Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Read what I wrote......I said all but the most serious are settled out of court.
Frivolous claims are not settled with a years severance pay......ever
Frivolous cases are settled for greater amounts than that all the time. I know a woman who got half a million because one of her co-workers made a pass at her.
Sure she did
bripat as anecdotal witness?
So they can give her the Valerie Plame treatment.
So they can give her the Valerie Plame treatment.
They've been squawking for the identity of the women for the longest, claiming he should "face his accusers." They want to put the victims up on the stage and dehumanize, propagandize, tarnish and other wise victimize the victims all over again.
I just love to see RepubliCON$ shooting themselves in the foot.
That's the FIRST thing they squawked when the story first aired.Point? I didnt ask you for a point I asked you a question. Are you ok? Dizzy? Here it is again
Are you suggesting that Repubs havent been wanting her identity revealed?
"Where's his accusers?" "He should be able to face his accusers!"
Now they, as usual, are running from it.
Cains big problem is that the more he badmouths his acusors the more likely it becomes that they will come out and defend themselves
bripat as anecdotal witness?
I'm far more credible than the women accusing Cain.
That's the FIRST thing they squawked when the story first aired.
"Where's his accusers?" "He should be able to face his accusers!"
Now they, as usual, are running from it.
Cains big problem is that the more he badmouths his acusors the more likely it becomes that they will come out and defend themselves
The left literally pulls stories out of their rear ends. RW, please show the clip or quote of Cain badmouthing his accusers.
No, anonymous sources should be the only thing required to ruin the good name and reputation of a man--so long as they are a conservative.
The left's double standards are so transparent, and this attack is only going to ensure Cain's candidacy.
bripat as anecdotal witness?
I'm far more credible than the women accusing Cain.
How on earth would you know anything about the women?
Well FOR SURE. why should ANYONE want to FACE their accuser.
In liberal la la land, we are ALL JUST suppose to ACCEPT things by some Unnamed Accuser of something that HAPPEND 20 YEARS AGO BECAUSE Politico and the LAMESTREAM media TOLD US....
Cain knows who she is, YOU are not being accused of anything except being a 5 star dumbass.
Cain has faced her, Repubs just want her info so they can MAKE HER a public figure against her will. Then go through her records to smear someone who isnt a public figure.
Politics of personal destruction. Dont you just hate that?
I'm far more credible than the women accusing Cain.
How on earth would you know anything about the women?
We know that she took a large sum of money to be silent and now she wants to keep the money and blab.. soon as she sends back ALL the money with interest then she can blab..
Cains big problem is that the more he badmouths his acusors the more likely it becomes that they will come out and defend themselves
The left literally pulls stories out of their rear ends. RW, please show the clip or quote of Cain badmouthing his accusers.
No, anonymous sources should be the only thing required to ruin the good name and reputation of a man--so long as they are a conservative.
The left's double standards are so transparent, and this attack is only going to ensure Cain's candidacy.
Cains response is that their claim had no merit. He is claiming that they trumped up charges on him and that he was responsible for no wrongdoing
The more Cain lays blame on the woman......the more likely she is to come out and defend herself
The left literally pulls stories out of their rear ends. RW, please show the clip or quote of Cain badmouthing his accusers.
No, anonymous sources should be the only thing required to ruin the good name and reputation of a man--so long as they are a conservative.
The left's double standards are so transparent, and this attack is only going to ensure Cain's candidacy.
Cains response is that their claim had no merit. He is claiming that they trumped up charges on him and that he was responsible for no wrongdoing
The more Cain lays blame on the woman......the more likely she is to come out and defend herself
So when an actual woman came out with allegations of rape and Clinton went full blown--not claiming his innocence--but attacking the character of his accusers, well he was just being a man.
When Cain gets blind-sided by anonymous sources claiming sexual misconduct and he proclaims his innocence to you that is attacking his accusers. Do you actually believe the things you say, or are you that blinded by partisanship.
It is impossible to be intellectually consistent and honest when you are a liberal, and you are demonstrating that absurdity so well.
What's funny is the shrieking liberals can't get past their racist roots.
Black people are not allowed to have their own thoughts or veer from the leftist agenda...if they dare to do so, the lib machine screams "RAPE!" and calls for a lynching.
So they can give her the Valerie Plame treatment.
Well we know the vague, slippery, and unsubstantiated information that is being eked out by the alleged "victim". Or her attorney. Or the press. Or nameless dishonest Dem election professionals and politicians.
