Question for the Open Border Fans

Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.

They stayed illegally.

Those who crossed without going through customs are undocumented AND illegal.
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

lol are you for a wall between the US and Canada?
Do we need one?
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

lol are you for a wall between the US and Canada?
Do we need one?

Is that a yes or a no? Are you bailing out on the condition YOU set to define someone who supports open borders?
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.
Been to 19 nations so far. Each one said if I'm not out by a certain time they will arrest me.
 
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

lol are you for a wall between the US and Canada?
Do we need one?

Is that a yes or a no? Are you bailing out on the condition YOU set to define someone who supports open borders?
When socialism destroys Canada I foresee the need for a wall there too. Right now they follow our laws.
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.

They stayed illegally.

Those who crossed without going through customs are undocumented AND illegal.

Okay, so 20 years from now, IF you finally get through all the red tape and legal issues to get the wall built,

you still get at least half the immigration anyway, probably more than that because the wall will funnel people into the alternative routes.

Then what?
 
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

lol are you for a wall between the US and Canada?
Do we need one?

Is that a yes or a no? Are you bailing out on the condition YOU set to define someone who supports open borders?
When socialism destroys Canada I foresee the need for a wall there too. Right now they follow our laws.

lol, so you're for open borders for white people.
 
Almost all open border fans claim to have a deep desire that everyone make a "fair wage". Right now that is +$15/hr.

What direction is that pressure on $15 when Pablo is willing to live with ten families in an apartment and is happy making $8/hr?

You really think employers are going to budget for pay increases to keep a work force?
A resident with legal status would have to be paid the legal wage.
 
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.

They stayed illegally.

Those who crossed without going through customs are undocumented AND illegal.

Okay, so 20 years from now, IF you finally get through all the red tape and legal issues to get the wall built,

you still get at least half the immigration anyway, probably more than that because the wall will funnel people into the alternative routes.

Then what?
Red tape? Legal issues?

Oh, you mean obstacles put up by open border Democrats
 
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

lol are you for a wall between the US and Canada?
Do we need one?

Is that a yes or a no? Are you bailing out on the condition YOU set to define someone who supports open borders?
When socialism destroys Canada I foresee the need for a wall there too. Right now they follow our laws.

Canadians melt over 55 degrees.
 
Almost all open border fans claim to have a deep desire that everyone make a "fair wage". Right now that is +$15/hr.

What direction is that pressure on $15 when Pablo is willing to live with ten families in an apartment and is happy making $8/hr?

You really think employers are going to budget for pay increases to keep a work force?
A resident with legal status would have to be paid the legal wage.
And the tens of millions of illegals?
 
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.

They stayed illegally.

Those who crossed without going through customs are undocumented AND illegal.

Okay, so 20 years from now, IF you finally get through all the red tape and legal issues to get the wall built,

you still get at least half the immigration anyway, probably more than that because the wall will funnel people into the alternative routes.

Then what?

The wall can go up quicker in the most easily transited places. Those alternate routes can be better tracked and monitored.

That with increased deportations will reduce the issue over time.

Rome wasn't built in a day.
 
The wall can go up quicker in the most easily transited places. Those alternate routes can be better tracked and monitored.

That with increased deportations will reduce the issue over time.

Rome wasn't built in a day.

There is no argument against closing the border or building a wall ... Unless they simply want to support more Illegal Immigration.

To what ends is of no concern of mine.
The best any of them come up with for an argument concerns the status of Illegal Immigrants already here.

.
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
Selective amnesia - Wikipedia
Selective Liberal amnesia is a type of amnesia in which the liberal victim loses certain parts of his/her memory.[citation needed] Common elements that may be forgotten: what is said before, relationships, special talents (e.g.: juggling, whistling, instrumental talents, etc.), where he/she lives, abilities in certain areas (e.g.: a new gymnast forgetting she cannot cartwheel yet), and events such as concerts, shows, or traumatic events (e.g.: a death/suicide of a loved one or attempt on one's own life).
 
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.

Half the so-called illegals here got in legally at the time they crossed the border, dumbass.

They stayed illegally.

Those who crossed without going through customs are undocumented AND illegal.

Okay, so 20 years from now, IF you finally get through all the red tape and legal issues to get the wall built,

you still get at least half the immigration anyway, probably more than that because the wall will funnel people into the alternative routes.

Then what?

The wall can go up quicker in the most easily transited places. Those alternate routes can be better tracked and monitored.

That with increased deportations will reduce the issue over time.

Rome wasn't built in a day.
That with increased deportations will reduce the issue over time.
Have the illegals build the wall for $8 an hour but when they finish the wall, they are on the south side of it.....:bang3:
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.
The costs, the environmental impact, the symbology, the diplomatic impact, these are the real concerns. Add to that the fact that a twenty five foot high wall can be scaled using a twenty six foot high ladder. Walls, be they in Berlin, China, Palestine or bordering Scotland and England do not work.
 
The solutions to these immigration problems are simple and obvious. Enforce the law. Period. Enforce the laws that criminalize employment of persons who are not in the country legally. Take away benefits. Work with Mexico and other originating countries to incentivize their returns. If we need a Billion low-paid workers, enhance our guest worker laws, but make sure that only the worker comes here, with their families remaining their own country. Tax the guest workers with the equivalent of SS, but keep the money in escrow for them, to be given back to them when they get back home.

There is no Leftist compassion for these illegals. It is all about votes, and the assumption that eventually we will have a Democrat President and Congress and all these illegal bastards will become voting citizens immediately thereafter. If you think the Republicans are "stealing" elections through gerrymandering, wait until the Dems have 30-40 million unfortunate Wetbacks lining up at the voting booths. It could happen if "we" are not diligent.

Does that make me a racist?
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.
The costs, the environmental impact, the symbology, the diplomatic impact, these are the real concerns. Add to that the fact that a twenty five foot high wall can be scaled using a twenty six foot high ladder. Walls, be they in Berlin, China, Palestine or bordering Scotland and England do not work.
Israel did it and it works great.

Damn your EIR bs.
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?
That's funny.
No, you're funny. Define 'open border fans' or have your premise rejected.

Here's an example of how you framed this thread: do you still beat your wife?
Anyone opposed to the wall is for open borders. A wall only allows people to be processed thru a system as they enter.

And don't even try to pretend you lefties care about costs.
The costs, the environmental impact, the symbology, the diplomatic impact, these are the real concerns. Add to that the fact that a twenty five foot high wall can be scaled using a twenty six foot high ladder. Walls, be they in Berlin, China, Palestine or bordering Scotland and England do not work.

Completely wrong. All those walls made it more difficult for people to cross. It added to the work they had to do to get around them or break through them, or go under them.

The Berlin wall wasn't designed to stop every single person, it was designed to reduce the amount of people getting to West Berlin to a trickle, and it succeeded.

All of the military walls you quoted had the purpose of making it impossible for smaller groups to raid pass the wall, and to force and invader to lay seige to the wall to get through it.
 
Who are these 'open border' people you guys keep ranting about?

StrawMan2.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top