Timmy
Gold Member
- Oct 2, 2015
- 22,432
- 2,836
- 290
You must be referring to the plan that rewards women for having more babies. That needs to be cut. If a woman can''t afford to have babies, it's not up to taxpayers to support them. She should go out and get a job.Once again, give us an example of someone who thinks like that. And who are you to say what suffering is sufficient to end the life of a fetus? There have been many with serious birth defects that have managed to live a life worth living, despite their handicaps. Helen Keller is just one example. Born blind and deaf, she still managed to live a life that many would envy.These people do not care about any living thing but require any potential living thing to be born regardless of the suffering it will endure.Show me one pro-lifer who doesn't care about babies.
The Cons are out to cut billions in food stamps and other welfare programs that benefit poor families .
The wic program is actually a prenatal / newborn nutrition program .
Trump budget threatens nutrition services for poor women and children
I gave you an example of the gop plan! You just ignore it.
Prenatal care is rewarding them?
You don’t want abortions , but you expect women who are not ready to have children. To suddenly get a job to support the kid ? How does that work in REALITY .
Guess Cons don’t love babies after all do they?