sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
Not what happened. They specifically and secretly strapped a pro-life group with a porn site block. Seriously grow up. This is getting sadBanning folks for breaking the TOS is not a "shadow ban".Pinterest Bans Live Action, Fires WhistleblowerNone of that is any company admitting to shadow banning anyone. Whoever told you it was lied to you.Wow this is al common knowledge, but I guess not to anyone who lives under an echo chamber rock. Which is still crazy to me because the left is actually encouraging and requesting more of this.Please show me anything that proves they admit to shadow banning anyone.They openly admit it now, wtf are you talking about? And even with their admissions to stuff they previously denied, they are still getting exposed as doing more to silence conservative points of views like labeling them as porn spam. Iâm amazed how effective propaganda is on the left, like the companies themselves are admitting it and doubling down now.
Censorship: Twitter Employee Admits to "Shadow Banning" Conservatives
From this past week...
VERITAS: O'Keefe Busts Pinterest for Censoring Pro-Life Group - Big League Politics
And then YouTube steps in a deletes videos about big tech censorship...
YouTube Deletes Project Veritas Video About Pinterest Censorship
And then YouTube takes down videos of journalists actually talking about YouTube taking down the video on the story
YouTube Censors Tim Pool Video on Project Veritas' Pinterest ExposĂŠ | Breitbart
You have the whole Steven Crowder/Vox/YouTube debacle from 2 weeks ago where a Vox journalists complain about crowder, YouTube does a review of crowder, determine crowder isnât violating any terms of service. Vox cries about that decision, YouTube says âok ok, well demonetize all of his videos even though he didnât violate anything.â Then their CEO comes out and says this...
Google CEO wants to âprevent borderline contentâ even if it âdoesnât exactlyâ break rules
I mean this is all just from this month alone. Nobody on your side is even trying to claim itâs a conspiracy, theyâre saying this is a good thing. Seriously, itâs time to crawl out from under the rock. Since youâve been so vehemently denying this, I assume if you had any objective facilities, youâd say this is all bad...but Iâm not holding my breath hahaha
Ok riddle me this Batman, why is it Pinterest secretly labeled a pro-life group as a porn-site to be blocked, then when they were exposed as doing so, they doubled down and said âwell they spread misinformation so thatâs why weâre blocking them,â. They have a block for misinformation, they did not use it. Nor did they inform live-action of the block. Thatâs shadow-banning. If they wouldâve denied having labeled a pro-life group as a porn site so an error message would pop up instead of showing the content, then youâd have a point they never admitted to it...even though the irrefutable proof of them doing so was released. But at least you could say they never admitted to it. They got caught and just said âwell weâre gonna label them misinformation instead nowâ.
Again itâs the left media sites asking for more censorship. Itâs out in the open. I still donât know wtf you are talking about, or why you think an appropriate rebuttal is just to say ânun-uhâ to clear cut cases of shadow banning and censorship.
YouTubeâs messy fight with its most extreme creators
In Europeâs Election Season, Tech Vies to Fight Fake News
NYT Cheers the Rise of Censorship Algorithms