Question about immigration

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
52,549
50,745
3,605
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?

Hahaha, why not just ask or should have the Indians been more advanced? Liberalism truly is a mental disease. By the way, the first whites here weren't immigrants. They were colonizers and settlers.
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off? /---- Ask Mommy to get your Google fixed: One wave of migration from Siberia populated the Americas, DNA ...
News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's US edition | The Guardian › Science › Evolution
Jul 21, 2015 - One wave of migration from Siberia populated the Americas, DNA shows ... Guinea and the Andaman Islands than to present-day Native Americans ... and ice bridge which connected modern-day Russia and Alaska in Earth's ...
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?

Truth be told. Whites were first. Check out the Solutrians. The Solutrian skull has just been admitted to the Smithsonian. There was also a clovis stone leading anthropoligists to the determination that Solutrian man originated from what now is France. The area of Southern IN / KY / Ill ; commonly known in KKK klaverns as Solutria or Yahweh's Triangle.
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?

Hahaha, why not just ask or should have the Indians been more advanced? Liberalism truly is a mental disease. By the way, the first whites here weren't immigrants. They were colonizers and settlers.

What is the difference between an immigrant and a "colonizer" or "settler"?
 
What is the difference between an immigrant and a "colonizer" or "settler"?

immigrant: someone who comes to live in a country from another country

settler: someone who goes to live in a place where not many people live, and starts to make it into a community

colonizer: someone who forms a country that is controlled by another country
 
What is the difference between an immigrant and a "colonizer" or "settler"?

immigrant: someone who comes to live in a country from another country

settler: someone who goes to live in a place where not many people live, and starts to make it into a community

colonizer: someone who forms a country that is controlled by another country

Settlers come to live in a place where not many live? How many is not too many?
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?
A false dichotomy. The natives merely needed a market friendly visa program. Much better than casino revenue, now.

Nope, should have built a wall.
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?
A false dichotomy. The natives merely needed a market friendly visa program. Much better than casino revenue, now.

Nope, should have built a wall.
a wall cost time and effort. a market friendly visa generates revenue via capitalism and that, "invisible hand".
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?

Hahaha, why not just ask or should have the Indians been more advanced? Liberalism truly is a mental disease. By the way, the first whites here weren't immigrants. They were colonizers and settlers.



What is the difference between an immigrant and a "colonizer" or "settler"?
The Unsettling Truth About Race

The Indians were never settlers. They were campers.
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?
A false dichotomy. The natives merely needed a market friendly visa program. Much better than casino revenue, now.

Nope, should have built a wall.
Criminal Mongoloid Fugitives From Siberia

You might as well say that the other inferior animal species that were decimated and displaced should have gotten together and built a wall.
 
Should have all of the American Indians welcomed the white immigrants from Europe with open arms or should have all of them joined forces and fought them off?

The American Indians were too busy killing, torturing and enslaving each other to "join forces" against the Europeans. Besides, arrows are no defense against microbes.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top