Quote of the Day...

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by _dmp_, Apr 21, 2004.

  1. _dmp_
    Offline

    _dmp_ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7
     
  2. OCA
    Offline

    OCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,014
    Thanks Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Washington D.C.
    Ratings:
    +223
    That is absolutely true.
     
  3. NewGuy
    Online

    NewGuy Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I agree.

    Would Ghandi have been successful, though, if the catholic church were to promote it?

    They DID bring Hitler to power.
     
  4. _dmp_
    Offline

    _dmp_ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7


    :rolleyes:

    :-/

    :rolleyes:
     
  5. Isaac Brock
    Offline

    Isaac Brock Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,104
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +44
    Great quote! I've never thought of pacifism in that context before.
     
  6. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    Yes. It seems all liberals try to make peace with those who desire their unconditional death. You can go tell the others what you've learned!
     
  7. Zhukov
    Offline

    Zhukov VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Everywhere, simultaneously.
    Ratings:
    +301
    It could be reworded to state: "Pacifism can be pratical when the party in charge is fundamentally good."

    As it stated Ghandi's policy worked because the English are in most respects good people. King's policies brought about Civil Rights, because most American's are good people.

    Terrorists, dictators, and relgious and secular fanatics, tend to be evil.

    Therefore pacifism does not sway them. It encourages them.
     
  8. nycflasher
    Offline

    nycflasher Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,078
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    CT
    Ratings:
    +14
    Interesting.
    Cool quote,dmp, and informative comment, Zhukov.
    However, I imagine if King or Ghandi were alive today they would still be defendng Pacifism, hard to imagine how though in light of the situation in the Middle East.

    I don't imagine a Camel Boycott would have worked in Iraq or Afghanistan :D
    We all know what happened to protestors there.
     
  9. _dmp_
    Offline

    _dmp_ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7
    I'd bet they'd be smart enough to realize what works, and when...
     
  10. Isaac Brock
    Offline

    Isaac Brock Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,104
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +44
    The king perhaps would agree with you, but I doubt Ghandi would. Though I suppose it's all speculation anyways!
     

Share This Page