Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And the tax exemption part is about what...just because?
You can't claim an exemption for a person who has established a legal residence outside your home.
Yes you can:
Senate Bill 667, known as "Equalize Voter Rights," would remove the tax exemption for dependents who register to vote at any address other than their parents' home.
See you cant REMOVE something that doesn't exist, so you are wrong sir
Oh.. it is HARD
Yeah... I mean they have to obey the law, but if it is that HARD, well, just ignore and and do what is easier!!!!!!!!
Hard to Obey what law? The one passed 30 years ago with the Supreme Court or the One made up that goes against that law?
You register to vote with your permanent legal address.. not your beach house.. not your hotel room... not the storage space you rent.. and not some other temporary address, even if it is a dorm or apartment... you want to register there, MAKE IT YOUR PERMANENT ADDRESS.. but guess what? You are then on your own and not someone's dependent.. it is not difficult to understand.. and it is not any more difficult to register or vote compared to anyone else...
They don't have to make it their permanent address. See, as proof that's why I keep pointing you toward Wiki while you keep pointing to your butthole
Senate bill seeks to curb college vote :: WRAL.com
Senate bill seeks to curb college vote
By Laura Leslie
Posted: April 3
Tags: Elections
Raleigh, N.C. — A bill filed in the state Senate Tuesday would carry a tax penalty for parents whose children register to vote at their college address.
Senate Bill 667, known as "Equalize Voter Rights," would remove the tax exemption for dependents who register to vote at any address other than their parents' home.
"If the voter is a dependent of the voter's parent or legal guardian, is 18 years of age or older and the voter has registered at an address other than that of the parent or legal guardian, the parent or legal guardian will not be allowed to claim the voter as a dependent for state income tax purposes," the bill says.
The measure would affect only state income tax, so it wouldn't have much effect on out-of-state students. But it could effectively cut student voting in counties like Watauga and Orange, where college voters have been a key part of the Democratic Party's dominance.
The bill would also require voters to have their vehicles registered at the same address as their voter registration. That also could cut down on college student registration, since many students maintain their vehicle registration in their home counties.
talk
Come on Cc you haven't answered this question so I'll ask again.
So now how about you explain how overloading a district with temporary students that have the ability to manipulate local elections is fair for the permanent residence and tax payers in that area?
Cc realizes that with the liberal education system, college kids are to stupid to vote on an absantee ballot, or cc wants them to vote twice.
Cc realizes that with the liberal education system, college kids are to stupid to vote on an absantee ballot, or cc wants them to vote twice.
Actually the reason for it as stated by the person who introduced the bill was to stop kids from voting liberal. But what he says doesn't matter I guess, words have no meaning.
Cc realizes that with the liberal education system, college kids are to stupid to vote on an absantee ballot, or cc wants them to vote twice.
Actually the reason for it as stated by the person who introduced the bill was to stop kids from voting liberal. But what he says doesn't matter I guess, words have no meaning.
No.. that is also false
That story was taken from a speech given at a political event.. and the quote also is only taken in part (look where the ACTUAL quotation begins and look at the fact that the entire speech is not referenced at all)
The basis was already explained to you.. it is indeed simple to understand... you just refuse to
Actually the reason for it as stated by the person who introduced the bill was to stop kids from voting liberal. But what he says doesn't matter I guess, words have no meaning.
No.. that is also false
That story was taken from a speech given at a political event.. and the quote also is only taken in part (look where the ACTUAL quotation begins and look at the fact that the entire speech is not referenced at all)
The basis was already explained to you.. it is indeed simple to understand... you just refuse to
Did he say it or not? Because saying it's false suggests he never said it, and he did
No.. that is also false
That story was taken from a speech given at a political event.. and the quote also is only taken in part (look where the ACTUAL quotation begins and look at the fact that the entire speech is not referenced at all)
The basis was already explained to you.. it is indeed simple to understand... you just refuse to
Did he say it or not? Because saying it's false suggests he never said it, and he did
You state it was said about the bill.. that is not determinable at all from the information given.. that would indeed require more context and a date of when it was given in comparison to the authoring/submission of the bill
So saying your explanation of REASON is FALSE is indeed valid
New Hampshire House Speaker William O’Brien, a Republican, told a tea party group that allowing people to register and vote on Election Day led to “the kids coming out of the schools and basically doing what I did when I was a kid, which is voting as a liberal. That’s what kids do — they don’t have life experience, and they just vote their feelings.”
Members of the College Republicans, however, seem to support the measures and are wary the laws will curb youth voting.
Read more: Students hit by voter ID restrictions - Emily Schultheis - POLITICO.com
College Republican National Committee spokeswoman Alyssa Farah told POLITICO in an email that the organization “has not taken a formal position” on the laws but doesn’t find them “overly burdensome.”
Read more: Students hit by voter ID restrictions - Emily Schultheis - POLITICO.com
With the 2012 primary season beginning in just over a month, student groups are scrambling to educate their campuses about new requirements in time for students to vote in the primaries.
“This is unprecedented,” said Rock the Vote President Heather Smith. “State by state across the country since the 2010 elections, really throughout the past year, we have seen an unprecedented number of attempts to restrict voting rights, in particular for young voters and minorities.”
Many college students don’t have a valid ID from the state where they’re attending school. In order to vote on or near campus, those students would need to apply for and get new state-issued IDs well in advance of primary day or Election Day.
“It’s the opposite of customer-friendly,” said Peter Levine, director of The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
Read more: Students hit by voter ID restrictions - Emily Schultheis - POLITICO.com
How on Earth is this preventing anyone from voting? How dumb is the op?
Geesh....
New Hampshire House Speaker William OBrien, a Republican, told a tea party group that allowing people to register and vote on Election Day led to the kids coming out of the schools and basically doing what I did when I was a kid, which is voting as a liberal. Thats what kids do they dont have life experience, and they just vote their feelings.
Read more: Students hit by voter ID restrictions - Emily Schultheis - POLITICO.com
Cant allow that huh?
Come on Cc you haven't answered this question so I'll ask again.
So now how about you explain how overloading a district with temporary students that have the ability to manipulate local elections is fair for the permanent residence and tax payers in that area?
Overloading? You mean attending college?
Come on Cc you haven't answered this question so I'll ask again.
So now how about you explain how overloading a district with temporary students that have the ability to manipulate local elections is fair for the permanent residence and tax payers in that area?
Overloading? You mean attending college?
No, overloading as in thousands of temporary people having no stake in the community having the ability to sway local elections. How would you like a butt load of students voting for a new tax levy that you object to and they will never have to pay. But hey someone at school told them to vote for it, won't cost them anything, so why not? Screw'em let them vote where at least someone in the family has an investment in the community.
