Iraqi Shia Moslems Report Secular Kamikaz ISIS Torching Their Own Troops For Losing Ramadi

[mascale]

So the world wonders about Mosul, now after Moslems of the actual Faith: Recaptured Ramadi, in Iraq. The secular kamikazes--not of the faith--publically torched their own troops in some nature of retaliation for having lost Ramadi to the actual Moslems. Their own version of a secular Caliphate--having nothing to do with a successor to Mohammed, the Prophet--was seriously crippled.

ISIS burns its fighters alive for losing Ramadi to Iraqi troops - Iraqi News

So the diplomacy of Secretaries Clinton and Kerry has slowly paid off. It is not an effigy of President Obama being torched by Anti-Americans--now grabbing the headlines. Curiously, it is anti-Americans being torched by Anti-Americans that is grabbing the local headlines.

Mosul will apparently require an even greater diplomatically engaged creation. That could even await a President Clinton. There appears to be some engagement, via email, of likely helpful personnel(?). It does not seem likely that the Charitable Foundation will be engaged, like it never was before.

The solution on the ground gets actually noted by the participants on the ground. Both sides--Moslems and Secular Kamikazes--seem already aware of how that works, or is pretended to work. One maybe does follow Mohammed. The other method appears more Nazi and SS, and not Moslem.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Arriving late maybe better strategy, for White Eyes At Little Big Horn--planning to survive!)

 

[Two Thumbs]

As crazy and evil as that is, it's also brilliant.

Tsun Tsu taught that putting your men on death ground, they fight harder and better since they are focused on the fight and not thinking about the option of running.

Now all isis fights are to the last man, victory or death.

 

[bendog]

How game of thrones. LOL

 

[Obiwan]

So the world wonders about Mosul, now after Moslems of the actual Faith: Recaptured Ramadi, in Iraq. The secular kamikazes--not of the faith--publically torched their own troops in some nature of retaliation for having lost Ramadi to the actual Moslems. Their own version of a secular Caliphate--having nothing to do with a successor to Mohammed, the Prophet--was seriously crippled.

ISIS burns its fighters alive for losing Ramadi to Iraqi troops - Iraqi News

So the diplomacy of Secretaries Clinton and Kerry has slowly paid off. It is not an effigy of President Obama being torched by Anti-Americans--now grabbing the headlines. Curiously, it is anti-Americans being torched by Anti-Americans that is grabbing the local headlines.

Mosul will apparently require an even greater diplomatically engaged creation. That could even await a President Clinton. There appears to be some engagement, via email, of likely helpful personnel(?). It does not seem likely that the Charitable Foundation will be engaged, like it never was before.

The solution on the ground gets actually noted by the participants on the ground. Both sides--Moslems and Secular Kamikazes--seem already aware of how that works, or is pretended to work. One maybe does follow Mohammed. The other method appears more Nazi and SS, and not Moslem.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Arriving late maybe better strategy, for White Eyes At Little Big Horn--planning to survive!)

Exactly where do Hillary, Kerry, and Obozo figure into this????

We know they enabled and armed ISIS, but did they buy the gas for the BBQ too????

 

[mascale]

The Baathists that the Republicans unleashed on the planet--clearly intending harm of baby genitalia--terrorists, the creation of Bush-Cheney. Not only did Sunni leader, Sadaam Hussein get overthrown: All the rest of the Baathists were barred from the new Iraqi regime. That regime would soon be mostly Shia. Where now are the Baathist military and leaders? Famously they are identified with Sunni ISIS in Syria. Before that happened, however, the Arab Spring had to happen to create a semblance of regard and affection for the West. There would not be multi-continent Jihad declared, or on-going. Bush-Cheney Conservatives appear to have intended that outcome. Clinton-Kerry-Obama were a contrary force, with a different policy and agenda.

In the Middle East, there was a major anti-American hangover from Bush-Cheney. That is now evident in where some semblance of Syria is located. Iran had to be engaged, to counter that problem. Iran is Shia. An Iran-Deal happened.

And all of that pales in the face of having to actually be on the ground, having to re-take Mosul. All that diplomacy did have to happen. The Republicans are so-far famously engaged in accusing the Democrats of having made it happen. Now it is far more ready to start happening, having already started happening.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Weapons of Mass Destruction(?), caused this(?)!)

 

[Obiwan]

The Baathists that the Republicans unleashed on the planet--clearly intending harm of baby genitalia--terrorists, the creation of Bush-Cheney. Not only did Sunni leader, Sadaam Hussein get overthrown: All the rest of the Baathists were barred from the new Iraqi regime. That regime would soon be mostly Shia. Where now are the Baathist military and leaders? Famously they are identified with Sunni ISIS in Syria. Before that happened, however, the Arab Spring had to happen to create a semblance of regard and affection for the West. There would not be multi-continent Jihad declared, or on-going. Bush-Cheney Conservatives appear to have intended that outcome. Clinton-kerry-Obama were a contrary force, with a different policy and agenda.

In the Middle East, there was a major anti-American hangover from Bush-Cheney. That is now evident in where some semblance of Syria is located. Iran had to be engaged, to counter that problem. Iran is Shia. An Iran-Deal happened.

And all of that pales in the face of having to actually be on the ground, having to re-take Mosul. All that diplomacy did have to happen. The Republicans are so-far famously engaged in accusing the Democrats of having made it happen. Now it is far more ready to start happening, having already started happening.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"

That is probably the most incoherent babbling I've heard on USMB in the last year...

Are you drunk or into the peyote again???

 

[waltky]

Mooslumics murder their own miscreant misfits...

... film at 11.

 

[bripat9643]

So the world wonders about Mosul, now after Moslems of the actual Faith: Recaptured Ramadi, in Iraq. The secular kamikazes--not of the faith--publically torched their own troops in some nature of retaliation for having lost Ramadi to the actual Moslems. Their own version of a secular Caliphate--having nothing to do with a successor to Mohammed, the Prophet--was seriously crippled.

ISIS burns its fighters alive for losing Ramadi to Iraqi troops - Iraqi News

So the diplomacy of Secretaries Clinton and Kerry has slowly paid off. It is not an effigy of President Obama being torched by Anti-Americans--now grabbing the headlines. Curiously, it is anti-Americans being torched by Anti-Americans that is grabbing the local headlines.

Mosul will apparently require an even greater diplomatically engaged creation. That could even await a President Clinton. There appears to be some engagement, via email, of likely helpful personnel(?). It does not seem likely that the Charitable Foundation will be engaged, like it never was before.

The solution on the ground gets actually noted by the participants on the ground. Both sides--Moslems and Secular Kamikazes--seem already aware of how that works, or is pretended to work. One maybe does follow Mohammed. The other method appears more Nazi and SS, and not Moslem.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Arriving late maybe better strategy, for White Eyes At Little Big Horn--planning to survive!)

What does Hillary's so-called "diplomacy" have to do with this event?

You're babbling incoherently. Rational people can't even determine what the point of your screed is.

 

[mascale]

Secular Kamikazes, more like SS and the Nazis, tend mainly to do themselves in. This appears to have further happened in Istanbul.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe not good idea to even stir up Fire Ant mounds in summer. . .or winter. . .destabilizing a region. . .or even worse, some pasture(?)!)

 

[bripat9643]

Secular Kamikazes, more like SS and the Nazis, tend mainly to do themselves in. This appears to have further happened in Istanbul.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe not good idea to even stir up Fire Ant mounds in summer. . .or winter. . .destabilizing a region. . .or even worse, some pasture(?)!)

You're tying yourself into rhetorical knots trying to paint Hillary and Obama as the heroes of this story. They created ISIS. There's little dispute among rational people about that.

 

[mascale]

From October 12, 2012, Reuters--and before ISIS, a U. S. Secretary of State. After these kinds of efforts, the Ramadi success could not only be envisioned, but could happen. The Democrats did not force the Baathists into Syria, who could have otherwise been useful and helpful in Iraq.
________________________________________________________

The United States must look past the violence and extremism that has erupted after the "Arab Spring" revolutions and boost support for the region's young democracies to forge long-term security, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Friday.

Clinton, seeking to reinforce the Obama administration's Middle East policy following a wave of anti-American violence and last month's deadly attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, said Washington cannot be deterred by "the violent acts of a small number of extremists."

"We recognize that these transitions are not America's to manage, and certainly not ours to win or lose," Clinton said in a speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

"But we have to stand with those who are working every day to strengthen democratic institutions, defend universal rights, and drive inclusive economic growth. That will produce more capable partners and more durable security over the long term."

Middle East unrest has become fodder for the U.S. presidential campaign, where Republican candidate Mitt Romney has sought to portray President Barack Obama as an ineffectual leader who has left the United States vulnerable at a time of international crisis.

Romney and other Republicans have focused on the September 11 Benghazi attack, which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, accusing the Obama administration of security and intelligence lapses in what officials now describe as a terrorist attack.

Clinton noted that the Benghazi incident was the subject of an official probe and vowed the United States would track down those responsible for the attack.

But she stressed that U.S. diplomats must engage with an uncertain and dangerous world if they are to promote and protect U.S. interests. "We will never prevent every act of violence or terrorism, or achieve perfect security. Our people cannot live in bunkers and do their jobs," she said.

'UNDIMMED PROMISE?'

Clinton acknowledged that political turmoil in Libya and Yemen, the rise of Islamist parties to power in Egypt and Tunisia and the expanding crisis in Syria were all tests for U.S. leadership - but said more engagement, not less, was the only way forward.

"For the United States, supporting democratic transitions is not a matter of idealism. It is a strategic necessity," she said.

And she pointed to the "undimmed promise of the Arab Spring" in the backlash against extremist groups in Libya and Tunisia, saying that in many cases newly empowered Arab societies were standing up for peaceful, pluralistic democratic principles.

Clinton pointed to the challenge in Egypt, where on Friday liberals and Islamists clashed in the first street violence since Islamist President Mohamed Mursi took power in June, injuring more than 100 people.

"We stand with the Egyptian people in their quest for universal freedoms and protections," Clinton said. "Egypt's international standing does depend both on peaceful relations with its neighbors and also on the choices it makes at home and whether or not it fulfills its own promises to its own people."

The Obama administration has earmarked some $1 billion in assistance for countries emerging from the Arab Spring revolutions, and has asked Congress for a separate $770 million fund tied to specific political and economic reforms.

But Republican lawmakers remain wary, citing political uncertainties in the region and the need for careful accounting in an era of fast-rising budget deficits.

Clinton urged the lawmakers to release the money, citing U.S.-sponsored programs and security partnerships she said could both reinforce democratic gains and increase pressure on extremist groups.

"We have, as always, to be clear-eyed about the threat of violent extremism. A year of democratic transition was never going to drain away reservoirs of radicalism built up through decades of dictatorship," she said.
_______________________________________

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(More engagement in Mideast now finding U.S. friends in Mideast, successfully pushing back!)

 

[Two Thumbs]

trolling your own thread and changing the subject

bizarre