Real Racism!

[22lcidw]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

 

[22lcidw]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

Ann Coulter is a white female. They are the ones who have benefited the most from affirmative action.

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It? | HuffPost

News Flash: Affirmative Action Most Benefits White Women

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Affirmative Action Has Mostly Helped Whites, but Trump Administration Says Not Enough

White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -

Now be quiet and crawl back under the bridge.

Now picture say only 100 good paying jobs but 150 people looking for them. And forced quotas no matter how good or not so good the applicant is, is the law of the land. This is the problem we face. We can not satisfy everyone. And there are people who may be better but are denied. So who do you satisfy and how low do you go to hire? Which direction do you go to satisfy? Should we have promoted that minority males should have been made the top priority to be given the opportunities for education and advancement in our nation decades ago when affirmative action and quotas began? If so we may have a stronger family system in our nation with lower taxes. However white women would not have had as much as they have now. Many of them are now living pointless lives with no mates. There are many women who make the most out of it though in balancing marriage and work which is more needed in a high tax society.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

 

[jillian]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

You should really see someone. Perhaps they can do something about you being a compulsive liar

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

Ann Coulter is a white female. They are the ones who have benefited the most from affirmative action.

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It? | HuffPost

News Flash: Affirmative Action Most Benefits White Women

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Affirmative Action Has Mostly Helped Whites, but Trump Administration Says Not Enough

White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -

Now be quiet and crawl back under the bridge.

Now picture say only 100 good paying jobs but 150 people looking for them. And forced quotas no matter how good or not so good the applicant is, is the law of the land. This is the problem we face. We can not satisfy everyone. And there are people who may be better but are denied. So who do you satisfy and how low do you go to hire? Which direction do you go to satisfy? Should we have promoted that minority males should have been made the top priority to be given the opportunities for education and advancement in our nation decades ago when affirmative action and quotas began? If so we may have a stronger family system in our nation with lower taxes. However white women would not have had as much as they have now. Many of them are now living pointless lives with no mates. There are many women who make the most out of it though in balancing marriage and work which is more needed in a high tax society.

So you hate women as well as blacks.........................

 

[PoliticalChic]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

You should really see someone. Perhaps they can do something about you being a compulsive liar

Miss?

You forgot to indicate any 'lies.'




Are you still a member of the anti-Semite party?


No self-respecting Jewish person can turn a blind eye to the hatred and vile associations uncovered at the heart of the Democrat Party.


1. Remember this:

Why Won't Donald Trump Repudiate the Ku Klux Klan? - The Atlantic
Why Won't Donald Trump Repudiate the Ku Klux Klan?

Clarion calls from the media, the Democrats……or is that redundant?......demanding Trump spew venom about the KKK......

....amusing, huh? As the KKK was a Democrat creation.




2. Now, we find this:

“Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite

• At least seven House Democrats are known to have direct ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
• Farrakhan is a notorious anti-Semite and racist
• A photo shows Barack Obama smiling with Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in 2005

…Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite and racist who has called Jews “satanic” and said white people “deserve to die.”

California Reps. Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee, Illinois Rep. Danny Davis, Indiana Rep. Andre Carson, Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, New York Rep. Gregory Meeks and Texas Rep. Al Green have all attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos, videos and witness accounts of the meetings reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Ellison, the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), repeatedly attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos and videos reviewed by TheDCNF and Farrakhan’s own statements.

Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite [VIDEO]






If one is a Democrat and claims to subscribe to Judaism......something is wrong.



Democrats: if not for double standards, they'd have no standards at all.
Jews and Democrats….Oil and Water





Or.....to put it another way, are you still lying to yourself?

 

[Correll]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

Agree completely. I just want to stop current anti-white discrimination. I have no desire to punish anyone for it, going forward.

 

[Correll]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

BTW, I voted for that, and plan to vote for more of it. You voted against it, fought it ever step of the way, and play to vote against it again.


So, who is helping blacks, you or me?

 

[anynameyouwish]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

sure

that is clear.

but other VERY CLEAR things you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights.

I'm sorry to be the one millionth person to tell you this but your lunacies quite often contradict themselves.

I mean.....as an example......you say "FREE SPEECH"
but then you turn around and advocate "we must SILENCE LIBERALS!"


see the contradiction there?

no?

that's because you are deranged.

 

[Correll]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

sure

that is clear.

but other VERY CLEAR things you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights.

I'm sorry to be the one millionth person to tell you this but your lunacies quite often contradict themselves.

I mean.....as an example......you say "FREE SPEECH"
but then you turn around and advocate "we must SILENCE LIBERALS!"


see the contradiction there?

no?

that's because you are deranged.

Saying that "America is a Christian nation" in no way states that "Christians are a protected species and non-Christians have no rights".

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

sure

that is clear.

but other VERY CLEAR things you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights.

I'm sorry to be the one millionth person to tell you this but your lunacies quite often contradict themselves.

I mean.....as an example......you say "FREE SPEECH"
but then you turn around and advocate "we must SILENCE LIBERALS!"


see the contradiction there?

no?

that's because you are deranged.

Saying that "America is a Christian nation" in no way states that "Christians are a protected species and non-Christians have no rights".

It really does. Otherwise it is not worth mentioning.

 

[22lcidw]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

Ann Coulter is a white female. They are the ones who have benefited the most from affirmative action.

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It? | HuffPost

News Flash: Affirmative Action Most Benefits White Women

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Affirmative Action Has Mostly Helped Whites, but Trump Administration Says Not Enough

White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -

Now be quiet and crawl back under the bridge.

Now picture say only 100 good paying jobs but 150 people looking for them. And forced quotas no matter how good or not so good the applicant is, is the law of the land. This is the problem we face. We can not satisfy everyone. And there are people who may be better but are denied. So who do you satisfy and how low do you go to hire? Which direction do you go to satisfy? Should we have promoted that minority males should have been made the top priority to be given the opportunities for education and advancement in our nation decades ago when affirmative action and quotas began? If so we may have a stronger family system in our nation with lower taxes. However white women would not have had as much as they have now. Many of them are now living pointless lives with no mates. There are many women who make the most out of it though in balancing marriage and work which is more needed in a high tax society.

So you hate women as well as blacks.........................

A Prog is a Prog of course of course...….I stated there are so many good jobs. Higher paying ones. We have quotas to dole most of them out. We have made people into criminals also . We have impoverished more white males to do it. Do you notice the criminal code keeps expanding even though in Prog areas there is a revolt against law enforcement. So in our quota world we do not necessarily hire the best. We hire the percentages. The taxes have mushroomed while the costs of government departments has also. The private side under these laws and rules can not keep up with the Asian competition for mastery of the world. Asia in a general sense still need us for they still have poorer areas and not enough middle class to be self sustaining. But that is winnowing every year. Your fat diseased azz will find out what not being number one means in a few decades.

 

[Correll]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

sure

that is clear.

but other VERY CLEAR things you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights.

I'm sorry to be the one millionth person to tell you this but your lunacies quite often contradict themselves.

I mean.....as an example......you say "FREE SPEECH"
but then you turn around and advocate "we must SILENCE LIBERALS!"


see the contradiction there?

no?

that's because you are deranged.

Saying that "America is a Christian nation" in no way states that "Christians are a protected species and non-Christians have no rights".

It really does. Otherwise it is not worth mentioning.

It really does not.

Your claim that "otherwise is it not worth mentioning" is unsupported. Completely.


You have done NOTHING to support your conclusion, other than assert it.


NOTHING.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

BTW, I voted for that, and plan to vote for more of it. You voted against it, fought it ever step of the way, and play to vote against it again.


So, who is helping blacks, you or me?

You mis-directed your post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

sure

that is clear.

but other VERY CLEAR things you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights.

I'm sorry to be the one millionth person to tell you this but your lunacies quite often contradict themselves.

I mean.....as an example......you say "FREE SPEECH"
but then you turn around and advocate "we must SILENCE LIBERALS!"


see the contradiction there?

no?

that's because you are deranged.

"...you have said "the USA IS a CHRISTIAN NATION" which obviously means you believe christians are a protected species and non-christians have no rights."

Can you quote what I said, mud?


And if you can't.....can we agree that you are both deranged, and a compulsive liar?

 

[Frannie]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

Look dude kimbala Harris wanted to give every black person a house which and I do not care if you dont like the truth would have resulted in the highest number of crack houses ever.

There are too many black billionaires for your theory to hold water

 

[Frannie]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

Agree completely. I just want to stop current anti-white discrimination. I have no desire to punish anyone for it, going forward.

We all need to stop thinking in color and begin observing peoples character

 

[Frannie]

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

BTW, I voted for that, and plan to vote for more of it. You voted against it, fought it ever step of the way, and play to vote against it again.


So, who is helping blacks, you or me?

You mis-directed your post.

If you believe that you determine direction you are as I said severely delusional

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Looks like a lot of black Americans recognize what Trump has done.....


New Polls: Black American support for President Trump:

Rasmussen: 34.5%

Emerson: 34%

Marist: 33%
Three new polls: Trump's approval rating among black voters has quadrupled

— Patricia Dickson (@Patrici15767099) December 2, 2019