YOU do NOT believe in a fair trial.

typical ignorant lying fascist republican

Who didn’t have witnesses?

 

[Snouter]

Africa shows how leaving government to Blacks results.

 

[The Original Tree]

You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat

He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.

By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf

Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.

So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting

Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.

Dude Shut Up. You look like an Idiot again. Every time you morons get caught trying to rig an election, an investigation, or a trial, you just make it worse trying to explain yourself out of it.

How about just say, That Was Wrong, and that You Were Embarrassed by what they did?

People would start respecting your difference of opinion instead of thinking you are a loon.

 

[Nostra]

Andrew Napolitano, who is hardly a cheerleader for Team Trump, told Tucker Carlson Thursday evening that Tomeka Hart, the woman who served as foreperson on the jury during Roger Stone's trial, could face jail time if it's determined she lied about her bias when she was selected to serve on the jury....

....Tomeka Hart's Twitter page, which hasn't been active since November 2019, is full of anti-Trump tweets and links. It's obvious this woman was a hardcore partisan who was set on convicting Stone and lied in order to get on the jury to ensure that happened.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------

I don’t think the juror had to lie. The judge was making sure the jury was full of Trump haters so she may have been perfectly aware of this juror’s background....Impeaching HER might well be in the cards!

Ruh-Roh..............Nap will be on the Dimwinger's shit list again.