Rand: I'm Looking Into Military Takeover

UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.


And when you write in really big text, do you feel more important, little contomu?
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Yes. It's alot like little 3 years old who cover their eyes and then tell you that YOU can't see them.

Neenerneenerneener...


MR FUCKTARD


QUESTION #1


WHY IS THE KGB-esque operation necessary?



.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

One of the areas where they were not very bright

They also supported slavery and opposed equal rights for women
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.


And when you write in really big text, do you feel more important, little contomu?


ISN'T IT A FACT THAT IF A WACO STYLED TRAGEDY OCCURS YOU WILL BLAME THE CITIZENS AND WILL HOLD THOSE WHO FEED YOU, CLOTHE YOU, INSURE YOU < QUENCH YOUR THIRST AS NOT GUILTY.


.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Yes. It's alot like little 3 years old who cover their eyes and then tell you that YOU can't see them.

Neenerneenerneener...


MR FUCKTARD


QUESTION #1


WHY IS THE KGB-esque operation necessary?



.


It's a shame you can't get a font bigger than 7, what??
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

One of the areas where they were not very bright

They also supported slavery and opposed equal rights for women


WHY ARE STANDING ARMIES NECESSARY?



.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.


And when you write in really big text, do you feel more important, little contomu?


ISN'T IT A FACT THAT IF A WACO STYLED TRAGEDY OCCURS YOU WILL BLAME THE CITIZENS AND WILL HOLD THOSE WHO FEED YOU, CLOTHE YOU, INSURE YOU < QUENCH YOUR THIRST AS NOT GUILTY.


.


Uhm, no.

Query: do you see black helicopters in your dreams? I mean, the dreams that aren't, you know, wet and sticky...
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Yes. It's alot like little 3 years old who cover their eyes and then tell you that YOU can't see them.

Neenerneenerneener...


MR FUCKTARD


QUESTION #1


WHY IS THE KGB-esque operation necessary?



.


It's a shame you can't get a font bigger than 7, what??


YES, IT IS.

A FONT BIGGER THAN 7 IS REQUIRED TO PENETRATE YOUR THICK SKULL.



.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.


And when you write in really big text, do you feel more important, little contomu?


ISN'T IT A FACT THAT IF A WACO STYLED TRAGEDY OCCURS YOU WILL BLAME THE CITIZENS AND WILL HOLD THOSE WHO FEED YOU, CLOTHE YOU, INSURE YOU < QUENCH YOUR THIRST AS NOT GUILTY.


.

Waco was caused by a cop killing pedophile who killed his own people
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

One of the areas where they were not very bright

They also supported slavery and opposed equal rights for women


WHY ARE STANDING ARMIES NECESSARY?



.

Because we are a modern society who is deeply entrenched in global affairs

Those militias just din't cut it. Even in the Revolutionary War, militias sucked
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.


And when you write in really big text, do you feel more important, little contomu?


ISN'T IT A FACT THAT IF A WACO STYLED TRAGEDY OCCURS YOU WILL BLAME THE CITIZENS AND WILL HOLD THOSE WHO FEED YOU, CLOTHE YOU, INSURE YOU < QUENCH YOUR THIRST AS NOT GUILTY.


.


Uhm, no.

Query: do you see black helicopters in your dreams? I mean, the dreams that aren't, you know, wet and sticky...


NO, NOT YET.


BUT THE UNFORTUNATE RESIDENTS OF MOUNT CARMEL WERE FIRED UPON FROM HELICOPTERS WHILE THE GESTAPO WAS SERVING AN INVISIBLE "PEACEFUL" SUMMONS
.

.

.
 
One of Con's links quoted Eisenhower's well known warning about the Military-Industrial Complex.

Ike's warning is a viable one, but the tards run too far with it.

After all, Eisenhower wouldn't have been a general if he had not been in the standing army prior to WWII. He was a major for 16 years.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

You understand you are not going to get a response from them, correct? They are not interested in meaningful discussion.

I have to ask though – why is this statement even relevant. What if they did oppose standing armies? They wrote a constitution that directly allowed them to create one. Until that is rectified, the federal government has the ability to have a standing army in existence.
 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

One of the areas where they were not very bright

They also supported slavery and opposed equal rights for women


WHY ARE STANDING ARMIES NECESSARY?



.

Because we are a modern society who is deeply entrenched in global affairs

Those militias just din't cut it. Even in the Revolutionary War, militias sucked


BECAUSE WE ARE A MILITARY STATE WHO LOVES TO INTERVENE IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - WHILE PLACING OUR CITIZENS IN HARMS WAY.


.
 
You see this, class?

A claim is made ("Jade Helm is unconstitutional") and the claimant is saying it is true until disproven. This is a favorite tactic of retards who cannot prove their claims and so they attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic. In this case, the claimant is unable to prove Jade Helm is unconstitutional, and thus throws up a logical fallacy to cover his inability to do so.

This logical fallacy is appropriately called the Argument from Ignorance


Question #1

MR DINGLE BERRY

IS IT A HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE COLONISTS OPPOSED STANDING ARMIES?!?!?!?!!?


.



.

One of the areas where they were not very bright

They also supported slavery and opposed equal rights for women


WHY ARE STANDING ARMIES NECESSARY?



.

Because we are a modern society who is deeply entrenched in global affairs

Those militias just din't cut it. Even in the Revolutionary War, militias sucked


BECAUSE WE ARE A MILITARY STATE WHO LOVES TO INTERVENE IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - WHILE PLACING OUR CITIZENS IN HARMS WAY.


.


Why are you shouting?

Inside voice....inside voice
 

Forum List

Back
Top