Rep. Ilhan Omar Pushes Anti-Israel Resolution

Should Ilhan Omar's Anti-Israel Resolution come to pass in Congress?

  • Yes, because the Democrats are in command in Congress and should make their anti-Antisemitism known.

    Votes: 9 42.9%
  • No, because boycotts of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union nearly led to genocide of the Jewish race.

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • No opinion

    Votes: 7 33.3%

  • Total voters
    21
The right to boycott.

We have the right to boycott every other country.... except the CHOSEN....

Why the double standard?

Why don't you treasonous fuckheads who care only about ISRAEL get THE FUCK OUT OF THE US and MOVE TO ISRAEL?

who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.

"islamophobe"? clueless again. I learned about islam from muslims.
I learned about what goes on in mosques, IN MOSQUES. Feel free to
ask questions.


No, you are a bigot and ignorant because if you really knew much about Islam or Judaism, you would realize they are identical. The customs and rituals are the same. Like Kosher and Halal being identical.

feel free to ask questions-----kosher and halal are not the same---BY A LONG SHOT. How did you become so stupid?

On what basis do you make such an outrageous lie?
There is no fundamental difference.
Both are attempts to implement the exact same Old Testament.
 
The right to boycott.

We have the right to boycott every other country.... except the CHOSEN....

Why the double standard?

Why don't you treasonous fuckheads who care only about ISRAEL get THE FUCK OUT OF THE US and MOVE TO ISRAEL?

who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.
 
The right to boycott.

We have the right to boycott every other country.... except the CHOSEN....

Why the double standard?

Why don't you treasonous fuckheads who care only about ISRAEL get THE FUCK OUT OF THE US and MOVE TO ISRAEL?

who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.
Islamphobia is club to intimidate people and stop legitimate criticism of Islam. Fear of Islam is based on fact, not phobia.
Here are some dead. They had every reason to be terrified.
Other Recent "Misunderstandings
of Islam"
2019.08.12 (Philippines)
A 2-year-old child is among three killed by Abu Sayyaf gunmen. 2019.08.11 (Nigeria)
Boko Haram murder two men and cut the ears off one women. 2019.08.10 (Libya)
Three UN staffers are felled by a car bomb blast outside a mall. 2019.08.08 (Israel)
A 19-year-old seminary student is stabbed to death by terrorists. 2019.08.07 (Syria)
Three chilrden are among five disassembled by an ISIS car bomb. 2019.08.07 (Afghanistan)
A massive suicide blast in a Shiite neighborhood leaves over a dozen dead.
(Note: Data for each attack is sometimes pulled from multiple sources. The provided link may not be in complete agreement with the updated detail for the incident).
Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth
 
The right to boycott.

We have the right to boycott every other country.... except the CHOSEN....

Why the double standard?

Why don't you treasonous fuckheads who care only about ISRAEL get THE FUCK OUT OF THE US and MOVE TO ISRAEL?

who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.
Islamphobia is club to intimidate people and stop legitimate criticism of Islam. Fear of Islam is based on fact, not phobia.
Here are some dead. They had every reason to be terrified.
Other Recent "Misunderstandings
of Islam"
2019.08.12 (Philippines)
A 2-year-old child is among three killed by Abu Sayyaf gunmen. 2019.08.11 (Nigeria)
Boko Haram murder two men and cut the ears off one women. 2019.08.10 (Libya)
Three UN staffers are felled by a car bomb blast outside a mall. 2019.08.08 (Israel)
A 19-year-old seminary student is stabbed to death by terrorists. 2019.08.07 (Syria)
Three chilrden are among five disassembled by an ISIS car bomb. 2019.08.07 (Afghanistan)
A massive suicide blast in a Shiite neighborhood leaves over a dozen dead.
(Note: Data for each attack is sometimes pulled from multiple sources. The provided link may not be in complete agreement with the updated detail for the incident).
Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth

It is Israel that is murdering, intimidating, and stealing homes, not any Muslim group.
 
who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg

you have been HEAVILY influenced by the NATIONALIST SOCIALIST ISLAMIST BULLSHIT party-----aka Baathists.
The only "arabs" in the world back then were those living in
ARABIA and a few nomads (very few) who had wondered about
the area involved in their slave trading. They were called ARAVIM
or ISHMAELIM. All those other people you describe were nations of their own------like the SIOUX in North America. and the Mayans in
South America. Most are no longer extant at all. Jews were native
to the land that the greeks LATER dubbed "palestina" and remain extant. ------as to OWNERSHIP of land-----nomads own no land. ----
interestingly enough----the people called ISHMAELIM---historically are DEFINED as people who own no land, or permanent housing and
are illiterate. Your fellows also considered themselves the owners of
all fine art that existed in die vaterland. Did you EVER buy or sell land in the USA? Go to your municipal court and explain YOUR definition of land ownership.
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.

"islamophobe"? clueless again. I learned about islam from muslims.
I learned about what goes on in mosques, IN MOSQUES. Feel free to
ask questions.


No, you are a bigot and ignorant because if you really knew much about Islam or Judaism, you would realize they are identical. The customs and rituals are the same. Like Kosher and Halal being identical.

feel free to ask questions-----kosher and halal are not the same---BY A LONG SHOT. How did you become so stupid?

On what basis do you make such an outrageous lie?
There is no fundamental difference.
Both are attempts to implement the exact same Old Testament.

you have never read the Old Testament or the Koran. You depend
on the "explanations" of historical fiction writers. Feel free to ask questions and meanwhile----have a camel burger
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.
Islamphobia is club to intimidate people and stop legitimate criticism of Islam. Fear of Islam is based on fact, not phobia.
Here are some dead. They had every reason to be terrified.
Other Recent "Misunderstandings
of Islam"
2019.08.12 (Philippines)
A 2-year-old child is among three killed by Abu Sayyaf gunmen. 2019.08.11 (Nigeria)
Boko Haram murder two men and cut the ears off one women. 2019.08.10 (Libya)
Three UN staffers are felled by a car bomb blast outside a mall. 2019.08.08 (Israel)
A 19-year-old seminary student is stabbed to death by terrorists. 2019.08.07 (Syria)
Three chilrden are among five disassembled by an ISIS car bomb. 2019.08.07 (Afghanistan)
A massive suicide blast in a Shiite neighborhood leaves over a dozen dead.
(Note: Data for each attack is sometimes pulled from multiple sources. The provided link may not be in complete agreement with the updated detail for the incident).
Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth

It is Israel that is murdering, intimidating, and stealing homes, not any Muslim group.
That is a lie. Next.
 
who is "WE"? any boycott is quite an issue. Boycott is the newspeak term for
the old-fashioned warfare technique of STARVATION SIEGE


That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg
The Koran says Israel belongs to the Jews. Did you know that?
 
That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg
The Koran says Israel belongs to the Jews. Did you know that?

He did not read the Koran-----in fact MOST muslims never read it. (then again
most Christians did not read the NT----but a much higher percentage of Christians
had than muslims have read the Koran) There are muslims who never read the Koran because it is not translated into their language until VERY recently-----and
lots more who are simply illiterate---HOWEVER even well educated muslims never
read it. They know what the IMAM tells them on Friday. I read the silly book----
~~ 50 years ago I thought I had found something NEW-----allah wants all da
jooos to GO TO DA PROMISED LAND (aka tel aviv) But keep in mind----
that was during the time that Muhummad wanted to be KING OF ARABIA----
his mind had not yet been set on WORLD CONQUEST. ----now be quiet---you are disturbing the world view of lots of people
 
That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg

you have been HEAVILY influenced by the NATIONALIST SOCIALIST ISLAMIST BULLSHIT party-----aka Baathists.
The only "arabs" in the world back then were those living in
ARABIA and a few nomads (very few) who had wondered about
the area involved in their slave trading. They were called ARAVIM
or ISHMAELIM. All those other people you describe were nations of their own------like the SIOUX in North America. and the Mayans in
South America. Most are no longer extant at all. Jews were native
to the land that the greeks LATER dubbed "palestina" and remain extant. ------as to OWNERSHIP of land-----nomads own no land. ----
interestingly enough----the people called ISHMAELIM---historically are DEFINED as people who own no land, or permanent housing and
are illiterate. Your fellows also considered themselves the owners of
all fine art that existed in die vaterland. Did you EVER buy or sell land in the USA? Go to your municipal court and explain YOUR definition of land ownership.

That is ridiculously silly.
Even the Old Testament says that Arab are of Ishmael, one of the Sons of Abraham.
{...
Ishmael, Abraham's first son, was born of Hagar, Sarah’s Egyptian maidservant, at the prompting of Sarah herself. Ishmael was a child of favor,
...
Ishmael's Accomplishments
Ishmael grew to become a skilled hunter and expert archer. As promised, the Lord made Ishmael fruitful. He fathered twelve princes who formed the nomadic Arab nations.

Ishmael helped Isaac bury his father Abraham and lived to be 137 years old.
...}

Arabs do NOT come from the Arabian Peninsula.
The came from the Levant, and some went to the Arabian Peninsula from there.
The Egyptians, Palestinians, Lebanese, Jordanians, and Syrians are all Arab, and not just the Saudis.
In fact, about the only people near the Levant who are not Arabs, are the Persian Iranians, Black Kushites in Somalia, Libyan Berbers, and the Turks.
All the original tribes of the Mideast, like the Hebrew, Akkadians, Urites, Canaanites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Philistines, etc., are all Arabs. (The Philistines have some Greek influence, but since they spoke a Semtic Arab language, they most likely were mostly Arab.)
And Arabs traditionally are NOT at all nomadic.
They have this thing about honoring the place where the bones of their ancestors are buried.

And no, the Jews are descendants of Hebrew, and while the Hebrew are Arabs, they left no trace at all of where they came from. The Old Testament says Egypt, but nothing before that. No one has any idea. And they most certainly had nothing at all to do with Palestina, which was inhabited by the People of the Sea. The Hebrew were never known to every build, own, or operate ships at all, so would never have lived on the coast in Palestina.

The owner of land is the one who pays and gets a deed recorded.
Jews and Hebrew has no record of ever paying for any land at all.
They only claim the right of the Chosen People and their Promised Land, which is all clearly a made up lie that even Netanyahu does not actually believe in.
 
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.

"islamophobe"? clueless again. I learned about islam from muslims.
I learned about what goes on in mosques, IN MOSQUES. Feel free to
ask questions.


No, you are a bigot and ignorant because if you really knew much about Islam or Judaism, you would realize they are identical. The customs and rituals are the same. Like Kosher and Halal being identical.

feel free to ask questions-----kosher and halal are not the same---BY A LONG SHOT. How did you become so stupid?

On what basis do you make such an outrageous lie?
There is no fundamental difference.
Both are attempts to implement the exact same Old Testament.

you have never read the Old Testament or the Koran. You depend
on the "explanations" of historical fiction writers. Feel free to ask questions and meanwhile----have a camel burger

It is impossible to grow up in the US without having read the Old Testament, and the Quran is easy to read because it is such simple sentence structure, although I have only read about half of it so far. Only problem is that is it a little boring.

As to your camel burger attempt to differeniate between Kosher and Halal, the Jews simply are obviously mistaken.
Here is some of the Old Testament on what is Kosher.
{...
Based on scriptural analysis the prohibition of consuming camel meat only occured in 2 places in the Torah:

  • ("The LORD said to Moses and Aaron, ‘Say to the Israelites: "Of all the animals that live on land, these are the ones you may eat: You may eat any animal that has a split hoof completely divided and that chews the cud. There are some that only chew the cud or only have a split hoof, but you must not eat them. The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a split hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you."’" Leviticus 11:1-4)
  • ("Do not eat any detestable thing. These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the roe deer, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep. You may eat any animal that has a split hoof divided in two and that chews the cud. However, of those that chew the cud or that have a split hoof completely divided you may not eat the camel, the rabbit or the coney. Although they chew the cud, they do not have a split hoof; they are ceremonially unclean for you." Deuteronomy 14:3-7)
...}
But clearly the Jews are wrong about what it Kosher because the camel clearly DOES have a split hoof.

lives_niger03.jpg
 
you are clueless. There was nothing wrong with the order or progression of
my post---You did not like the "PROBABLY'-----ok-----Ilhan DEFINITELY licked her
jew hate shit off the floor of mosques. ALL muslim dogs and muslimah bitches
do. I did not START with an opinion-----I read that which she wrote and
RECOGNIZED it for what it is. ---------I am not inexperienced in that which gets flung around in mosques
Just like I thought.

A bigot is as a bigot does.

Carry on Islamophobe.
Islamphobia is club to intimidate people and stop legitimate criticism of Islam. Fear of Islam is based on fact, not phobia.
Here are some dead. They had every reason to be terrified.
Other Recent "Misunderstandings
of Islam"
2019.08.12 (Philippines)
A 2-year-old child is among three killed by Abu Sayyaf gunmen. 2019.08.11 (Nigeria)
Boko Haram murder two men and cut the ears off one women. 2019.08.10 (Libya)
Three UN staffers are felled by a car bomb blast outside a mall. 2019.08.08 (Israel)
A 19-year-old seminary student is stabbed to death by terrorists. 2019.08.07 (Syria)
Three chilrden are among five disassembled by an ISIS car bomb. 2019.08.07 (Afghanistan)
A massive suicide blast in a Shiite neighborhood leaves over a dozen dead.
(Note: Data for each attack is sometimes pulled from multiple sources. The provided link may not be in complete agreement with the updated detail for the incident).
Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth

It is Israel that is murdering, intimidating, and stealing homes, not any Muslim group.
That is a lie. Next.

Who blew up the King David hotel and murdered about 100 innocents?
Who assassinated the UN moderator, Swedish Count, Folke Bernadotte?
Who kidnapped, mutilated, and mudered innocents in the Sargeant's Affair?
Who massacred Arab men, women, and children in innocent Arab villages like Dier Yassin?
 
That is not at all true, because if Israel was honest and hard working, they not only could produce all they need themselves, but could trade with neighbors.
But instead Israel refuses to uphold rights or anything else that would allow for normal economic relations.
Israel is demanding billions a year from the US, for free, without being earned or even upholding even the most minimal standards of decent civilized behavior.
For example, it is a war crime for Israel not allowing the right of return to those natives who fled the violence in 1948.
It is immoral, illegal, and beyond acceptable.

wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg
The Koran says Israel belongs to the Jews. Did you know that?

No it does not.
In fact, the Bible does not either.
You do not own land unless you or your ancestors payed for it.
Jews never purchased any significant portion of Israel.

At the time of Mohammad, no Jews lived in what is now Israel at all, and they were all bound by the Diaspora decree and implications of atonement.
 
wrong again-----division of lands between hostile parties has a LONG AND HONORABLE history. You have been propagandized------are the hundreds of \
thousands of jews who fled the filth of shariah also ENTITLED?. The city now called "medina" was once a jewish city---Yathrib----are jews eligible to RETAKE that city? My very own hubby was rescued from a part of a SHARIAH SHIT HOLE-----that just happens to be very rich in Oil-------when do I get my OIL WELL?

Wrong!
It is never legal, honorable, or anything but criminal to take land from one party and give it to an illegal immigrant party who simply has better weapons.
With a division of land between those in a hostile dispute, that is only legal when both sides have actual legal rights.
But since only Arabs ever owned, purchased, or inhabited those lands for thousands of years, then all the Jewish immigrants of the last century who did not buy any land, have ZERO rights, interests, or anything at all.

A city called Medina may have been invaded in the past by Hebrew nomads, but that gives them no rights at all, and less then ZERO for their descendants now. When you voluntarily abandon land, (not forced by threats), then you give up any rights you may have had. And the Hebrew invaders had no rights to the land to begin with.

No one is entitled to anything given to them or taken from others by force.
You have to either find abandoned land, or buy it.
Israelis did neither and deserve nothing but punishment for their thefts.

your post makes no sense at all--------and actually demonstrates your extreme
IGNORANCE. Hebrews INVADED land in Arabia? When did that happen---
LAND OWNERSHIP as a concept does not exist amongst nomadic tribes.
In fact there are some "arabs" in the Sinai----who ACCORDING TO YOU
INVADED more than 2000 years ago. As to land ownership----in palestina----your ignorance is so dense----that there is no hope------fact is people called
"arabs" "owned" by purchase---virtually nothing----The only people who OWNED by purchase were------JEWS and a bit in Jerusalem by the ARMENIAN church.
Did you fail finger math in the first grade. -----were you in the reading group for
dummies?

That is silly.
Around 1000 BC, when the Hebrew tribes invaded the Land of Canaan, now called Israel and Palestine, it was almost entirely inhabited by Arabs. Canaanites are Arabs, as are Akkadians, Amorites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc. that all lived in the Levant when the Hebrew tribes invaded. The Hebrew tribes are also Arabs, but they are not native to the Levant.
Arabs are not nomadic usually. The only nomadic Arabs are the Hebrew and the Bedouins.

As far as land ownership, the Arabs own almost all the land in Israel.
That is why the Zionists refuse to allow them to return.
They would have to give back all they stole.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia

Look at the map. Jews purchased less than 5% of Israel.

Palestine_Index_to_Villages_and_Settlements%2C_showing_Land_in_Jewish_Possession_as_at_31.12.44.jpg
The Koran says Israel belongs to the Jews. Did you know that?

He did not read the Koran-----in fact MOST muslims never read it. (then again
most Christians did not read the NT----but a much higher percentage of Christians
had than muslims have read the Koran) There are muslims who never read the Koran because it is not translated into their language until VERY recently-----and
lots more who are simply illiterate---HOWEVER even well educated muslims never
read it. They know what the IMAM tells them on Friday. I read the silly book----
~~ 50 years ago I thought I had found something NEW-----allah wants all da
jooos to GO TO DA PROMISED LAND (aka tel aviv) But keep in mind----
that was during the time that Muhummad wanted to be KING OF ARABIA----
his mind had not yet been set on WORLD CONQUEST. ----now be quiet---you are disturbing the world view of lots of people

Wrong.
The Quran says that the Jews should go to the Land of Canaan as the Promised Land after leaving Egypt, but they were not supposed to murder all the Canaanites and rule the land by force. They were supposed to live there peacefully with the Canaaties, so the Jews forfeit any opportunity there at all.
 
I do not support Representative Omar' proposed law because I believe the issue regarding the federal banning of the right for a state to boycott Israel should be settled by the Supreme Court in accordance with the Constitution and not through her legislation.

US Rep. Ilhan Omar proposed a resolution this week supporting the right to boycott Israel, likening the boycott of the Jewish state to boycotts of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

Omar’s resolution seeks to push back against US laws banning the boycott of Israel and affirms the right of Americans to organize boycotts of foreign countries if they wish.

Link: https://nypost.com/2019/07/18/ilhan-omar-proposes-resolution-supporting-boycott-of-israel/
I've not informed myself enough on the constitutional arguments to have strong opinion, my instinct says this should be treated like treaties and side with laws banning international boycotts by state and local governments.
 
what does "anti-Israel" even mean?

Is that not self-explanatory?
No, it's not.

The statement doesn't make any sense.

Unless someone outright states that they want to see Israel destroyed, then they're not anti-Israel.

How do you know what's in a person's heart?
By examining one's efforts and actions and words... not 100% reliable... but damned close... close enough for Gubmint work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top