Real Racism!

[PoliticalChic]

More Democrat racism.....and again, directed at white folks.


"Bloomberg Attacked for His Race: ‘Another Old, White Gentleman. Isn’t It Time for a Change?’
Questions put to the 2020 Democrat primary candidate during a television interview left many people stunned"
Bloomberg Attacked for His Race: 'Another Old, White Gentleman. Isn't It Time for a Change?'



Indisputable.....so, what to say about any white person who votes Democrat?


"Self-hating"???

 

[IM2]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.


1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.

…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.

With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.



4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.


5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else. Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

 

[IM2]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Looks like a lot of black Americans recognize what Trump has done.....


New Polls: Black American support for President Trump:

Rasmussen: 34.5%

Emerson: 34%

Marist: 33%
Three new polls: Trump's approval rating among black voters has quadrupled

— Patricia Dickson (@Patrici15767099) December 2, 2019

Once again you're wrong.

Gallup shows a much different picture and Gallup is the most credible poll.

According to Gallup, it's 10 percent.

Donald J. Trump

Job Approval among Blacks

10% on day 1014 in office

Presidential Job Approval Center

 

[IM2]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Nah. Get trumps balls out of your mouth.

 

[IM2]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

Ann Coulter is a white female. They are the ones who have benefited the most from affirmative action.

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It? | HuffPost

News Flash: Affirmative Action Most Benefits White Women

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Affirmative Action Has Mostly Helped Whites, but Trump Administration Says Not Enough

White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -

Now be quiet and crawl back under the bridge.

Now picture say only 100 good paying jobs but 150 people looking for them. And forced quotas no matter how good or not so good the applicant is, is the law of the land. This is the problem we face. We can not satisfy everyone. And there are people who may be better but are denied. So who do you satisfy and how low do you go to hire? Which direction do you go to satisfy? Should we have promoted that minority males should have been made the top priority to be given the opportunities for education and advancement in our nation decades ago when affirmative action and quotas began? If so we may have a stronger family system in our nation with lower taxes. However white women would not have had as much as they have now. Many of them are now living pointless lives with no mates. There are many women who make the most out of it though in balancing marriage and work which is more needed in a high tax society.

Look, I am not hearing any bullshit from whites who up until 54 years ago were not hiring people of color or women. What white men have done is the problem we face. It is time white men took that personal responsibility they preach to everyone else.

 

[bluzman61]

Coulter's newest article points out that, far too often, not only is the truth the very opposite of what the Left claims it to be.....but it is right there, staring us in the face.



1. “…race discrimination against whites is de rigueur. Forget being embarrassed, this is race discrimination with attitude. And it’s all justified by the nonsensical phrase: “white privilege.”


2.The lie of “white privilege” is treated as an implacable fact throughout our cultural institutions, no matter how manifestly absurd it is. Thus, in the discredited book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly act as if a half-Puerto Rican girl entering Yale in the 1980s deserves a place in the civil rights pantheon along with the Little Rock Nine.

If Ramirez had applied to Yale Law School after college, she would have had a five times better chance of being admitted than a white applicant like Kavanaugh -- simply because she had one Puerto Rican parent.


…the only group discriminated against in college admissions is white people.


With the same grades and scores, Puerto Ricans were 5.3 times more likely to be admitted to a top-tier law school like Yale than a white applicant. Every ethnic group except whites got a boost -- African Americans, Asians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and “Other Hispanic.” The more prestigious the law school, the stronger the preferences.



3. Asians are SO lucky they’re not white! Otherwise, America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be churning out reports on the worrying rise in Asian Supremacy.




4. In fact, however, a recent study by Georgetown University (probably White Nationalist), funded by the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation (presumed hate group), found that if colleges admitted students based solely on SAT scores, every single ethnic group would decline, except one: whites.

Yes, even fewer Asian students would be admitted on an SAT-only admission standard.




5. Affirmative action is supposed to be for the descendants of American slaves. See? We owe them something. Nobody else.
Without the legacy of slavery, affirmative action is just institutionalized anti-white racism.”
Are Facts White Nationalist?




College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America.

Ann Coulter is a white female. They are the ones who have benefited the most from affirmative action.

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone | TIME.com

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It? | HuffPost

News Flash: Affirmative Action Most Benefits White Women

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Affirmative Action Has Mostly Helped Whites, but Trump Administration Says Not Enough

White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents -

Now be quiet and crawl back under the bridge.

Now picture say only 100 good paying jobs but 150 people looking for them. And forced quotas no matter how good or not so good the applicant is, is the law of the land. This is the problem we face. We can not satisfy everyone. And there are people who may be better but are denied. So who do you satisfy and how low do you go to hire? Which direction do you go to satisfy? Should we have promoted that minority males should have been made the top priority to be given the opportunities for education and advancement in our nation decades ago when affirmative action and quotas began? If so we may have a stronger family system in our nation with lower taxes. However white women would not have had as much as they have now. Many of them are now living pointless lives with no mates. There are many women who make the most out of it though in balancing marriage and work which is more needed in a high tax society.

Look, I am not hearing any bullshit from whites who up until 54 years ago were not hiring people of color or women. What white men have done is the problem we face. It is time white men took that personal responsibility they preach to everyone else.

IM2, you need a new hobby. You rail against whites constantly. You need to realize that YOU'RE the problem, not THEM. Some whites ARE racist, but many MORE are good, decent people that are TOTALLY colorblind.

 

[Frannie]

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Looks like a lot of black Americans recognize what Trump has done.....


New Polls: Black American support for President Trump:

Rasmussen: 34.5%

Emerson: 34%

Marist: 33%
Three new polls: Trump's approval rating among black voters has quadrupled

— Patricia Dickson (@Patrici15767099) December 2, 2019

Once again you're wrong.

Gallup shows a much different picture and Gallup is the most credible poll.

View attachment 293858

According to Gallup, it's 10 percent.

Donald J. Trump

Job Approval among Blacks

10% on day 1014 in office

Presidential Job Approval Center

Dude turn your brain on, according to EVERY poll in 2016, Hillary Clinton could not lose.

Shove your fake poll where the sun doesn't shine

You and Obama love that

 

[Frannie]

I have never been discriminated against either. Where are all these white victims ?

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Nah. Get trumps balls out of your mouth.

That is not a nice way to speak about Alveda King MLK's niece

You are ignorant, Alveda is brilliant, go ahead put her down trashboy

 

[Frannie]

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

does this apply to non-christians as well?

if an ATHEIST or MUSLIM or (god forbid) a LIBERAL was the best applicant/candidate which conservative christian would you select instead?

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

 

[anynameyouwish]

This isn't clear enough, mud????

"College admission based on merit, rather than race, is to the benefit of America."

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Frannie]

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

If you say so

 

[bluzman61]

The effects of discrimination have been well documented. It is hard to believe you are ignorant of this.


Far more likely, you are willing to lie, because you support racist discrimination.

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Nah. Get trumps balls out of your mouth.

That is not a nice way to speak about Alveda King MLK's niece

You are ignorant, Alveda is brilliant, go ahead put her down trashboy

He speaks poorly of her, of course, because she's a proud supporter of President Trump. I believe MLK would be very proud of HER. She's colorblind, unlike IM2.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It would have been if that's the way it was from the beginning.

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

No, you dunce.....he means this:



"At least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle; recent estimates put the total closer to 750,000, or more than 2 percent of the nation’s population at that time. More soldiers died in prison camps alone than America lost during the entire Vietnam War. Perhaps more to the point, some 350,000 Union soldiers died during the conflict, abolitionists in effect if not always in intent. Adjusted for population, that would amount to almost 5 million service deaths today, amounting to a blood sacrifice more than sufficient to redeem whatever moral or intellectual inconsistencies there are to be found in America’s founding documents.

And if that’s not sufficient? Well, then, nothing will be. But for most Americans—and for much of the rest of the world—it is more than enough. "
Blood Redemption

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Every time, it's a hoax, a lie, as scam by Leftists..

Every time.


You might like to see numerous examples in this thread.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[IM2]

I would rather legitimately be given a lot of money for the crap taken. It would most likely quiet me down and bring some trust in the system we live in.

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

No, you dunce.....he means this:



"At least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle; recent estimates put the total closer to 750,000, or more than 2 percent of the nation’s population at that time. More soldiers died in prison camps alone than America lost during the entire Vietnam War. Perhaps more to the point, some 350,000 Union soldiers died during the conflict, abolitionists in effect if not always in intent. Adjusted for population, that would amount to almost 5 million service deaths today, amounting to a blood sacrifice more than sufficient to redeem whatever moral or intellectual inconsistencies there are to be found in America’s founding documents.

And if that’s not sufficient? Well, then, nothing will be. But for most Americans—and for much of the rest of the world—it is more than enough. "
Blood Redemption

More than 10 times this number of blacks died fighting slavery, apartheid in America and modern racism. The war was not fought to free blacks and the fact whites try telling us how to be grateful for fixing a problem they created is lunacy. So let me set your house on fire then demand that you owe me for calling the fire department.

 

[bluzman61]

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

No, you dunce.....he means this:



"At least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle; recent estimates put the total closer to 750,000, or more than 2 percent of the nation’s population at that time. More soldiers died in prison camps alone than America lost during the entire Vietnam War. Perhaps more to the point, some 350,000 Union soldiers died during the conflict, abolitionists in effect if not always in intent. Adjusted for population, that would amount to almost 5 million service deaths today, amounting to a blood sacrifice more than sufficient to redeem whatever moral or intellectual inconsistencies there are to be found in America’s founding documents.

And if that’s not sufficient? Well, then, nothing will be. But for most Americans—and for much of the rest of the world—it is more than enough. "
Blood Redemption

More than 10 times this number of blacks died fighting slavery, apartheid in America and modern racism. The war was not fought to free blacks and the fact whites try telling us how to be grateful for fixing a problem they created is lunacy. So let me set your house on fire then demand that you owe me for calling the fire department.

You NEED help, IM2. Please seek it.

 

[Frannie]

What????



It's been eight generations since the Republicans pried the Democrat's slaves away from 'em.

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

No, you dunce.....he means this:



"At least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle; recent estimates put the total closer to 750,000, or more than 2 percent of the nation’s population at that time. More soldiers died in prison camps alone than America lost during the entire Vietnam War. Perhaps more to the point, some 350,000 Union soldiers died during the conflict, abolitionists in effect if not always in intent. Adjusted for population, that would amount to almost 5 million service deaths today, amounting to a blood sacrifice more than sufficient to redeem whatever moral or intellectual inconsistencies there are to be found in America’s founding documents.

And if that’s not sufficient? Well, then, nothing will be. But for most Americans—and for much of the rest of the world—it is more than enough. "
Blood Redemption

More than 10 times this number of blacks died fighting slavery, apartheid in America and modern racism. The war was not fought to free blacks and the fact whites try telling us how to be grateful for fixing a problem they created is lunacy. So let me set your house on fire then demand that you owe me for calling the fire department.

The civil war was fought because the South intended to secede and keep people like you slaves.

But you will create your own reality that suits your racist beliefs

 

[IM2]

The question is should I pay for discrimination in the past that I was not responsible for. Should you?

Answer no, because all you do by this is create more discrimination

No, the question is should you continue to benefit from that past discrimination while maintaining the advantages created while still practicing the same discrimination?

Finally there is no discrimination against whites. If quotas existed whites would get 70 percent of every available opportunity. That's not discrimination, unless you believe you are entitled to everything.

"Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low"
Historic U.S. Job Market Continues as African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Low | The White House




Now...don't forget to send Trump a thank you card.....and a Christmas one, too.

Nah. Get trumps balls out of your mouth.

That is not a nice way to speak about Alveda King MLK's niece

You are ignorant, Alveda is brilliant, go ahead put her down trashboy

He speaks poorly of her, of course, because she's a proud supporter of President Trump. I believe MLK would be very proud of HER. She's colorblind, unlike IM2.

Since Alveda was the daughter of Kings brother, I pay more attention to what his actual children say.

The vision preached by my father a half-century ago was that his four little children would no longer live in a nation where they would judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. However, sadly, the tears of Trayvon Martin's mother and father remind us that, far too frequently, the color of one's skin remains a license to profile, to arrest and to even murder with no regard for the content of one's character.
Martin Luther King III

It's best for you to keep Kings name out your mouth.

 

[IM2]

What about the 100 years of bi partisan apartheid after slavery?

What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this

"What about the white man who ended slavery and was killed by a democrat for this""


do you mean the white liberal RINO who opposed and ended conservative christian slavery and was killed by a conservative christian democrat?

No, you dunce.....he means this:



"At least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle; recent estimates put the total closer to 750,000, or more than 2 percent of the nation’s population at that time. More soldiers died in prison camps alone than America lost during the entire Vietnam War. Perhaps more to the point, some 350,000 Union soldiers died during the conflict, abolitionists in effect if not always in intent. Adjusted for population, that would amount to almost 5 million service deaths today, amounting to a blood sacrifice more than sufficient to redeem whatever moral or intellectual inconsistencies there are to be found in America’s founding documents.

And if that’s not sufficient? Well, then, nothing will be. But for most Americans—and for much of the rest of the world—it is more than enough. "
Blood Redemption

More than 10 times this number of blacks died fighting slavery, apartheid in America and modern racism. The war was not fought to free blacks and the fact whites try telling us how to be grateful for fixing a problem they created is lunacy. So let me set your house on fire then demand that you owe me for calling the fire department.

The civil war was fought because the South intended to secede and keep people like you slaves.

But you will create your own reality that suits your racist beliefs

No, that's not why the war was fought and it's not about anything I made up. The whites in the north didn't give a damn about ending slavery and neither did Lincoln. Plus you can drop the racist meme about how whites sacrificed because whites created the problem.