Republican Congressmen want to help fraudsters rip off seniors...

[Vast LWC]

Republicans Who Voted Against Senior Fraud Protection Legislation

Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn (TN)
Boehner (OH)
Bono Mack
Brady (TX)
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Burgess (TX)
Burton (IN)
Buyer (IN)
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cantor (VA)
Carter (TX)
Chaffetz (UT)
Coble (NC)
Coffman (CO)
Conaway (TX)
Duncan (TN)
Flake (AZ)
Fleming (LA)
Foxx (NC)
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gingrey (GA)
Goodlatte (VA)
Graves (GA)
Hastings (WA)
Hensarling (TX)
Herger (CA)
Hunter (CA)
Inglis (SC)
Issa (CA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
Kingston (GA)
Lamborn (CO)
Latta (OH)
Lummis (WY)
Mack (FL)
Manzullo (IL)
Marchant (TX)
McCarthy (CA
McClintock (CA)
McKeon (CA)
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (CA)
Myrick (NC)
Nunes (CA)
Olson (TX)
Paul (TX)
Roskam (IL)
Royce (CA)
Pence (IN)
Petri (WI)
Price (GA)
Radanovich
Roe (TN)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher)
Ryan (WI)
Schmidt (OH)
Sensenbrenner (WI)
Simpson (ID)
Stearns (FL)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry (TX)
Tiberi (OH)
Upton (MI)
Walden (OR)
Westmoreland (GA)
Wilson (SC)
Young (AK)

Really? They're so dead set on undermining the Democrats that they vote against legislation to protect seniors from fraud?

Wow. Good Work!

 

[DiveCon]

Republicans Who Voted Against Senior Fraud Protection Legislation

Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn (TN)
Boehner (OH)
Bono Mack
Brady (TX)
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Burgess (TX)
Burton (IN)
Buyer (IN)
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cantor (VA)
Carter (TX)
Chaffetz (UT)
Coble (NC)
Coffman (CO)
Conaway (TX)
Duncan (TN)
Flake (AZ)
Fleming (LA)
Foxx (NC)
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gingrey (GA)
Goodlatte (VA)
Graves (GA)
Hastings (WA)
Hensarling (TX)
Herger (CA)
Hunter (CA)
Inglis (SC)
Issa (CA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
Kingston (GA)
Lamborn (CO)
Latta (OH)
Lummis (WY)
Mack (FL)
Manzullo (IL)
Marchant (TX)
McCarthy (CA
McClintock (CA)
McKeon (CA)
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (CA)
Myrick (NC)
Nunes (CA)
Olson (TX)
Paul (TX)
Roskam (IL)
Royce (CA)
Pence (IN)
Petri (WI)
Price (GA)
Radanovich
Roe (TN)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher)
Ryan (WI)
Schmidt (OH)
Sensenbrenner (WI)
Simpson (ID)
Stearns (FL)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry (TX)
Tiberi (OH)
Upton (MI)
Walden (OR)
Westmoreland (GA)
Wilson (SC)
Young (AK)

Really? They're so dead set on undermining the Democrats that they vote against legislation to protect seniors from fraud?

Wow. Good Work!

wow, major stretch there
what was in the bill?
you realize that just because it had been named that, it might have been just the opposite?

 

[Yurt]

another dishonest thread by vastly incompetent

 

[Avatar4321]

Heaven forbid we actually look at what's in the bill. We just need to assume that since someone voted against something with that name, they are evil.

Why are you on the left so focused on image instead of reality?

 

[Dr.House]

Yay!

Another "Republicans want to push your grandma down the stairs" thread!

Yay!

 

[Charles_Main]

Heaven forbid we actually look at what's in the bill. We just need to assume that since someone voted against something with that name, they are evil.

Why are you on the left so focused on image instead of reality?

Same reason the Dems in the House have changed the requirement from 218 Votes to 290 Votes on the Bill to help 9/11 Victims families. They have 255 Votes and could pass it, But have chose instead to change the required votes to 290 so the bill will not pass, and they can Blame republican Opposition to it. Republicans do Oppose some parts of the Bill, but the point is that Dems COULD PASS IT RIGHT NOW IF THEY WANTED.

Shameless Partisan Political Games, when they could pass it if they wanted. Because Dems are worried about Image, not issues.

 

[rightwinger]

Yay!

Another "Republicans want to push your grandma down the stairs" thread!

Yay!

If they do......grandma better not expect any healthcare

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We had to vote for the bill to see what was in it.

Yes, that's the problem, there's just not enough government oversight

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yay!

Another "Republicans want to push your grandma down the stairs" thread!

Yay!

If they do......grandma better not expect any healthcare

Good point because according to Obama's Eugenicist Ezekiel Emanuel, she's lived her allotted Life Years

 

[Vast LWC]

What's the matter boys, can't take your own talking point medicine?

Yeah, the post doesn't tell the whole story, it's a talking point.

How did you like your own tactics being thrown back at you?

Yeah boyee. Hit and run Spinimeister thread!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Book of FDR 3:16 For he that haveth faith in Big Gubbamint shall live forever and never die

 

[Vast LWC]

Remember "Death Panels"?

Suck it!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Heaven forbid we actually look at what's in the bill. We just need to assume that since someone voted against something with that name, they are evil.

Why are you on the left so focused on image instead of reality?

Same reason the Dems in the House have changed the requirement from 218 Votes to 290 Votes on the Bill to help 9/11 Victims families. They have 255 Votes and could pass it, But have chose instead to change the required votes to 290 so the bill will not pass, and they can Blame republican Opposition to it. Republicans do Oppose some parts of the Bill, but the point is that Dems COULD PASS IT RIGHT NOW IF THEY WANTED.

Shameless Partisan Political Games, when they could pass it if they wanted. Because Dems are worried about Image, not issues.

The 290 votes refers to a parlimentary procedure which blocks amendments. They put that into place to prevent Republicans from tacking on unrelated amendments onto a widely popular bill. It's going to pass anyway.

 

[Yurt]

What's the matter boys, can't take your own talking point medicine?

Yeah, the post doesn't tell the whole story, it's a talking point.

How did you like your own tactics being thrown back at you?

Yeah boyee. Hit and run Spinimeister thread!

i don't do that....but nice of you to admit you're nothing but a troll with this

hey mommy.....they did it tooo!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dems are protecting Seniors so they can be handed over to Ezekiel Emanuel

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Republicans Who Voted Against Senior Fraud Protection Legislation

Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn (TN)
Boehner (OH)
Bono Mack
Brady (TX)
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Burgess (TX)
Burton (IN)
Buyer (IN)
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cantor (VA)
Carter (TX)
Chaffetz (UT)
Coble (NC)
Coffman (CO)
Conaway (TX)
Duncan (TN)
Flake (AZ)
Fleming (LA)
Foxx (NC)
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gingrey (GA)
Goodlatte (VA)
Graves (GA)
Hastings (WA)
Hensarling (TX)
Herger (CA)
Hunter (CA)
Inglis (SC)
Issa (CA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
Kingston (GA)
Lamborn (CO)
Latta (OH)
Lummis (WY)
Mack (FL)
Manzullo (IL)
Marchant (TX)
McCarthy (CA
McClintock (CA)
McKeon (CA)
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (CA)
Myrick (NC)
Nunes (CA)
Olson (TX)
Paul (TX)
Roskam (IL)
Royce (CA)
Pence (IN)
Petri (WI)
Price (GA)
Radanovich
Roe (TN)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher)
Ryan (WI)
Schmidt (OH)
Sensenbrenner (WI)
Simpson (ID)
Stearns (FL)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry (TX)
Tiberi (OH)
Upton (MI)
Walden (OR)
Westmoreland (GA)
Wilson (SC)
Young (AK)

Really? They're so dead set on undermining the Democrats that they vote against legislation to protect seniors from fraud?

Wow. Good Work!

Rhetoric. We have to see the bill.

 

[DiveCon]

Heaven forbid we actually look at what's in the bill. We just need to assume that since someone voted against something with that name, they are evil.

Why are you on the left so focused on image instead of reality?

Same reason the Dems in the House have changed the requirement from 218 Votes to 290 Votes on the Bill to help 9/11 Victims families. They have 255 Votes and could pass it, But have chose instead to change the required votes to 290 so the bill will not pass, and they can Blame republican Opposition to it. Republicans do Oppose some parts of the Bill, but the point is that Dems COULD PASS IT RIGHT NOW IF THEY WANTED.

Shameless Partisan Political Games, when they could pass it if they wanted. Because Dems are worried about Image, not issues.

The 290 votes refers to a parlimentary procedure which blocks amendments. They put that into place to prevent Republicans from tacking on unrelated amendments onto a widely popular bill. It's going to pass anyway.

that makes no sense
since they already have a majority, how could repubs add anything without at least SOME democrat votes?

 

[Ringel05]

What's the matter boys, can't take your own talking point medicine?

Yeah, the post doesn't tell the whole story, it's a talking point.

How did you like your own tactics being thrown back at you?

Yeah boyee. Hit and run Spinimeister thread!

So. You're saying you've never see this tactic used by anyone other than the right?
Okie dokie........

 

[Vast LWC]

i don't do that....but nice of you to admit you're nothing but a troll with this

hey mommy.....they did it tooo!!!

Feh...

Every once in a while I like to show folks how ridiculous they look.

At least I admit to doing it. Some people do it and then just repeat themselves over and over when confronted.

 

[Vast LWC]

What's the matter boys, can't take your own talking point medicine?

Yeah, the post doesn't tell the whole story, it's a talking point.

How did you like your own tactics being thrown back at you?

Yeah boyee. Hit and run Spinimeister thread!

So. You're saying you've never see this tactic used by anyone other than the right?
Okie dokie........

When were the words "the right" mentioned in that post?