- Thread starter
- #141
Can't tell how crushed I am by your objections to the form of my posts.
What is telling is how you are unable to respond or rebut the essence of same, namely that you are a lock-step automaton, following each and every directive of the socialist commissariat.
Speaking of which....
1. The media bias was clear to all when the JournoList Scandal hit: hundreds of journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obamas radical ties. a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic plotted to fix the damage. Documents show media plotting to kill stories about Rev. Jeremiah Wright | The Daily Caller
a. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obamas relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obamas conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares and call them racists.
b. an anti-Christian culture among those who participated in the Journolist forum. In the context of coordinating this media attack on Sarah Palin, Daniel Levy apparently experienced no hesitation at all in using the word Christian as a characteristic that should be used to scare people: This seems to me like an occasion when the non-official campaign has a big role to play in defining Palin, shaping the terms of the conversation and saying things that the official [Obama] campaign shouldnt say very hard-hitting stuff, including some of the things that people have been noting here scare people about having this woefully inexperienced, no foreign policy/national security/right-wing christia[n] wing-nut a heartbeat away bang away at McCains age making this unusually significant . I think people should be replicating some of the not-so-pleasant viral email campaigns that were used against [Obama]. Sarah Palins Scary Christianity | NewsReal Blog
Isn't that what makes you running-dog lackeys of your socialist masters get that tingle up your leg?
Admit it wingy.....never an original thought in your head, simply mouth the quotations from the ersatz version of Mao's Little Red Book.
Look at all the neat stuff I found on the interweb professor! Can't I just claim it as my opinion?
Pretty flimsy,...
If it wasn't my opinion, why would I include it?
It's pretty clear that you have no recourse but this same babble over and over, as every single thing I have posted about you Leftists and the subscription to socialism of the officials that you support, is
.....true.
And, that is reason for my linking and sourcing of material.
That, in fact, is the reason for your fabricated complaint about form.
Had you any rebuttal, you would use same for the substance.
It is with great appreciation that your juvenile repetition allows me such unimpeded opportunity.
Do carry on.
Now...as I was saying about the Leftist media, it's desire is not to present it's ideas, but to shut down opposition ideas.
"Not satisfied to slant and censor their own stories and venues, the army of liberal journalists want the government to shut down alternative views: The very existence of Fox News, meanwhile, sends Journolisters into paroxysms of rage. When Howell Raines charged that the network had a conservative bias, the members of Journolist discussed whether the federal government should shut the channel down.
I am genuinely scared of Fox, wrote Guardian columnist Daniel Davies, because it shows you that a genuinely shameless and unethical media organisation *cannot* be controlled by any form of peer pressure or self-regulation, and nor can it be successfully cold-shouldered or ostracised. In order to have even a semblance of control, you need a tough legal framework. Davies, a Brit, frequently argued the United States needed stricter libel laws.
I agree, said Michael Scherer of Time Magazine. Roger Ailes understands that his job is to build a tribal identity, not a news organization. You cant hurt Fox by saying it gets it wrong, if Ailes just uses the criticism to deepen the tribal identity.
Jonathan Zasloff, a law professor at UCLA, suggested that the federal government simply yank Fox off the air. I hate to open this can of worms, he wrote, but is there any reason why the FCC couldnt simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires? Liberal journalists suggest government censor Fox News | The Daily Caller)
Such is the disreputable, anti-American view of the Left-wing media.
And, no doubt, you agree with it.
