Question For Liberals #9

[JoeB131]

Gipper, did I call it?

This place is too easy.

Yup, when people blow big holes in your false premises, they prove your point that your premise is false.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Bro, we don't even listen to all your labels anymore. It's like white noise at this point.

Bro, it's hard to take you guys seriously, when you put up guys like Dawkins as authorities.

Here's the skinny on Mac's Hero.

Richard Dawkins has lost it: ignorant sexism gives atheists a bad name | Adam Lee

Then another prominent male atheist, Sam Harris, crammed his foot in his mouth and said that atheist activism lacks an “estrogen vibe” and was “to some degree intrinsically male”. And, just like that, the brief Dawkins Spring was over.
On Twitter these last few days, Dawkins has reverted to his old, sexist ways and then some. He’s been very busy snarling about how feminists are shrill harridans who just want an excuse to take offense, and how Harris’s critics (and his own) are not unlike thought police witch-hunter lynch mobs. Dawkins claimed that his critics are engaged in “clickbait for profit”, that they “fake outrage”, and that he wished there were some way to penalize them.
For good measure, Dawkins argued that rape victims shouldn’t be considered trustworthy if they were drinking.

Mac's hero.

White noise, bro.

 

[JoeB131]

Compared to nothing, dude. She's literally the most corrupt person in the world. Literally a sociopath.

Okay, guy, the problem with that is that Republicans have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to prove that over the last 25 years and have come up with exactly NOTHING.

Now, in my corner of the universe, if you are going to accuse someone of just about anything you can think of, you spend 100 million dollars investigating her, and the worst you can come up with is 'She used the wrong kind of email when there wasn't a clear rule on that, just like her two immediate predecessors did." I have to say, quite honestly, I'm less than impressed.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Compared to nothing, dude. She's literally the most corrupt person in the world. Literally a sociopath.

Okay, guy, the problem with that is that Republicans have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to prove that over the last 25 years and have come up with exactly NOTHING.

Now, in my corner of the universe, if you are going to accuse someone of just about anything you can think of, you spend 100 million dollars investigating her, and the worst you can come up with is 'She used the wrong kind of email when there wasn't a clear rule on that, just like her two immediate predecessors did." I have to say, quite honestly, I'm less than impressed.

Heard you make this claim before, that Hillary is clean.

I guess I wouldn't expect much from a guy who uses islamophobe and sexist in the same charge.

 

[gipper]

Cite ten of them.

Note that he can't even define regressive.

Look in the mirror and voila!!! There is a regressive.

See? You're as retarded as Mac, babbling on about something you don't even know the meaning of.

Gipper, watch this.

NYC, here's a few honest liberals laying it all out for you. You'll never have to wonder what the term means again. You'll never have to ask again.

Now, because you're honest and curious, I'm sure you'll gobble these up and truly understand the term.

You're welcome.

And by the way, I know this won't be good enough, but it will be fun to watch you deny it.

Ready, set, SPIN!

I'm not burning up bandwidth watching stupid videos. You can't state it in your own words, admit it.

Gipper, did I call it?

This place is too easy.
.

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

 

[gipper]

She is so bad, a majority of Americans voted for Trump over her.

Do you REALLY want to go there, Gip????

Truth is difficult for some to accept.

 

[Mac1958]

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

A day without triggering the Regressives is like a day without sunshine.

You'll note I never use anyone but liberals - REAL liberals - to explain my point about Regressives. That's what makes the Regressives so weepy. I provided a mountain of material from REAL liberals, the Regressives avoid it like the freakin' plague, and try to make it about me instead. Like clockwork.

My guess is that, at some level, they realize this. Maybe that knowledge is what makes them so hateful and dishonest.

Always fascinating, though, that's for sure.
.

 

[Rustic]

Hillary has blamed at least 38 factors besides herself for her loss. Liberals, do you buy this, or should Hillary take responsibility for her loss?

No, i think we as a country have no one to blame but ourselves for the disaster that is Donald Trump. We knew what the right thing was, we went ahead and did the wrong thing anyway.

I do like how you try to shift blame back onto Hillary, though.

Could she have done some things better? Yup. But at the end of the day, Americans saw a man who had no business being in the White House, and either decided to vote for him anyway, or piss away their vote on a third party nut.

Primarily trump was not a career politician, Hildabeast was the epitome of the career politician. Normal every day working people wanted nothing to do with her

 

[Rustic]

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

A day without triggering the Regressives is like a day without sunshine.

You'll note I never use anyone but liberals - REAL liberals - to explain my point about Regressives. That's what makes the Regressives so weepy. I provided a mountain of material from REAL liberals, the Regressives avoid it like the freakin' plague, and try to make it about me instead. Like clockwork.

My guess is that, at some level, they realize this. Maybe that knowledge is what makes them so hateful and dishonest.

Always fascinating, though, that's for sure.
.

I believe you are largely correct, One area are you are missing though is the deal with political correctness. Political correctness basically replaces free speech in the progressives world.

 

[Care4all]

Only the Right really gives a shit about Hillary Clinton anymore.

Are you saying you lefties have thrown Hillary's carcass to the side of the road?

I'm saying that you wankers on the Right are still obsessed with Hillary Clinton.

You couldn't even admit you threw her onto the ash heap of history. The butt hurt is still very strong with you.

And I see with your new Avatar you support kek, the God of chaos! An, if not the, antichrist!
Who would have guessed it?

 

[Mac1958]

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

A day without triggering the Regressives is like a day without sunshine.

You'll note I never use anyone but liberals - REAL liberals - to explain my point about Regressives. That's what makes the Regressives so weepy. I provided a mountain of material from REAL liberals, the Regressives avoid it like the freakin' plague, and try to make it about me instead. Like clockwork.

My guess is that, at some level, they realize this. Maybe that knowledge is what makes them so hateful and dishonest.

Always fascinating, though, that's for sure.
.

I believe you are largely correct, One area are you are missing though is the deal with political correctness. Political correctness basically replaces free speech in the progressives world.

Oh no, Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians, and are entirely responsible for creating, nurturing and pushing PC and Identity Politics.

That's a core part of being an illiberal authoritarian. A REAL liberal supports, expects, DEFENDS and DEMANDS true freedom of expression for all.
.

 

[Rustic]

And by the way, I know this won't be good enough, but it will be fun to watch you deny it.

Ready, set, SPIN!

SO misogynist and Islamophobe Richard Dawkins has a conversation with Racist and Islamophobe Bill Maher, and we are supposed to be impressed that they are "honest liberals". The only thing these guys are honest about is their bigotry.

Look, guy, I'm sorry that you didn't win the conversation on what liberalism should be. Just like I'm sorry that your boy didn't win his argument on what Islam should be. But sometimes you have to accept that you lost the argument.

Islam is not a race. Cup cake

The only people that call other people Islamophobs, think Islam is the race.

 

[Rustic]

Hillary was "the right thing."

Compared to the Game Show Host, um, yeah.

It's becoming more and more obvious that Trump has no idea how to run the country. I mean, you can try to milk the 'but Hillary was a bitch" card as long as you want, but pretty much, all you do is expose your own misogyny.

You spent too much time in your mothers basement watching MSNBC… LOL

 

[Mac1958]

And by the way, I know this won't be good enough, but it will be fun to watch you deny it.

Ready, set, SPIN!

SO misogynist and Islamophobe Richard Dawkins has a conversation with Racist and Islamophobe Bill Maher, and we are supposed to be impressed that they are "honest liberals". The only thing these guys are honest about is their bigotry.

Look, guy, I'm sorry that you didn't win the conversation on what liberalism should be. Just like I'm sorry that your boy didn't win his argument on what Islam should be. But sometimes you have to accept that you lost the argument.

Islam is not a race. Cup cake

The only people that call other people Islamophobs, think Islam is the race.

The Regressives are nuts.

Here's a couple of honest liberals who agree with you:

 

[bripat9643]

Only the Right really gives a shit about Hillary Clinton anymore.

We know you want that embarrassment to quietly go away.

 

[Rustic]

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

A day without triggering the Regressives is like a day without sunshine.

You'll note I never use anyone but liberals - REAL liberals - to explain my point about Regressives. That's what makes the Regressives so weepy. I provided a mountain of material from REAL liberals, the Regressives avoid it like the freakin' plague, and try to make it about me instead. Like clockwork.

My guess is that, at some level, they realize this. Maybe that knowledge is what makes them so hateful and dishonest.

Always fascinating, though, that's for sure.
.

I believe you are largely correct, One area are you are missing though is the deal with political correctness. Political correctness basically replaces free speech in the progressives world.

Oh no, Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians, and are entirely responsible for creating, nurturing and pushing PC and Identity Politics.

That's a core part of being an illiberal authoritarian. A REAL liberal supports, expects, DEFENDS and DEMANDS true freedom of expression for all.
.

I think there is probably a very large difference between a "liberal" and a "progressive"...
progressives seem to be very into being control freaks and intolerant to the extreme.
I go to shows all over the country and a few in Europe, I run into a lot of interesting people. Me being at Indian and a libertarian/conservative(Libertarian on the social side conservative on the fiscal side) gets very interesting reactions from people. The most racist people I encounter across the country are progressives…

 

[Mac1958]

Regressives are closed minded. It is one of their most prominent traits.

A day without triggering the Regressives is like a day without sunshine.

You'll note I never use anyone but liberals - REAL liberals - to explain my point about Regressives. That's what makes the Regressives so weepy. I provided a mountain of material from REAL liberals, the Regressives avoid it like the freakin' plague, and try to make it about me instead. Like clockwork.

My guess is that, at some level, they realize this. Maybe that knowledge is what makes them so hateful and dishonest.

Always fascinating, though, that's for sure.
.

I believe you are largely correct, One area are you are missing though is the deal with political correctness. Political correctness basically replaces free speech in the progressives world.

Oh no, Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians, and are entirely responsible for creating, nurturing and pushing PC and Identity Politics.

That's a core part of being an illiberal authoritarian. A REAL liberal supports, expects, DEFENDS and DEMANDS true freedom of expression for all.
.

I think there is probably a very large difference between a "liberal" and a "progressive"...
progressives seem to be very into being control freaks and intolerant to the extreme.
I go to shows all over the country and a few in Europe, I run into a lot of interesting people. Me being at Indian and a libertarian/conservative(Libertarian on the social side conservative on the fiscal side) gets very interesting reactions from people. The most racist people I encounter across the country are progressives…

Another term for "Regressive" would be "illiberal leftist authoritarian".

These. Are. Not. Liberals.
.

 

[Rustic]

Compared to nothing, dude. She's literally the most corrupt person in the world. Literally a sociopath.

Okay, guy, the problem with that is that Republicans have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to prove that over the last 25 years and have come up with exactly NOTHING.

Now, in my corner of the universe, if you are going to accuse someone of just about anything you can think of, you spend 100 million dollars investigating her, and the worst you can come up with is 'She used the wrong kind of email when there wasn't a clear rule on that, just like her two immediate predecessors did." I have to say, quite honestly, I'm less than impressed.

You're making excuses for the Hildabeast?
You see that is where you lose the argument every time… LOL

 

[gipper]

You are a regressive and prove it every day with your regressive posts.

Cite ten of them.

Note that he can't even define regressive.

Look in the mirror and voila!!! There is a regressive.

See? You're as retarded as Mac, babbling on about something you don't even know the meaning of.

Right back at you.

Be honest now....if you had the power, you would silence me. This is what makes you a regressive.

Really? I've taken that position when?

I asked you to be honest, but you failed to respond.

If you had the power, would you silence me and those like me?

 

[gipper]

Hillary has blamed at least 38 factors besides herself for her loss. Liberals, do you buy this, or should Hillary take responsibility for her loss?

No, i think we as a country have no one to blame but ourselves for the disaster that is Donald Trump. We knew what the right thing was, we went ahead and did the wrong thing anyway.

I do like how you try to shift blame back onto Hillary, though.

Could she have done some things better? Yup. But at the end of the day, Americans saw a man who had no business being in the White House, and either decided to vote for him anyway, or piss away their vote on a third party nut.

Trump is bad, but nowhere near as bad as your Messiah and the pantsuit. So, be happy