Putin: Russia supports both Assad troops and rebels in battle against ISIS

Stratford57

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2014
8,429
8,258
2,255
Kievan Rus'
Russia supports Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces and will back anti-Assad rebels as long as they are fighting Islamic State, President Vladimir Putin told Germany’s Bild, countering claims that Moscow only backs the regime rather than hitting jihadists.
“We support both Assad’s army and the armed opposition,” Putin said in a lengthy recent interview to the newspaper, now published in full. “Some of them have publicly declared this, others prefer to remain silent, but the work is ongoing.”
According to the president, “This is hundreds, thousands of armed people fighting Islamic State [IS, previously ISIS/ISIL].”

“We are coordinating our joint operations with them and support their offensives by airstrikes in various sections of the front line,” Putin said.
The Western media has repeatedly criticized Russia over its airstrikes in Syria, claiming they only support the Assad regime and allegedly focus on hitting the Syrian opposition rather than IS.
“They are telling lies,” Putin reacted, when asked about the allegations. Despite the existence of evidence showing the facts on the ground, Russia’s critics “prefer to ignore it.”
“Look, the videos that support this version appeared before our pilots even started to carry out strikes against terrorists. This can be corroborated,” the president said.

By contrast, Putin brought up the deadly US airstrike on a hospital that killed over 20 people in northern Afghanistan in October and the following lack of mainstream media attention.
“American pilots hit the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, by mistake, I am sure,” he said. “Western media outlets have attempted to hush this up, to drop the subject and have a very short memory span when it comes to such things. They mentioned it a couple of times and put it on ice.” On the contrary, “this phony evidence” about Russian pilots allegedly targeting civilian targets “keeps circulating,” Putin added.
“If we tag the ‘live pipelines’ that consist of thousands of petrol and oil tankers as civilian targets, then, indeed, one might believe that our pilots are bombing these targets, but everyone is bombing them, including the Americans, the French and everyone else,” he said.
Explaining Russia’s goals in the conflict, Putin reiterated that the main concern is to avoid the creation of a complete power vacuum in Syria, leading to the devastation of the country, as happened in post-Gaddafi Libya.
I can tell you precisely what we do not want to happen: we do not want the Libyan or Iraqi scenario to be repeated in Syria,”he said.
In order to avoid such a turn of events, Syria should restructure its government, basing it on a new constitution, the Russian president said.
“This is the only way to achieve stability and security, to create conditions for economic growth and prosperity, so that people can live in their own homes, in their homeland, rather than flee to Europe,” Putin added.

Putin reiterated that the Syrian people should decide their own country’s future, regardless of whether Assad stays in his post.
“I assure you, if this process is conducted democratically, then Assad will probably not need to leave the country at all,” Putin said.
When asked if he would grant Assad asylum in Russia if he was forced to leave Syria, the President said it was
“premature”to speculate about that.
“We granted asylum to Mr. Snowden, which was far more difficult than to do the same for Mr. Assad,” he added.

Putin also responded to questions regarding Russia’s position on the global stage. He disagreed with US President Obama’s labeling of Russia as
“a regional power,” but added that Moscow is not striving to become a “superpower.”
“We do not claim the role of a superpower. This role is very costly and it is meaningless,
Putin said, pointing out that, in fact, the Russian economy occupies “roughly the sixth place in the world.”

Speaking at a nuclear summit at Dutch capital The Hague in March 2015, Obama referred to Russia as a “regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors.”
While admitting that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, Putin said that Obama’s remark was quite vague.
“If we say that Russia is a regional power, we should first determine what region we are referring to,” he said pointing out Russia’s vast geographical territory, which stretches from Europe, China and Japan to the maritime borders with Alaska in the US and “Canada across the Arctic Ocean.”
“I think that speculation about other countries, an attempt to speak disrespectfully about other countries, is an attempt to prove one’s exceptionalism by contrast. In my view, that is a misguided position,”
Putin said.

The interview also touched upon prospects for the renewal of Russia’s cooperation with the G8 and NATO. Both groups cut ties with Russia amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

“It was not Russia that cut off cooperation through the G8 or the Russia-NATO Council. We are willing to interact with everyone, once there is a matter for common discussion,” Putin said.
Yet, Russia will not go out of its way to be accepted back into these forums, he added, instead advocating a happy relationship
“when the feeling is mutual.”
“If we are not welcomed as partners, that’s fine with us then,”
the president said.

Russia-NATO ties worsened following Turkey’s downing of Russia’s Su-24 jet and the killing of its pilot by Ankara-backed Turkmen rebels on November 24. Shortly after the attack, Ankara called an emergency NATO meeting.
“Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey,” Putin said.
He expressed the hope that
“such incidents” would not trigger “large-scale hostilities,” but insisted that Russia “would defend its security interests by all available means at its disposal” should it be threatened.

Putin's comments were published as the second part of a wide-ranging interview to Bild, the mass-circulation German newspaper, conducted on January 5 at his residence in Sochi.
Russia supports both Assad troops and rebels in battle against ISIS – Putin

- My attitude to such issues as the fight against terrorism has not changed either. It is true, on September 11 I was the first to call President Bush and express my solidarity. Indeed, we stood ready to do everything to combat terrorism together. Not so long ago, after the terrorist attacks in Paris, I called and then met the President of France.

- You asked me if I was a friend or not. The relations between states are a little different from those between individuals. I am no friend, bride or groom; I am the President of the Russian Federation. That is 146 million people! These people have their own interests, and I must protect those interests. We are ready to do this in a non-confrontational manner, to look for compromise but, of course, based on international law, which must be understood uniformly by all.

- You spoke of sanctions. Everyone says that the Minsk Agreements must be implemented and then the sanctions issue may be reconsidered. This is beginning to resemble the theatre of the absurd because everything essential that needs to be done with regard to implementing the Minsk Agreements is the responsibility of the current Kiev authorities. You cannot demand that Moscow do something that needs to be done by Kiev. For example, the main, the key issue in the settlement process is political in its nature and the constitutional reform lies in its core. This is Point 11 of the Minsk Agreements. It expressly states that the constitutional reform must be carried out and it is not Moscow that is to make these decisions.


Full interview answering questions about fighting Islamic terrorism, Russian economy, sanctions, situation in Ukraine, Crimea etc. at:
Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 1
Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2
 
Ok and Merry Christmas Stratford I'm glad you are out there because you speak the truth.Oh my I've been making a fool of myself crying over David Bowie and trying to get back on political track.

We have this situation now with Iran. Putin is pulling this off perfectly. Oh that he is. Will Obama pull the trigger?
 
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2
 
Last edited:
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
 
Ok and Merry Christmas Stratford I'm glad you are out there because you speak the truth.

Thank you, Tiny. The only reason I'm on USMB is to bring a few rays of truth about Putin/Russia/Ukraine through powerful and ruthless Western propaganda machine. I am doing it for those who do want to know the truth. Those who don't are just hopeless.
 
Last edited:
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
Germany doesn't have a border with Russia.
 
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
Germany doesn't have a border with Russia.

To Turkey's border. Erdogan has been busted big time. But Merkel more. She moved troops to Turkey's border without going to parliament. It's a big deal.
 
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
Germany doesn't have a border with Russia.
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
Germany doesn't have a border with Russia.

To Turkey's border. Erdogan has been busted big time. But Merkel more. She moved troops to Turkey's border without going to parliament. It's a big deal.
Sorry misunderstood.
 
What worries me my friend is Erdogan.
I think that should worry all NATO members. BTW, Putin also mentioned it in his interview:

Putin: Turkey is a NATO member. However, the problems that have emerged have nothing to do with Turkey’s NATO membership; nobody has attacked Turkey. Instead of trying to provide us with an explanation for the war crime they committed, that is, for downing our fighter jet that was targeting terrorists, the Turkish government rushed to NATO headquarters seeking protection, which looks quite odd and, in my view, humiliating for Turkey.
I repeat, NATO has to protect its members from attack, but nobody has attacked Turkey. If Turkey has vested interests elsewhere in the world, in the adjacent countries, does it mean that NATO must protect and secure these interests? Does it mean that Germany, as a NATO member, must help Turkey to expand into neighbouring territories?

Interview to German newspaper Bild. Part 2

Merkel has moved troops to his border.

I'm sweating it my friend. And she did it without notifying her parliament.
Germany doesn't have a border with Russia.
urkey's border. Erdogan has been busted big time. But Merkel more. She moved troops to Turkey's border without going to parliament. It's a big deal.
Turkey doesn't have a border with Germany either.
 
Fresh news from Jan,15:

Lieutenant General Sergey Rudskoy, chief of the main operations department of the Russian General Staff, announced that up to 10,500 fighters of the democratic Syrian opposition have joined with government forces to oust Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) terrorists from Syrian territory. The armed opposition forces are playing “an increasing role” in the fight against terrorism, he said.

Defense Ministry spokesman General-Major Igor Konashenkov said: since the beginning of the air operation in Syria on September 30, the Russian Air Force has conducted 5,662 operational sorties, including 145 sorties made by strategic bombers from the territory of Russia. Altogether 97 cruise missiles have been launched from Russian warships in the Caspian Sea, a diesel submarine in the Mediterranean and from strategic bombers.

Also Igor Konashenkov said the ministry refutes Amnesty International’s allegations of the Russian air force delivering airstrikes on civilian installations in Syria.
Rudskoi said Moscow is set to continue to inform the international public about the results of the airstrikes delivered by the US-led coalition in Syria to avoid falsifications.

“In case our colleagues stay quiet about the results of their bombings in Syria, we will have to inform the public of such facts ourselves,” Rudskoi said. “If someone does not realize that, that’s too bad.”
“Over just 100 days of the Russian Air Force operation in Syria, Islamic State lost control over 217 communities; over 1,000 sq. kilometers have been liberated, Rudskoi said.

The Russian military is maintaining logistics support for a humanitarian operation in Syria aimed to provide the civilian population with basic needs. International humanitarian missions have so far been providing aid to regions which remain under terrorist control.
Although a number of non-governmental organizations have been providing humanitarian aid on Syrian territory, most of the supplies sent have ended up on territories controlled by terrorists.

A Syrian Ilyushin Il-76 jumbo jet has already delivered the first batch of humanitarian aid to the Syrian city of Deir ez-Zor, Rudskoy said. At present, most of the aid is being channeled to Deir ez-Zor, which was under siege by terrorists for a long period of time, Rudskoy said. The first 22 tons of humanitarian aid have been airdropped from a Syrian Il-76 using Russian parachute platform airdrop systems. Supplies are set to continue, Rudskoy said, stressing that Russia will provide the Syrian people with all possible help to liberate the country from extremists and return peace to the nation.

Russian army launches humanitarian op in Syria - General Staff
 

Forum List

Back
Top