Registered sex offender shot and killed by a woman with a legally owned gun....what was a better outcome? Let's ask anti-gunners...

How about a nice ice cream cone? What flavour do you like?
Two scoops?

My point has been made. Death is not the preferable outcome in Canada.

Obsess on that until your cows come home.

Got it. You're pretending that death was the preferable outcome here? Given the circumstances, it was a justifiable homicide and the woman was well within her rights to protect and defend herself. Would a woman in Canada get charged with something if the same thing happened to her there?

I have no cows.
 
This criminal continued his attack even after the woman fired a warning shot at him.........you should never fire warning shots...............so she had to fire her gun again and shoot the criminal. He died. He was a long time felon and sex offender.

Now.....the question is.....

For anti-gun extremists....what was the best outcome to this encounter....?

1) the woman is brutally raped, tortured and murdered

2) she shoots and kills the violent criminal

We will wait........and wait..........and wait as tommy, and joe, and Capt. Caveman, and all the other anti-gun extremists ignore the question...because we really, already know their answer.

She should not have had that gun, the guy raping, torturing and murdering her is the best outcome.........this is where the anti-gun extremists fall on this question.




Good riddance to bad rubbish.
 
Deaths by gun is never the best or preferred outcome.

America's gun violence statistics prove that, but Americans refuse to learn from the lessons.

Best wishes from Canada. (we're a civilized country that prefers justice dealth out by the courts, rather than by vigilantes.)



In this case, it was.
 
That's right, no matter how you state it. Death by gun must always be the least favourable choice.

You do Bob and you proclaim it with great emotion.

It comes from your guts because you're forced to compromise your religion for political purpose.
So, you'd be in favor of a homosexual rapist raping you, then killing you and any witnesses to cover up his crime rather than a witness shooting him while the crime was in progress to literally save your ass. I really doubt that you would feel that way if you were the victim of a violent assault.
 
I'm sure you'll think the same when you're being beaten and raped, with easy access to a firearm.
There is an old observation that a conservative is a liberal who has been raped or mugged. Ivory towers tend to disappear when the occupant is the victim of a violent crime.
 
There is an old observation that a conservative is a liberal who has been raped or mugged. Ivory towers tend to disappear when the occupant is the victim of a violent crime.


I think the modern leftist no longer gets Red Pilled by those events....
 
.




How many times do we have to tell you that defending yourself or someone weaker than the killers you love is NOT vigilante?

Fuck what you think of America, BTW.

Cute little post.





.
That little turd lives in a pathetic excuse of a country. He doesn't have a clue about anything. A joke of a country that is doing everything it can do to become a Socialist shithole.

There is only person in the entire country that is smart and has any credibility. That is Frankie McDonald.
 
Express your frustration all you like. I've just pointed out the fact that nobody stepped up to defend their Constitution when a coup attempt was taking place.

Where was Milley? Where was Pence.
Where were all the others who had access to the traitor who was in the process of taking down democracy?

Even more to the point, where were the good guys with a gun?



Ummmm, YOU are the one who is frustrated, dumbass. One of your pet sex criminals got hisself killt. That hurts your tiny little head.
 
It's the comfort of that being many times less likely in Canada, compared to America.

Emotions are boiling over today and now some time is needed for everyone to reflect on the situation(s) that America has created for itself.

vigilante justice is on the rise and the fate of the US Constitution hangs in the balance of a corrupt justice system.
So you admit the justice system is corrupt, eh?
 
This criminal continued his attack even after the woman fired a warning shot at him.........you should never fire warning shots...............so she had to fire her gun again and shoot the criminal. He died. He was a long time felon and sex offender.

Now.....the question is.....

For anti-gun extremists....what was the best outcome to this encounter....?

1) the woman is brutally raped, tortured and murdered

2) she shoots and kills the violent criminal

We will wait........and wait..........and wait as tommy, and joe, and Capt. Caveman, and all the other anti-gun extremists ignore the question...because we really, already know their answer.

She should not have had that gun, the guy raping, torturing and murdering her is the best outcome.........this is where the anti-gun extremists fall on this question.

The outcome already occured. Do you have some kind of a magic rewind button? If not, don't ask stupid questions.
 
That little turd lives in a pathetic excuse of a country. He doesn't have a clue about anything. A joke of a country that is doing everything it can do to become a Socialist shithole.

There is only person in the entire country that is smart and has any credibility. That is Frankie McDonald.


Jordan Peterson too....
 
Jordan Peterson too....
I am not familiar with Peterson but if a hurricane is coming to Florida Frankie is the only person in the world that I have confidence in to give an accurate forecast.

Here is his forecast for Hurricane Hilary heading for California.

 
That's right, no matter how you state it. Death by gun must always be the least favourable choice.

You do Bob and you proclaim it with great emotion.

It comes from your guts because you're forced to compromise your religion for political purpose.
No. Shooting is OK, as long as the right person gets shot.
 
In Canada, death is not the desired outcome. Let that be your guide to your talking points.
Inventing situations for me isn't going to get you anywhere. You're more interested in inventing lies to suit your American dogma.

And I don't even know if you care or not?

It's not here either but if the choice is my ( or my wife's) life or bodily safety and the life and bodily safety of a person attacking me (her) the desired outcome is I (she) walk away and whatever happens to the piece of shit attacking me is his decision. If he sees I have a gun pointed at him and he still comes at me then he chose to commit suicide.
 
In Canada if 3 armed home invaders break in in the middle of the night and you defend yourself and kill one of the pieces of shit you will get charged with murder

Why the fuck would anyone want to live in such a country

 

Forum List

Back
Top