Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,939
- 60,622
- 2,645
Wow man, that's deep. I wonder if lifelong scientists thought of that?The sun comes up... It gets warm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow man, that's deep. I wonder if lifelong scientists thought of that?The sun comes up... It gets warm.
The problem of scale, of course. Come on man,you could have puzzled that out yourself.I see very little difference actually. Intentional pollution versus unintentional. Let's say the climate scientists are right.... What makes you think they can't weaponize their knowledge?Correct. Just not by contrails. Didn't think I had to spell that one out....we got us a real "meeting of the minds", here....Yet you insist that the climate has been manipulated.
Jo
You have not a shred of evidence and you are nuts.Plenty of documentation and patents proves my contentions are correct.
Wow man, that's deep. I wonder if lifelong scientists thought of that?The sun comes up... It gets warm.
Why are you asking me? Ask a climate scientist.
You mean those ones that are bought and paid for, to keep, or enhance their funding? The ones we the taxpayers pay to LIE to us through government funding?
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
The single greatest accomplishment of the AGW alarmists has been convince people in places like PITTSBURGH (where I live) that there is something harmful about warmer weather.
It is astounding.
Bring it on. The warmer the better.
Not all of the expected effects are negative.
Personally I hate polar bears.... But that's just me.
Jo
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
Not all of the expected effects are negative.
Personally I hate polar bears.... But that's just me.
Jo
Well that Polar Bears are doing just fine, and actually thriving, unfortunately for you.
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
Not at all. No rational person would say such a thing. The effects t of our emissions on the climate is what it is. Naming the percentage of one thing doesn't change that. What an odd thing to say.Oh and that kinda puts your scale problem in reverse..
Sorry dale, the conspiracy theory section is down there ↓And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
Like paying indulgences to a church so you can sin.. Still going to hell but you get to feel good going there..
Sorry dale, the conspiracy theory section is down there ↓And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
Like paying indulgences to a church so you can sin.. Still going to hell but you get to feel good going there..
Not at all. No rational person would say such a thing. The effects t of our emissions on the climate is what it is. Naming the percentage of one thing doesn't change that. What an odd thing to say.Oh and that kinda puts your scale problem in reverse..
Sorry dale, the conspiracy theory section is down there ↓And yet represent the emissions 9f the entire planet. So it looks like you do, indeed, still have a scale problem.Dunno about that....scale says that anthropogenic co and co2 are less than
1percent of the total effect...
What climate change cultists have never explained is how would paying a carbon tax paid to the banking oligarchs that own oil production and have suppressed fuel-efficient technology is going to "cool the planet".....
Better go grab some more talking points from the cultists because you are getting your ass handed to you.