R
rdean
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
Considering we do not block foriegn media broadcasts, who owns what is currently a moot point.
Also, do you object as well to Al-Jazzera having an american brocasting arm? what about the BBC?
So, you actually think that HEARING foreign news is the same as having our news CONTROLLED by foreign interests?
This is another example of the boiled frog. Those who don't remember what it was like to have honest journalism don't realize just how bad it is now.
And, there is no way you can pretend that this was not sneaked in by the GObP. I have posted this before and you fools are just too dumb to GET IT. When the FCC was gutted, it was under GObP control (pres was Michael Powell - Just think about THAT).
Be that as it may, most Americans get their news from a foreign controlled "news" corporation. Most don't know that they are being duped every single day. And, those that do know (like this board) just don't give a flying fuck.
When are you going to wise up?
When will people realize that the GObP is quietly spoon feeding us propaganda that is harmful to our country, to the future of our country?
I haven't read the posts but I'll bet that the rw's are saying what they always say. Their heads firmly stuffed up their own behinds, they are criticizing the source and/or the poster. They do this because they know they are in the wrong and they don't have the brains or the integrity to educate themselves and decide to be on the side of their own country.
How is owning 7% of a stock "controlling"
It's really quite "simple". I'm embarrassed to have to explain something you could find out with 5 minutes of using Google.
The Prince's 7% added with Murdoch's means that Murdoch can't be subject to a "hostile take over". Three billion is a lot. And Murdoch owns a significant share of the Prince's media empire. Their fortunes are entwined. That's why the prince can boast about changing Fox programming. He wouldn't make the claim if it weren't true.