- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,080
- 145,804
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #121
Yep. Which is why it is called socialized medicine.Imagine if we had universal healthcare? No employer would be stuck with the burden of their employees healthFor an employer, adding a health insurance benefit is very costly. If an employer cannot afford that cost, are they really a rat bastard for trying to find ways out of having to eat it?Somehow Democrats want to keep working folks limited to just 30
hours? Denying them the ability to earn enough to live on?
Who is limiting workers to 30 hours?
Democrats or employers trying to duck providing healthcare?
They may be faced with only two choices. Go out of business and everyone loses their jobs, or cut back the hours to avoid the cost they cannot afford.
But that would be........SOCIALISM
And the fact is that taxpayers would be stuck with the burden. Health care does not magically become free just because someone else is paying your bill.
Very true
And a persons health is the most valuable thing they have. Most industrialized nations have figured that out