Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

[Deplorable Yankee]

the fed pulled off raising interest rates
real estate is still flat

NYc real- estate is another animal and bucks national trends ..not saying it doesn't go soft
glad i sold out in 14 an and 2015

weakest manufacturing last quarter was coming out of the north east but it was showing absolutely no signs of heading for contraction

errrrr
anyone who wants to work can find a job
even in communities where rural farmers have more money than suburbanite braggert twats


trump jumping at great economic activity and claiming we can see four 5 6 percent gdp growth is a nothing burger
ive listened to warren buffet call picks and say what are you out of your mind

derp and been right

the economy has some weak spots but we're not dead

 

[McRocket]

What trade deals? NAFTA 2.0 is the only one's he's done. Canada was the big winner in that one. The US got nothing.

Um, Canada got screwed with the USMCA deal...

You just proved you do not have nary a clue what is actually in the deal.

'Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. There might not be a lot of love lost between Trump and Trudeau, but in the end, Trudeau didn’t cave much on his key issues: dairy and Chapter 19, the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism. Trudeau held out and got what he wanted: Canada’s dairy supply management system stays mostly intact, and Chapter 19 remains in place, a win for the Canadian lumber sector. On dairy, Canada is mainly giving U.S. farmers more ability to sell milk protein concentrate, skim milk powder and infant formula. On top of the substantive issues, Trump went out of his way to criticize the Canadian negotiating team in the final days of deliberations, which Trudeau can play up as a sign of just how hard his staff fought on this deal.'

Winners and losers of the ‘USMCA’ trade deal

PLUS, it looks like Canada will not even ratify it.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?


I suggest you stick to whatever the hell it is you do know.

Because USMCA AIN'T it.

Have a nice day.

Canadian Economy Halts – GDP Growth Drops to 0.1 Percent, and No-One Is Talking About Why…

Within the new USMCA the critically important NAFTA loophole was closed.

Over the past three decades both Canada and Mexico structured key parts of their independent trade agreements to take advantage of their unique access to the U.S. market. Under the existing NAFTA, Mexico and Canada generate billions in economic activity through exploiting the NAFTA loophole.

China, Asia (writ large), and the EU enter into trade agreements with Mexico and Canada as back-doors into the U.S. market. So long as corporations can avoid U.S. tariffs (and rules of origin that pertain to those tariffs), by going through Canada and Mexico they would continue to exploit this approach.

By shipping parts to Mexico and/or Canada; and by deploying satellite assembly facilities in Canada and/or Mexico; China, Asia and to a lesser extent EU corporations exploited a NAFTA loophole for rules of origin on finished goods.

Through a process of building, assembling or partially manufacturing their products in Mexico/Canada those foreign corporations could skirt U.S. trade tariffs and direct U.S. trade agreements. The finished foreign products entered the U.S. under NAFTA rules.

Why deal with the U.S. when you can just deal with Mexico, and use NAFTA rules to ship your product directly into the U.S. market?

This exploitative approach, a backdoor to the U.S. market, was the primary reason for massive foreign investment in Canada and Mexico; it was also the primary reason why candidate Donald Trump, now President Donald Trump, wanted to shut down that loophole and renegotiate NAFTA.

At the conclusion of Round #6, just before giving up on Chrystia Freeland for good, this was the direct issue at the heart of a very frustrated U.S.T.R. Lighthizer’s strongly worded response to Canada:

[…] In another proposal, Canada reserved the right to treat the United States and Mexico even worse than other countries if they enter into future agreements. Those other countries may, in fact, even include China, if there is an agreement between China and [Canada]. This proposal, I think if the United States had made it, would be dubbed a “poison pill.” We did not make it, though. Obviously, this is unacceptable to us, and my guess is it is to the Mexican side also. (read full remarks)

This loophole was the primary reason U.S. manufacturers relocated operations to Mexico. Corporations within the U.S. Auto-Sector could enhance profits by building in Mexico or Canada using cheap parts imported from Asia/China. The labor factor was not as big a part of the overall cost consideration as cheaper machined parts and imported raw materials.

If the U.S. applied the same tariffs to Canada and Mexico we apply to all trade nations, then the benefit of using Canada and Mexico -by those trade nations- is lost.

Corporations will no longer have any advantage, and many are likely to just deal directly with the U.S. This was the reason Trump, Lighthizer and Ross to retained Steel and Aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico until they agreed to the new USMCA rules.

When Trump took away the flawed NAFTA market access; and when Trump removed the ability of Mexico and Canada to broker themselves for economic benefit; there was no longer a financial benefit behind corporations investing in Canada. Under a binding trade pact between the USMCA partners, the NAFTA flaw is closed.

As a direct outcome billions of investment dollars are now being removed from any future consideration into Canada.

That’s the overarching reason for the Canadian GDP to halt.

Here’s the proverbial $64,000 question: Can Canada re-engineer their economy and actually begin to “make” products again, not just simply “assemble” foreign products from other nations?

• Can Canada reverse three-decades of specifically structured economic policy decisions that were centered around this “assembly” (brokered) economy?
• Can the environmentalists be put back into a box while heavy manufacturing and raw material development are reconstituted?
• Can the environmentalists allow natural resource development? Oil development, mining operations, lowered overall energy costs, etc?
• Can Canada somehow lower national energy costs so that Heavy manufacturing might consider restarting? (NOTE: heavy manufacturing requires massive energy use.)
• Can Canada find any industrial development investors who would be willing to take a chance on all the above?

See the problem?

The Canadian economy is not likely going to get better without a radical shift in Canadian political perspectives and outlook(s).

Then again, perhaps that’s really why Justin and Chrystia were so damned set on protecting their “cultural industries” (ie. media) from competition.

Think about it.

Canadian Economy Halts – GDP Growth Drops to 0.1 Percent, and No-One Is Talking About Why…

The Last Refuge is a joke of a site. They make FoxNews look like the Washington Post. Whatever they say means NOTHING to me.

'In review, The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) reports news with a strong right wing bias with all stories favoring the right and denigrating the left.'

'Overall, The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) far right biased and borderline questionable based on multiple failed fact checks. This source is one failed fact check from moving to the Questionable list.'

The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) - Media Bias/Fact Check


I suggest you get a source that is UNBIASED...because if this is where you get your 'facts' - you are learning NOTHING.

Have a nice day.

LOL, MBFC is a joke, curious as to how many sites they bumped as far left based just based on their screw up on reporting the Covington Catholic story? That story alone should have bumped several left wing bias outlets to the Questionable list.

LOL...lady, the fact that you a) read that con trash in the first place and then b) desperately try and knock anything that knocks it tells me ALL I need to know about your general knowledge.

My sources are Bloomberg and the Seattle Times. Yours is some con ding dong who types on a blog.

Guess which ones hold more weight with Wall Street?


You are some (I assume) Trumpbot gal who gets their news from some fickle, massively biased site. For goodness sake's lady - it's called the 'Conservative Treehouse'. You really are so naive as to think that makes it unbiased?

Whatever.


Show me a link to a RESPECTED, UNBIASED source who backs up your ridiculous statement above that 'Um, Canada got screwed with the USMCA deal...' (which, BTW, almost ALL of Wall Street disagrees with) and I might read it.

Until then, we are done here.

Good day.

 

[McRocket]

He will crush it if congress approves his trade deals

LOL...really?

Exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically ('crush') alter the Real GDP Growth?

This should be good for a laugh because I have read some of your posts and you appear COMPLETELY clueless about macroeconomic matters.

I just listen to EXPERTS . Are you a expert? My roommate graduated from Harvard,, economics major.. do you know more then him?

LOL...yeah, and I am the Postmaster General. Nice spin, pal.

I will ask again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?

If you don’t know the trade deals I’m talking about,, why would I waste my time with a low iq person?? Bro turn on your internet or tv lol you are information deprived

Typical troll...makes up shit to get attention. And when someone calls him on it - he spins around like a top because he knows he has got squat.

LOL.

Hey pal...you made the initial claim. It is up to you to back it up...not the rest of us to prove it is wrong.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


Either answer the question or at least be a man (if you are one) and admit you cannot.

 

[Jitss617]

He will crush it if congress approves his trade deals

LOL...really?

Exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically ('crush') alter the Real GDP Growth?

This should be good for a laugh because I have read some of your posts and you appear COMPLETELY clueless about macroeconomic matters.

I just listen to EXPERTS . Are you a expert? My roommate graduated from Harvard,, economics major.. do you know more then him?

LOL...yeah, and I am the Postmaster General. Nice spin, pal.

I will ask again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?

If you don’t know the trade deals I’m talking about,, why would I waste my time with a low iq person?? Bro turn on your internet or tv lol you are information deprived

Typical troll...makes up shit to get attention. And when someone calls him on it - he spins around like a top because he knows he has got squat.

LOL.

Hey pal...you made the initial claim. It is up to you to back it up...not the rest of us to prove it is wrong.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


Either answer the question or at least be a man (if you are one) and admit you cannot.

It’s every where look them up

 

[Faun]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8...

Yet poor sore loser butt-hurt, hate-driven, reality-denying snowflakes continue to whine, wail, lie, deny, justify, and attempt to minimize successes Obama NEVER accomplished while President.

BWUHAHAHAHAHA....

poor little snowflakes...

LOLOLOLOL

Unemployment under Obama went from Bush's recession high of 10% down to 4.7%. Under Trump, it's gone down to 3.8%

Obama: 5.3 point drop
Trump: 0.9 point drop
Rightard: "Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8"

 

[Wry Catcher]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

You fricken loons are, if nothing else, quite entertaining. You piss and moan month after month for the last couple of years, resisting everything and anything possible. Then you want to whine about GDP numbers not reaching a certain level. Why the hell don't ya try contributing for once in your stinkin life.

Given trump is spending like we are in a recession we need a lot more growth than we are getting. Deficits are huge.

Yep, so what the heck resist. If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem....I'm sure you've heard that before.

He's done everything republicans said would lead to great growth. So far it's just great deficits.

And liberals/democrats have done everything they could to hamper any growth.

How?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Blomberg is good . its a really great news organization , just put on yer filter for some issues like gun control and "man made " global warming
reading it forever along with the times ny and london ......before the internet BOTH easily available at the majority NYC news stands
WSJ
barons

blogs zero hedge is good

trade news from shipping to what i used to do for a living

the list is a quarter mile long .

 

[Jitss617]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8...

Yet poor sore loser butt-hurt, hate-driven, reality-denying snowflakes continue to whine, wail, lie, deny, justify, and attempt to minimize successes Obama NEVER accomplished while President.

BWUHAHAHAHAHA....

poor little snowflakes...

LOLOLOLOL

Unemployment under Obama went from Bush's recession high of 10% down to 4.7%. Under Trump, it's gone down to 3.8%

Obama: 5.3 point drop
Trump: 0.9 point drop
Rightard: "Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8"

When democrats took over congress that’s when it got real bad

 

[Faun]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8...

Yet poor sore loser butt-hurt, hate-driven, reality-denying snowflakes continue to whine, wail, lie, deny, justify, and attempt to minimize successes Obama NEVER accomplished while President.

BWUHAHAHAHAHA....

poor little snowflakes...

LOLOLOLOL

Unemployment under Obama went from Bush's recession high of 10% down to 4.7%. Under Trump, it's gone down to 3.8%

Obama: 5.3 point drop
Trump: 0.9 point drop
Rightard: "Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8"

When democrats took over congress that’s when it got real bad

So? Post the legislation you think they passed to cause it?

 

[Dragonlady]

He's done everything republicans said would lead to great growth. So far it's just great deficits.

And liberals/democrats have done everything they could to hamper any growth.

Which was about nothing the first two years. Repubs had full control. But it's funny you still try to blame dems. Partisans are so very dumb.

Listen, how about I break it down to a level you may understand. Let's say I was adding a room onto a house, I have a deadline. Every third day you call the city to come out because you question something being done. What happens to my deadline?

Repubs have done everything to the economy they claimed would make it great again. They did their big tax cuts. They have eliminated regulations. Nobody stood in their way for 2 years. And even with huge deficits we didn't hit 3%. Sad.

Why are so many Americans struggling in cities run by democrats with tons of money ??

Because local politics are all about keeping the streets clean and the water running. The policies which determine whether the economy will continue to thrive are not decisions made at the local level. Cities are struggling because far too many members of the gerrymandered House were Republicans who treat the cities as drains on the public purse, while pork barrelling vast sums of money for their home districts in rural America.

Republicans have basically eliminated infrastructure spending in their never ending effort to pay no taxes, and America's roads and bridges are crumbling and dangerous. Since wireless data services were left to the private sector to build, much of rural America still has dial up internet, and can't compete with modern, well funded European and Canadian infrastructure. There are areas of rural America where people don't have access to clean drinking water.

63 million Americans exposed to unsafe drinking water

Americans value cheap goods over their own citizens.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

progressive Stephine rhule BTW

im surprised thiers no video of her going around when she worked for bloomberg LOL

uh boy she gotz some splaning to do
lil mrs republican lol

I used to wake up the first thing i would do is turn on dabloomberg
Blomberg every morning

 

[McRocket]

LOL...really?

Exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically ('crush') alter the Real GDP Growth?

This should be good for a laugh because I have read some of your posts and you appear COMPLETELY clueless about macroeconomic matters.

I just listen to EXPERTS . Are you a expert? My roommate graduated from Harvard,, economics major.. do you know more then him?

LOL...yeah, and I am the Postmaster General. Nice spin, pal.

I will ask again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?

If you don’t know the trade deals I’m talking about,, why would I waste my time with a low iq person?? Bro turn on your internet or tv lol you are information deprived

Typical troll...makes up shit to get attention. And when someone calls him on it - he spins around like a top because he knows he has got squat.

LOL.

Hey pal...you made the initial claim. It is up to you to back it up...not the rest of us to prove it is wrong.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


Either answer the question or at least be a man (if you are one) and admit you cannot.

It’s every where look them up

Hey Trumpbot, you posted it.

'He will crush it if congress approves his trade deals'
Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

It's up to you to prove it - not me.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


A little advice pal, next time you want attention on a chat forum - try not to blurt out something when you actually have no idea if it is true or not. That way guys like me won't make you look silly when they ask you to prove your statement - and you neither can prove it nor dare admit that you have no idea if the statement was true or not.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Jitss617, post: 22171398

When democrats took over congress that’s when it got real bad

When a tax cutter Republican President ends up fucking up the entire global economy into the worst recession since the Great Depression it’s blame Congress.

So knowing that does the following mean you are on record here that you will not be blaming Democrats control of the House when Trumpo’s tax cuts do not produce revenue never seen before and end up rather just another failure of the trickle down tax cuts for the rich Republican con game?

FOR THE RECORD Jitss April 2019:

Jitss617, post: 22164704,

Trumps investment will drive revenue never seen before. It’s onky year two.. don’t melt snowflake

Q1 2019 Latest forecast: 2.3 percent — April 8, 2019

GDPNow - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Looks like the White House budget forecast is heading into a -1% hole to start the year. The WH needs probably at least 3.3% GDP growth for Q1 if they expect to finish 2019 well over 3.0% growth for the year and start seeing all that extra revenue to pay down the 1.5 trillion tax cut federal budget shortfall that is TrumpO’s gift to America.

So the rest of the year after Q1 Trumpo is gonna need some 4.0 qtrs in order to as you say “drive revenue never seen before”.

We have a TrumpOroid on record now.

Thank you very much for laying it all on the line for your cult master,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

easyt65, post: 22164622,

Yet poor sore loser butt-hurt, hate-driven, reality-denying snowflakes continue to whine, wail, lie, deny, justify, and attempt to minimize successes Obama NEVER accomplished while President.

My my, tRUMPo is a snowflake - minimizing his own 2.9 % GDP success:

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

That’s quite minimizing.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

tRUMPo has not crossed his own line in the sand that he claims is the line between a weak an anemic economy vs a MAGA economy.

Trouble is Trumpo has not crossed his own line? Why is that OK with TrumpORoids?

NotfooledbyW, post: 22164534

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

And tRUMPo is not heading in the right direction in 2019.

Q1 2019 Latest forecast: 2.3 percent — April 8, 2019

GDPNow - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

What’s wrong?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Progressive are fucking morons we need more taxes for government
government took to much WAHHHHHH
in one hole and out the other ....in reverse
Theyre not only complete idiots they're insanely hypocritical ...as some may already be aware of.

will obama win the war of gdp average proving once and for all ?
that obama is the light and that trump is indeed a racist homophobic nazi who inspires hate.

oh yeah we're all holding on with baited breath .

Presidents dont really make the economy , they can instill confidence
and sometimes presidents and lawmakers have a way of putting the breaks on it .


bunch of fags ...president lawmakers and suburbanites

the other day Hillary team on wall st ?
70% think its Trump for the win in 2020
if it cant be Trump who likes to give them the finger they want a new puppet
that would be Biden
I GUARANTEE YOU they dont give a flyin fuck about your mothers suburban gorilla twat and obamas past gdp performance

NOT ONE


carry on dumb asses

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

if you're to stupid to understand
this is what i used to do to fuckin young dork salesmen ...or women

they'd talk about a complete order how much we made how smooth it went with the factor or customers banking ....blah blah blah wasn't it awesome

NO
whats up for tomorrow was always my fuckin question

lightweights

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Deplorable Yankee, post: 22171567

will obama win the war of gdp average proving once and for all ?
that obama is the light and that trump is indeed a racist homophobic nazi who inspires hate.

.
I cannot find this question or any hint of it being found within the lines of my own OP on this thread.

“Will obama win the war of gdp average proving once and for all ? that obama is the light and that trump is indeed a racist homophobic nazi who inspires hate”

Here is my closing question for posters,

NotfooledbyW, post: 22164534

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

Where you get “obama is the light l” and “trump is indeed a racist homophobic nazi who inspires hate” from my OP shouid make you self reflect on the subject of your waning grasp on reality.

We all can help you if you wish but first you must show an effort to learn how to read.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Deplorable Yankee, post: 22171567

I GUARANTEE YOU they dont give a flyin fuck about your mothers suburban gorilla twat and obamas past gdp performance. NOT ONE

Idiot! This one does:

 

[Jitss617]

And liberals/democrats have done everything they could to hamper any growth.

Which was about nothing the first two years. Repubs had full control. But it's funny you still try to blame dems. Partisans are so very dumb.

Listen, how about I break it down to a level you may understand. Let's say I was adding a room onto a house, I have a deadline. Every third day you call the city to come out because you question something being done. What happens to my deadline?

Repubs have done everything to the economy they claimed would make it great again. They did their big tax cuts. They have eliminated regulations. Nobody stood in their way for 2 years. And even with huge deficits we didn't hit 3%. Sad.

Why are so many Americans struggling in cities run by democrats with tons of money ??

Because local politics are all about keeping the streets clean and the water running. The policies which determine whether the economy will continue to thrive are not decisions made at the local level. Cities are struggling because far too many members of the gerrymandered House were Republicans who treat the cities as drains on the public purse, while pork barrelling vast sums of money for their home districts in rural America.

Republicans have basically eliminated infrastructure spending in their never ending effort to pay no taxes, and America's roads and bridges are crumbling and dangerous. Since wireless data services were left to the private sector to build, much of rural America still has dial up internet, and can't compete with modern, well funded European and Canadian infrastructure. There are areas of rural America where people don't have access to clean drinking water.

63 million Americans exposed to unsafe drinking water

Americans value cheap goods over their own citizens.

Don’t filibuster here Lol answer the question you tard lol

 

[Faun]

I just listen to EXPERTS . Are you a expert? My roommate graduated from Harvard,, economics major.. do you know more then him?

LOL...yeah, and I am the Postmaster General. Nice spin, pal.

I will ask again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?

If you don’t know the trade deals I’m talking about,, why would I waste my time with a low iq person?? Bro turn on your internet or tv lol you are information deprived

Typical troll...makes up shit to get attention. And when someone calls him on it - he spins around like a top because he knows he has got squat.

LOL.

Hey pal...you made the initial claim. It is up to you to back it up...not the rest of us to prove it is wrong.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


Either answer the question or at least be a man (if you are one) and admit you cannot.

It’s every where look them up

Hey Trumpbot, you posted it.

'He will crush it if congress approves his trade deals'
Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

It's up to you to prove it - not me.

Once again...

exactly which trade deals are you talking about and where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that to implement these 'trade deals' will radically alter ('crush') the Real GDP Growth?


A little advice pal, next time you want attention on a chat forum - try not to blurt out something when you actually have no idea if it is true or not. That way guys like me won't make you look silly when they ask you to prove your statement - and you neither can prove it nor dare admit that you have no idea if the statement was true or not.

There are none. He was just trolling again.