Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 24,387
- 14,331
- 1,415
Yeah, you may want to re-read that rule.
You may want to explain what the hell you are talking about
Still talking about the Reid Rule.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, you may want to re-read that rule.
You may want to explain what the hell you are talking about
The Reid rule was used for Gorsuch.
Ford sank herself when she remembered one of the other boys at the party. Then that man said this incident including the party never happened.
Gorsuch has nothing to do with Kavanaugh.
And that "man" did NOT say the party never happened. He said he had no memory of it. Of course he wrote a book about how little memory he had of much of anything because he was blackout drunk through those years...and he was a good (drinking) buddy of Kavanaugh's
BastardsThis just in: Kavanaugh is accused of laughing at a Polish joke when he was 14.The way this is progressing is looking good for Kavanaugh and it not only looks like all of the Republicans are getting aboard, but some Democrats as well. Feinstein has utterly failed in this 11th hour debacle, the liar Ford is being increasingly discredited for the liar she is, and nobody else is likely to suddenly appear with some more bogus allegations.
It’s all over but the voting.
"Republicans haven’t officially made the decision to press forward with federal judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, but they appear likely to have the votes to do so.
Three key GOP senators have fallen in line with the arguments put forward by their colleagues. They said that Christine Blasey Ford has been given a chance to share the story of her accusation against Kavanaugh in a hearing setting, and encouraged her to testify — even without the FBI investigation she says must come first."
Analysis | Republicans seem to have the votes to move forward with Brett Kavanaugh
In some small way I hope he nominates a flaming liberal who is then crucified and the nomination withdrawn.Soon as the crypt keeper kicks the bucket. Trump can appoint another conservative.
Kind of makes sense, juveniles are held to a different standard.So I just heard on Fox News that even if the FBI did investigate they only go back to age 18. The democrats have made a grave miscalculation! Kavanaugh was 17 at the time of his alleged crime!
The Reid rule was used for Gorsuch.
Ford sank herself when she remembered one of the other boys at the party. Then that man said this incident including the party never happened.
Gorsuch has nothing to do with Kavanaugh.
And that "man" did NOT say the party never happened. He said he had no memory of it. Of course he wrote a book about how little memory he had of much of anything because he was blackout drunk through those years...and he was a good (drinking) buddy of Kavanaugh's
he's been vetted by the FBI 6 times. funny and the extreme-radical left keep forgetting that part and ONLY pay attention your fictitious (to this point) scenario.Republicans should absolutely rush him through without proper vetting. That's worked out so well for them in the past. It wouldn't be at all embarrassing if he has to be impeached when reporters uncover more young women that Bart O'Kavanaugh sexually assaulted.
Looking good for Kavanaugh but looking terrible for the American people.The way this is progressing is looking good for Kavanaugh and it not only looks like all of the Republicans are getting aboard, but some Democrats as well. Feinstein has utterly failed in this 11th hour debacle, the liar Ford is being increasingly discredited for the liar she is, and nobody else is likely to suddenly appear with some more bogus allegations.
It’s all over but the voting.
"Republicans haven’t officially made the decision to press forward with federal judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, but they appear likely to have the votes to do so.
Three key GOP senators have fallen in line with the arguments put forward by their colleagues. They said that Christine Blasey Ford has been given a chance to share the story of her accusation against Kavanaugh in a hearing setting, and encouraged her to testify — even without the FBI investigation she says must come first."
Analysis | Republicans seem to have the votes to move forward with Brett Kavanaugh
Maybe you are trying to vet the wrong person!Republicans should absolutely rush him through without proper vetting. That's worked out so well for them in the past. It wouldn't be at all embarrassing if he has to be impeached when reporters uncover more young women that Bart O'Kavanaugh sexually assaulted.
vetted 6 times and none of this has come up. funny how the left demands their swiss cheese stories are believed and if not, they make up shit about you to demonize you.Looking good for Kavanaugh but looking terrible for the American people.The way this is progressing is looking good for Kavanaugh and it not only looks like all of the Republicans are getting aboard, but some Democrats as well. Feinstein has utterly failed in this 11th hour debacle, the liar Ford is being increasingly discredited for the liar she is, and nobody else is likely to suddenly appear with some more bogus allegations.
It’s all over but the voting.
"Republicans haven’t officially made the decision to press forward with federal judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, but they appear likely to have the votes to do so.
Three key GOP senators have fallen in line with the arguments put forward by their colleagues. They said that Christine Blasey Ford has been given a chance to share the story of her accusation against Kavanaugh in a hearing setting, and encouraged her to testify — even without the FBI investigation she says must come first."
Analysis | Republicans seem to have the votes to move forward with Brett Kavanaugh
Republicans know she’s telling the truth. That’s why they’re trying to block any FBI investigation. And why they’re withholding tens of thousands of documents. They’re afraid that something else will be found out.
We know he lies, we know he gambles. We have to face the fact that most right wingers are just sleazy people.
he's been vetted by the FBI 6 times. funny and the extreme-radical left keep forgetting that part and ONLY pay attention your fictitious (to this point) scenario.Republicans should absolutely rush him through without proper vetting. That's worked out so well for them in the past. It wouldn't be at all embarrassing if he has to be impeached when reporters uncover more young women that Bart O'Kavanaugh sexually assaulted.
he's been vetted by the FBI 6 times. funny and the extreme-radical left keep forgetting that part and ONLY pay attention your fictitious (to this point) scenario.Republicans should absolutely rush him through without proper vetting. That's worked out so well for them in the past. It wouldn't be at all embarrassing if he has to be impeached when reporters uncover more young women that Bart O'Kavanaugh sexually assaulted.
You obviously have no experience with background investigations. They didn't talk to her the previous six times. If they don't know to ask the questions, you don't get answers. It took three days for the FBI to investigate for Anita Hill.
Look at it through a logical lens. One side wants an investigation the other does not. One side actually put a witness in the room ( a witness, I might add that refuses to testify). If this were a case with zero political ramifications, who would you believe was telling the truth?
Nominate him and then shove it up the liberals asses
they also didn't find a reason or need to talk to her now.he's been vetted by the FBI 6 times. funny and the extreme-radical left keep forgetting that part and ONLY pay attention your fictitious (to this point) scenario.Republicans should absolutely rush him through without proper vetting. That's worked out so well for them in the past. It wouldn't be at all embarrassing if he has to be impeached when reporters uncover more young women that Bart O'Kavanaugh sexually assaulted.
You obviously have no experience with background investigations. They didn't talk to her the previous six times. If they don't know to ask the questions, you don't get answers. It took three days for the FBI to investigate for Anita Hill.
Look at it through a logical lens. One side wants an investigation the other does not. One side actually put a witness in the room ( a witness, I might add that refuses to testify). If this were a case with zero political ramifications, who would you believe was telling the truth?