Right Wing Posters! What are your REAL expectations for Nov 2nd?

[The Rabbi]

Bumping up so more Right wingers can give us specifics on what they expect will happen on Nov 2nd.

Obama, Pelosi and Reid will form a suicide pact.

Ok, there you go.

Biden will be so shocked he'll have a heart attack and die. John Boehner will be the next president. Peace and prosperity will prevail.
If any of the happens next week I'm buying a lottery ticket.

 

[edthecynic]

Obama, Pelosi and Reid will form a suicide pact.

Ok, there you go.

Biden will be so shocked he'll have a heart attack and die. John Boehner will be the next president. Peace and prosperity will prevail.
If any of the happens next week I'm buying a lottery ticket.

Boner chokes to death from smoking too many "safe" cigarettes. Mitch McConnell is mistaken for a turtle and made into soup. Hillary Clinton becomes the next president. Liberty, individualism and budget surpluses will prevail.

Libertarian Party spoof on Boner and GOP Pledge to Destroy America
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqT1pcisPRA&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

[Kat]

I've heard words like "drubbing", "bloodbath", "wiped out", "destroyed", "decimated", "crying in their defeat" and so on when referring to what will happen to the Democrats after the November 2nd election....but I am seeing little or no specifics? Generalizations are cheap....but I'd like some Righties (especially those like LibocalypseNow, Willow Tree, The T, bigrebnc1775, The Rabbi, Lonestar_Logic, and USArmyRetired) to clarify what they consider a win for their side. What constitutes a drubbing? What constitutes a bloodbath? and so on and so forth....

Maybe even step up and state who's gonna win what specific races.....

I have none. I hate all politicians now.

 

[Mad Scientist]

I've heard words like "drubbing", "bloodbath", "wiped out", "destroyed", "decimated", "crying in their defeat" and so on when referring to what will happen to the Democrats after the November 2nd election....but I am seeing little or no specifics? Generalizations are cheap....but I'd like some Righties (especially those like LibocalypseNow, Willow Tree, The T, bigrebnc1775, The Rabbi, Lonestar_Logic, and USArmyRetired) to clarify what they consider a win for their side. What constitutes a drubbing? What constitutes a bloodbath? and so on and so forth....

Maybe even step up and state who's gonna win what specific races.....

Republicans gain 50+ seats in the House and 5-8 Seats in the Senate.

 

[Jeremy]

Fuck winger!!!!! Mr. Mister is soooo much better!!!!!!

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

I've heard words like "drubbing", "bloodbath", "wiped out", "destroyed", "decimated", "crying in their defeat" and so on when referring to what will happen to the Democrats after the November 2nd election....but I am seeing little or no specifics? Generalizations are cheap....but I'd like some Righties (especially those like LibocalypseNow, Willow Tree, The T, bigrebnc1775, The Rabbi, Lonestar_Logic, and USArmyRetired) to clarify what they consider a win for their side. What constitutes a drubbing? What constitutes a bloodbath? and so on and so forth....

Maybe even step up and state who's gonna win what specific races.....

I have no idea what is going to happen in this election.

In order for the descriptors you use to be valid I would have to say that the democrats would have to lose the majority in both the house and senate on a federal level and if liberal states such as massachussetts elect republican governors.

if those 3 things happen then it will be a decimation of the past 4 years of democrat legislative branch dominance. The governors would be a decimation of their executive dominance in government.

 

[Liability]

You first, Hateist.

The lie highlighted in RED was asserted without proof so therefore it can be dismissed without proof.

"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."
— Christopher Hitchens

Hateist is still not a word, idiot.

And I didn't MAKE the assertion. You highlighted it and labeled it a "lie."

For it to be a "lie" which IS YOUR claim, stupid, you'd have to show that the statement itself is factually erroneous (which you haven't done and you can't do) AND you'd have to show that the author of that statement KNEW it was untrue when he made that original statement. But, you cannot establish that, either, obviously.

Sorry, anus-face, but as always, you lose.

Oh, since you are a loser, anus-face, I'll give you a small assist:

After you stop soiling your panties, try to man up long enough to say something coherent, eh?

How stupid do you have to be to support a lie with a chart that is a lie????
Just because you pretend not to know you are posting a lie does not mean you are not a liar. It means you are a STUPID lying gossip rather than a PREMEDITATED liar, either way you are a liar.

Your dishonest chart does not include Bush's "OFF BUDGET" DEFICIT SPENDING. The deficit rises with "OFF BUDGET" DEFICIT SPENDING as well as with the on budget deficit spending in your dishonest chart, and your lie did say "raised the deficit." Below is the debt to the penny calculator, with it you can calculate the true deficit spending for any period of time. Plug in the the 8 years of Bush spending and subtract the starting amount from the ending amount. Then plug in Obama's 2 years and do the same. Bush's total deficit will be much higher than Obama's whether you use calendar years, which you would need to claim 2 years for Obama, or fiscal years as shown in your dishonest chart.

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

The Chart from The Heritage Foundation came originally from The Washington Post.

As you knew already, you liar, the "chart" simply is NOT a lie.

When you, being a completely dishonest pussy, do not like a given fact, you dishonestly and fully deny it.

This is one of the many reasons an asshole like you has no actual credibility edthesickdick.

There are, by the way, many ways to manipulate an argument about "the" budget. Figures lie and liars figure. You constitute proof enough of that. But when real numbers are used and justified by credible sources, a meaningful discussion can take place. This offends you, however, since it contradicts your basic philosophy: lie your worthless ass off.

You truly suck at this.

 

[edthecynic]

Hateist is still not a word, idiot.

And I didn't MAKE the assertion. You highlighted it and labeled it a "lie."

For it to be a "lie" which IS YOUR claim, stupid, you'd have to show that the statement itself is factually erroneous (which you haven't done and you can't do) AND you'd have to show that the author of that statement KNEW it was untrue when he made that original statement. But, you cannot establish that, either, obviously.

Sorry, anus-face, but as always, you lose.

Oh, since you are a loser, anus-face, I'll give you a small assist:

After you stop soiling your panties, try to man up long enough to say something coherent, eh?

How stupid do you have to be to support a lie with a chart that is a lie????
Just because you pretend not to know you are posting a lie does not mean you are not a liar. It means you are a STUPID lying gossip rather than a PREMEDITATED liar, either way you are a liar.

Your dishonest chart does not include Bush's "OFF BUDGET" DEFICIT SPENDING. The deficit rises with "OFF BUDGET" DEFICIT SPENDING as well as with the on budget deficit spending in your dishonest chart, and your lie did say "raised the deficit." Below is the debt to the penny calculator, with it you can calculate the true deficit spending for any period of time. Plug in the the 8 years of Bush spending and subtract the starting amount from the ending amount. Then plug in Obama's 2 years and do the same. Bush's total deficit will be much higher than Obama's whether you use calendar years, which you would need to claim 2 years for Obama, or fiscal years as shown in your dishonest chart.

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

The Chart from The Heritage Foundation came originally from The Washington Post.

As you knew already, you liar, the "chart" simply is NOT a lie.

When you, being a completely dishonest pussy, do not like a given fact, you dishonestly and fully deny it.

This is one of the many reasons an asshole like you has no actual credibility edthesickdick.

There are, by the way, many ways to manipulate an argument about "the" budget. Figures lie and liars figure. You constitute proof enough of that. But when real numbers are used and justified by credible sources, a meaningful discussion can take place. This offends you, however, since it contradicts your basic philosophy: lie your worthless ass off.

You truly suck at this.

First of all, if the chart was honest the right wing extremest Heritage Foundation would not use it.
The fact remains that your dishonest chart does not include Bush's "OFF BUDGET" DEFICIT SPENDING as the debt calculator proves, and you well know.

Your dishonest chart shows only a $2.5 Trillion total deficit for Bush's 8 budgets. But somehow the National debt rose $6 Trillion from $5,806,151,389,190.21 to $11,909,829,003,511.75 during that exact same 8 budget time period. That means Bush dishonestly kept $3.5 Trillion in deficit spending "off budget."

Please explain how the national debt could rise $6 trillion for Bush's 8 budgets if his total deficit spending shown on your dishonest chart was only $2.5 trillion for his 8 budgets?????

 

[bodecea]

Just a few more days left to give out your awesome Republican predictions. How badly will Democrats take it in the shorts, folks?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

On the morning of Nov 3, the few remaining Dems will gather in Congress, try to figure out how they lost to O'Donnell, Joe Miller et al.

Pelosi will play Wagner's Gotterdammerung, Reid will be watching PBS, they'll all swear to a Suicide Pact, but then break it as quickly as they promised to be fiscally responsible.

Biden will waltz in and blame it all on "those idiots in the White House!"

 

[bodecea]

On the morning of Nov 3, the few remaining Dems will gather in Congress, try to figure out how they lost to O'Donnell, Joe Miller et al.

Pelosi will play Wagner's Gotterdammerung, Reid will be watching PBS, they'll all swear to a Suicide Pact, but then break it as quickly as they promised to be fiscally responsible.

Biden will waltz in and blame it all on "those idiots in the White House!"

How few is "the few remaining Dems"?

 

[Cal]

My real expectations are for more balance of power in our two party state.

The last two years have been disastrous as a result of one party run amok.

Yeah, and having more Republicans is totally gonna fix everything, right? They wanna work with the Democrats this time, right?
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." - Mitch Mcconnell
Yeahh.. Not. They don't care about the huge issues pressing our nation. They care about seeing Obama fail. I've been saying this all along. Obama could do every single thing they've campaigned on this season and they'd find a way to label it "socialism", "communism", "facism", or some other "ism". Their goal is an Obama failure.

 

[Zander]

My real expectations are for more balance of power in our two party state.

The last two years have been disastrous as a result of one party run amok.

Yeah, and having more Republicans is totally gonna fix everything, right? They wanna work with the Democrats this time, right?
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." - Mitch Mcconnell
Yeahh.. Not. They don't care about the huge issues pressing our nation. They care about seeing Obama fail. I've been saying this all along. Obama could do every single thing they've campaigned on this season and they'd find a way to label it "socialism", "communism", "facism", or some other "ism". Their goal is an Obama failure.

Here's a Newsflash lefty - Conservatives don't need to "hope he he fails" - he already has. Now we have to clean up his mess.

 

[edthecynic]

My real expectations are for more balance of power in our two party state.

The last two years have been disastrous as a result of one party run amok.

Yeah, and having more Republicans is totally gonna fix everything, right? They wanna work with the Democrats this time, right?
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." - Mitch Mcconnell
Yeahh.. Not. They don't care about the huge issues pressing our nation. They care about seeing Obama fail. I've been saying this all along. Obama could do every single thing they've campaigned on this season and they'd find a way to label it "socialism", "communism", "facism", or some other "ism". Their goal is an Obama failure.

Here's a Newsflash lefty - Conservatives don't need to "hope he he fails" - he already has. Now we have to clean up his mess.

You can't even clean up the mess from the CON$ervative failure under Bush. But CON$ don't want to clean up anything, they want to finish their destruction of this great country that Bush left undone.

 

[Liability]

Yeah, and having more Republicans is totally gonna fix everything, right? They wanna work with the Democrats this time, right?
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." - Mitch Mcconnell
Yeahh.. Not. They don't care about the huge issues pressing our nation. They care about seeing Obama fail. I've been saying this all along. Obama could do every single thing they've campaigned on this season and they'd find a way to label it "socialism", "communism", "facism", or some other "ism". Their goal is an Obama failure.

Here's a Newsflash lefty - Conservatives don't need to "hope he he fails" - he already has. Now we have to clean up his mess.

. . . [neener neener!] . .Warning: No altering anothers post-Meister . .

[YOUR KIND ATTENTION PLEASE. Due to possible confusion, I must make this crystal clear to assist our liberal "friends." PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that edthesickdick is NOT the one who said "neeneer neener!" I deleted his gibberish from my quotation of his post and then inserted, in BRACKETS, my own editorial correction efforts.]

I offer the above helpful Douche-nozzle edthesickdick-to-English translator service in the interest of better communication.

No need to thank me.

Thank me very much.

 

[bodecea]

Here's a Newsflash lefty - Conservatives don't need to "hope he he fails" - he already has. Now we have to clean up his mess.

[neener neener!]

I offer the above helpful Douche-nozzle edthesickdick-to-English translator service in the interest of better communication.

No need to thank me.

Thank me very much.

I guess altering poster's posts without permission is back in style.No it's not

 

[Liability]

[neener neener!]

I offer the above helpful Douche-nozzle edthesickdick-to-English translator service in the interest of better communication.

No need to thank me.

Thank me very much.

I guess altering poster's posts without permission is back in style.

I guess you're stupid, since I never said it went out of style. But thanks for being topical.

The above sentence isn't entirely true. It's not a guess.

What's the matter boredtoseeya, you think you're the only one who gets her username tweaked?

EDIT: Note the additional NOTICE in the post to which boredtoseeya takes exception. Golly. I hope that clears things up for her!

 

[Samson]

What's the matter boredtoseeya, you think you're the only one who gets her username tweaked?

It's like some virtual act of S&M.




I'm sure she secretly likes it.

 

[The T]

50-55 seats in the House, 7-8 seats in the Senate.

It's going to be interesting watching Republicans support tax increases in 2-4 years.

It will be interesting to watch them cut the size, and budget, of government.

*This is their mandate* If they don't at least set the wheels in motion and show they're trying? They'll be out again. They're on thin ice as it is. (Make that probation with the people).

 

[The T]

I've heard words like "drubbing", "bloodbath", "wiped out", "destroyed", "decimated", "crying in their defeat" and so on when referring to what will happen to the Democrats after the November 2nd election....but I am seeing little or no specifics? Generalizations are cheap....but I'd like some Righties (especially those like LibocalypseNow, Willow Tree, The T, bigrebnc1775, The Rabbi, Lonestar_Logic, and USArmyRetired) to clarify what they consider a win for their side. What constitutes a drubbing? What constitutes a bloodbath? and so on and so forth....

Maybe even step up and state who's gonna win what specific races.....

I have none. I hate all politicians now.

Statesmen all the way baby!