Proof Biden ignores the Constitution.

[rightwinger]

All you have to do is read this in its entirety. Whining about the source won’t work here. If you disagree prove anything in the article wrong with credible links.

This documents several actions that prove he ignores the Constitution.

Joe Biden and the left are putting the rule of law at risk

Last year, President Biden announced a $500 billion cancellation of federal student loans but the Supreme Court ruled in June that Biden’s loan cancellation was an illegal power grab.

nypost.com

OMG!

Why don’t you take Biden to Court?

 

[Marener]

~~~~~~
Congress has not appropriated funds. Therefore Biden is misappropriating funds from other place. That is Unconstitutional.

Student loan forgiveness does not require reappropriate of funds. Congress appropriated the funds when they created student loan program.

 

[Concerned American]

~~~~~~
Congress has not appropriated funds. Therefore Biden is misappropriating funds from other place. That is Unconstitutional.

You can't confront this moron with facts. He just parrots the same old democrat bullshit over and over.

 

[Concerned American]

Student loan forgiveness does not require reappropriate of funds. Congress appropriated the funds when they created student loan program.

With the requirement that said "LOAN" be REPAID. Deadbeat.

 

[Marener]

With the requirement that said "LOAN" be REPAID. Deadbeat.

Congress provided the Secretary statutory authority to modify loan requirements.

 

[Dr.Know]

WAHHHH I dont give a fxck if we destroy the country, let multinationals rape 3rd world countries, destroy our way of life, flood the USA with millions of DEEP STATE VOTERS that will lower our wages, give us GMO food poison, pollute the environment, monitor our every THOUGHT and move,,,take all of our possessions, Let criminals wreak havoc in exchange for votes, start wars all around the globe for profit while killing women and children,,,WWAAHHHHHHH AS LONG AS I CAN FEEL GOOD ABOUT MYSELF !!!! Deep State Biden 2024

 

[busybee01]

Tater doesn't have the power to unilaterally appropriate funds, no matter how much it is. Both are clearly unconstitutional.

He was not appropriating funds. He was exercising the rights granted to him under several laws. The Supreme Court ignored the rule of law. None of the parties had standing as they suffered no harm. If the Congress disagrees then they can pass a law.

 

[bripat9643]

He’s not appropriating funds.

Of course he is. Cancelling student loan debt is appropriating funds.

 

[bripat9643]

He was not appropriating funds. He was exercising the rights granted to him under several laws. The Supreme Court ignored the rule of law. None of the parties had standing as they suffered no harm. If the Congress disagrees then they can pass a law.

Wrong, canceling a debt owed to the United States is the same as appropriating those funds.

 

[Marener]

Of course he is. Cancelling student loan debt is appropriating funds.

Funds are appropriated when the loan is made.

 

[Nostra]

Student loan forgiveness does not require reappropriate of funds. Congress appropriated the funds when they created student loan program.

Loan program, stupid. Not a handout. Once you change it you are spending money.

 

[Nostra]

Congress provided the Secretary statutory authority to modify loan requirements.

The SC addressed that. I thought you said you read the decision, Moroner.

 

[Nostra]

He was not appropriating funds. He was exercising the rights granted to him under several laws. The Supreme Court ignored the rule of law. None of the parties had standing as they suffered no harm. If the Congress disagrees then they can pass a law.

The SC says you are full of shit.

 

[Marener]

The SC addressed that. I thought you said you read the decision, Moroner.

I did. They relied on the major questions doctrine which held that they used the statutory authority to go beyond what Congress intended (because they can read the minds of Congress better than the text of the law they wrote).

So Biden made a smaller program. We will see if the smaller program equates to “major” or not because SCOTUS didn’t draw a line. We have to have separate decisions for every program.

 

[Doc7505]

Congress provided the Secretary statutory authority to modify loan requirements.

Which was not passed for what it is being used for.

"Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act United States federal legislation"

​

Description​

The Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act, or Heroes Act, was proposed legislation acting as a $3 trillion stimulus package in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, intended to supplement the earlier CARES Act stimulus package. Wikipedia
Originally published: May 15, 2020

 

[Marener]

Which was not passed for what it is being used for

Then they should have specified that in the language.

As it stands, the law gives the secretary that authority.

 

[Clipper]

Thank you for informing us, but no, I wouldn't repeat that. I am not a Biden supporter.

This is what you support. A moron:

Thank you for informing us, but no, I wouldn't repeat that. I am not a Biden supporter.

Here's what you support in all his glory:

 

[Clipper]

No foolish rant, moron. Tater is trying to do the same thing again. Holy shit, please try to get educated on a topic before spouting off just once in your pathetic life, loser.

Biden is doing no such thing, assclown. So raaaaaaant on.

BTW, to close out the year I thought you might want to take a good look at your two fav subhuman washed up tough guys in all their shitfaced glory:

 

[bripat9643]

Then they should have specified that in the language.

As it stands, the law gives the secretary that authority.

It doesn't give him authority to change the whole point of the program, which was LOANING money for education, not giving it.

 

[yidnar]

are they in your recliner watching your gigantic ass descend ?