Presidential Nominee Kerry Video

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ajwps, Aug 25, 2004.

  1. ajwps
    Offline

    ajwps Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,302
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +46
  2. tpahl
    Offline

    tpahl Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    662
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Cascadia
    Ratings:
    +3
    Hopefully this will get to all the voters out there that want a peace president and think that Kerry their man. The peace candidate is Badnarik.
     
  3. ajwps
    Offline

    ajwps Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,302
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +46

    Kerry and Badnaik are both peace and war candidates. Badnaik wants to wait for the war to come to America and Kerry is for/against President Bush's plan.

    Is Badnaik a recovered cocaine addict?
     
  4. lilcountriegal
    Offline

    lilcountriegal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,633
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +59
    Its a long one, but worth it. Anyone considering Kerry should watch this..
     
  5. tpahl
    Offline

    tpahl Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    662
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Cascadia
    Ratings:
    +3
    Kerry is quite postively for war now in Iraq. He was for it before it started and he is clear about it now that he is for the war now.

    Badnarik has made it clear he was against the war before it started and is against it now. He is not opposed to war in general you are right. But he is opposed to the war in question. Kerry is not.

    Kerry is a war candidate. Badnarik is the peace candidate.
     
  6. lilcountriegal
    Offline

    lilcountriegal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,633
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +59
    Kerry is never "quite positively" for anything. He changes so much it's hard to remember which side of the issue he chooses this week. Did you not watch the entire video? Something tells me you didnt... Kerry's back adn forth's on the war in Iraq are well documented through that entire clip...
     
  7. Hemi_man
    Offline

    Hemi_man Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Maineville, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +1
    I always knew this, but it is disgusting to see it put together like that.

    Man, Kerry really makes me sick.

    Hemi_man

    :blowup:
     
  8. tpahl
    Offline

    tpahl Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    662
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Cascadia
    Ratings:
    +3
    Even in the video it is clear he is for the war just opposed to bush. Not quite logical i admit, but it obvious to me that kerry is for the war, will be for the war and will take us to more wars in the future. :tank: :firing:
     
  9. ajwps
    Offline

    ajwps Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,302
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +46
    Bush is steadfast in protecting America from attack at home.

    Kerry is steadfast for protecting his run at the presidency and is therefore both for Iraq war and against Iraq war and sometimes neither or nor.

    Badnarik is for a peaceul Islamic destruction of New York and Los Angeles. An isolationist following an attack on our shores is a madman ready to have everybody commit suicide.
     
  10. Merlin1047
    Offline

    Merlin1047 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,500
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AL
    Ratings:
    +450
    That is not an accurate observation. It is flawed because it is based on the highly unreliable statements of the grand-champion waffler of all time. The truth is that you cannot reliably characterize kerry as anything but a bald-faced, lying opportunist.

    But let's discuss the "peace" versus "war" candidate label.

    Badnarik opposes the war in Iraq. From what I understand about his statements, he would not attack anyone unless and until we were invaded. Well, we HAVE been invaded. There is an untold number of terrorists lurking on our shores right now. We have been attacked - numerous times, the 9-11 attack being only the most recent and most devastating.

    If Badnarik would take no hostile action, does that make him a "peace" candidate? To the contrary. Given the mentality of the terrorists who are attacking us, a failure to act is an invitation for more attacks. In my view that makes George Bush the true peace candidate because he seeks to prevent further attacks on us by finding and killing our enemies. Badnarik, on the other hand, believes in doing nothing to retaliate for the attacks on us. By adopting his stance we merely invite more of the same. So the way I look at it, that makes Badnarik the war candidate.
     

Share This Page