Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Apparently as the bodies were still cooling in San Bernardino, Obama convened a meeting of law enforcement agencies. But the purpose wasn't to catch the terrorists. It was to plan a strategy to fool Americans into thinking it wasn't terrorism.
Though the FBI knew immediately that it was terrorism, Obama apparently objected to the conclusion. No explanation has been given for his reluctance. For Obama, putting the right "spin" on the reports came before enforcing the law and identifying the terrorists and their cohorts.
When the FBI eventually yielded to overwhelming evidence and announced it was terrorism anyway, the Obama administration's first reaction was to threaten to prosecute ordinary Americans who said anything bad about Muslims.
------------------------------------------------
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
by Jonah Bennett
4:52 PM 12/10/2015
The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.
A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.
This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.
Part of the reason for trying to avoid the designation of the shootings as terrorism is because it threatens to upset the Obama administration’s strategy in Syria. A case of Islamic terrorism in the U.S. would put additional pressure on the administration to play a much more active role in the conflict.
But in this case, because the preponderance evidence so pointed to terrorism, the FBI’s hand was forced, and the agency declared the existence of a terrorism investigation, going against top-down priorities from the White House. Syed Rizwan Farook, the shooter, had contact with ISIS and other groups.
In response, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Department of Justice was ready and waiting to prosecute people engaging in “anti-Muslim” rhetoric.
Michael Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said publicly that the Obama administration wants to completely sideline discussion of terrorism, because it contradicts the claim that al-Qaida is dwindling. Obama recently suffered major embarrassment after he claimed that ISIS was contained, only one day before the Paris attacks took place.
Though the FBI knew immediately that it was terrorism, Obama apparently objected to the conclusion. No explanation has been given for his reluctance. For Obama, putting the right "spin" on the reports came before enforcing the law and identifying the terrorists and their cohorts.
When the FBI eventually yielded to overwhelming evidence and announced it was terrorism anyway, the Obama administration's first reaction was to threaten to prosecute ordinary Americans who said anything bad about Muslims.
------------------------------------------------
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
by Jonah Bennett
4:52 PM 12/10/2015
The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.
A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.
This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.
Part of the reason for trying to avoid the designation of the shootings as terrorism is because it threatens to upset the Obama administration’s strategy in Syria. A case of Islamic terrorism in the U.S. would put additional pressure on the administration to play a much more active role in the conflict.
But in this case, because the preponderance evidence so pointed to terrorism, the FBI’s hand was forced, and the agency declared the existence of a terrorism investigation, going against top-down priorities from the White House. Syed Rizwan Farook, the shooter, had contact with ISIS and other groups.
In response, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Department of Justice was ready and waiting to prosecute people engaging in “anti-Muslim” rhetoric.
Michael Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said publicly that the Obama administration wants to completely sideline discussion of terrorism, because it contradicts the claim that al-Qaida is dwindling. Obama recently suffered major embarrassment after he claimed that ISIS was contained, only one day before the Paris attacks took place.
