Roger Stone Juror Could Serve Jail Time if It's Determined She Lied About Bias, Napolitano Says

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,854
400
Andrew Napolitano, who is hardly a cheerleader for Team Trump, told Tucker Carlson Thursday evening that Tomeka Hart, the woman who served as foreperson on the jury during Roger Stone's trial, could face jail time if it's determined she lied about her bias when she was selected to serve on the jury....

....Tomeka Hart's Twitter page, which hasn't been active since November 2019, is full of anti-Trump tweets and links. It's obvious this woman was a hardcore partisan who was set on convicting Stone and lied in order to get on the jury to ensure that happened.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------

I don’t think the juror had to lie. The judge was making sure the jury was full of Trump haters so she may have been perfectly aware of this juror’s background....Impeaching HER might well be in the cards!
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
 
The ghoulish, amoral, beast is that monster that fucked with our justice system. What the f@ck name is Tomeka? A tranny? Needs more bright red lipstick...

Tomeka-Hart-2.jpeg


Roger Stone should be entitled to prosecute this disgusting, banana republic, Obama loving POS.
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
 
The ghoulish, amoral, beast is that monster that fucked with our justice system. What the f@ck name is Tomeka? A tranny? Needs more bright red lipstick...

Tomeka-Hart-2.jpeg


Roger Stone should be entitled to prosecute this disgusting, banana republic, Obama loving POS.
Angry black man lol
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.
 
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.
You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf

And let's leave him enough to buy a bunch of pencils so he can stand on a street corner and actually EARN an honest living AFTER his prison sentence.
 
Why do you give two shits about that ghoulish amoral asshole? If we can no longer convict white-collar criminals in this country we are no better than any failed state where laws are for the poor and unconnected.
You don’t believe all Americans deserve a fair trial? Typical democrat
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf

And let's leave him enough to buy a bunch of pencils so he can stand on a street corner and actually EARN an honest living AFTER his prison sentence.
He didn’t earn a honest living? Huh
 
He had as fair a trial as any rich connected American can get. That is to say way more fair than any of us could get considering his antics and he still got convicted.
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.
You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him
He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.
 
By a bias juror you think thats fair? How is he rich? He lost his house, no insurance, wire is deaf
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.
You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him
He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.
The judge was extremely bias. Took away his free speech even after his verdict.. again why don’t you believe in a fair trial ?
 
Andrew Napolitano, who is hardly a cheerleader for Team Trump, told Tucker Carlson Thursday evening that Tomeka Hart, the woman who served as foreperson on the jury during Roger Stone's trial, could face jail time if it's determined she lied about her bias when she was selected to serve on the jury....

....Tomeka Hart's Twitter page, which hasn't been active since November 2019, is full of anti-Trump tweets and links. It's obvious this woman was a hardcore partisan who was set on convicting Stone and lied in order to get on the jury to ensure that happened.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------

I don’t think the juror had to lie. The judge was making sure the jury was full of Trump haters so she may have been perfectly aware of this juror’s background....Impeaching HER might well be in the cards!

Absolutely send her packing. Completely unacceptable, usual democrat trying to be above due process.
 
She ain't gonna serve no time.

For two reasons, no one will dare touch her.

In fact, she will probably be elected to public office this time.
 
Jailhouse is full of people who got a raw deal. He can somehow afford excellent lawyers and has powerful friends working diligently to make sure he gets off scot-free. Clearly he enjoys advantages the rest of could only dream of if we were on trial for federal crimes.
So you don’t believe in fair trials for everybody.. interesting
Looks like reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Having good lawyers and powerful friends is such an advantage in a court of law that on the rare occasions the rich actually get jail time for anything it makes the news for days. This is a golden age of white-collar crime to rival the heyday of the robber barons.
You just said he does not deserve a fair trial that’s kind of creepy.. all because you disagree with him
He got a an extra-fair trial with an unbelievably lenient judge and still got convicted. If there is any kind of miscarriage of justice here it's the same old story of a rich man getting a slap on the wrist in a system that would put us away for decades for far less.
The judge was extremely bias. Took away his free speech even after his verdict.. again why don’t you believe in a fair trial ?
I do. The question here is why you think he deserves to be let off lightly in spite of being convicted? We all know the rich get way better treatment in a court of law than the masses. That's a fact. You seem to think it is proper for a guy like Stone to treat the whole process like a joke, defy court orders, and then walk away scot-free from a lawful conviction.
 

Forum List

Back
Top