- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,528
- 2,263
- 1,045
You're close, but need to work on your reading comprehension.... his point is, that you liberals see no sexual deviancy in homosexuality, thus you also see no sexual deviancy in pedophiles, demonstrated by the new hate crime law where it was disgusted to REMOVE pedophiles from the bill, but was NOT, by the LIBERALS in control. So one can reasonably assume that liberals no longer feel pedophiles are a sexual deviant, therefore warrant special protection under the law.
This FAIL moment brought to you by Pale Rider!
yea, dude.. it sure is the case that NO ONE is equating fags with pedos!
Sorry.... did you make a point?
As a matter of fact, yes. I've bolded cognitive failure time and again and made fun of your assumption that extending equality to gays "essentially" validates gay pedos (as if there are no hetero pedos). Further, I'm lampooning your take on the issue in relation to the EXACT same arguements against the PC-ness of the civil rights era. For real, dude. Eat more Carrots and Fish. You know.. brain food.