Preacher
Gold Member
US proposes extra tariffs on $50B in Chinese products to protest tech theft
Awesome! Kick some ass President Trump!
Awesome! Kick some ass President Trump!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
President Trump hits back at China with tariffs
- Thread starter Preacher
- Start date
IsaacNewton
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2015
- 17,308
- 3,697
- 290
Morons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
I know, right?
He's protecting technology that primarily comes from California while China hits back with tariffs against products that hurt Trump's supporters in the Midwest.
lol
He's protecting technology that primarily comes from California while China hits back with tariffs against products that hurt Trump's supporters in the Midwest.
lol
/——/ We dropped our pants for China for decades, it’s about time we had a president who stood up for AmericaMorons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
DJT for Life
Gold Member
- Jun 21, 2017
- 3,468
- 899
- 195
The Chinese made the mistake of only adding tariff's to a few items.
There is no doubt they are only saving face with their tariff's and do not
want a trade war.
Hit Back Donald and hit back Hard.
There is no doubt they are only saving face with their tariff's and do not
want a trade war.
Hit Back Donald and hit back Hard.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 28,308
- 25,083
- 2,405
I love this response, it's basically an answer to China who hit America with tariffs on $3B, which were strategically placed on GOP candidates areas.
"Oh yeah ya little Intellectual Property thieving sob's? I will see your $3B and hit you with $50B more, AND a complaint with the toothless WTO just for kicks".
Let see who gets hit most, China who has a $500B a year fleecing of America, or the U.S.
"Oh yeah ya little Intellectual Property thieving sob's? I will see your $3B and hit you with $50B more, AND a complaint with the toothless WTO just for kicks".
Let see who gets hit most, China who has a $500B a year fleecing of America, or the U.S.
- Feb 22, 2017
- 105,395
- 35,805
- 2,290
I love this response, it's basically an answer to China who hit America with tariffs on $3B, which were strategically placed on GOP candidates areas.
"Oh yeah ya little Intellectual Property thieving sob's? I will see your $3B and hit you with $50B more, AND a complaint with the toothless WTO just for kicks".
Let see who gets hit most, China who has a $500B a year fleecing of America, or the U.S.
The US will as the price of everything goes up and that tax cuts gets eaten up and then some.
What happens when they throw a tariff on our soybeans and the grain farmers now have no market. In the US this year there is for only the 3 time in history more soybeans planned to be planted than corn. Going to suck hard when the floor drops out of the market.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 28,308
- 25,083
- 2,405
The Chinese made the mistake of only adding tariff's to a few items.
There is no doubt they are only saving face with their tariff's and do not
want a trade war.
Hit Back Donald and hit back Hard.
He is a counter puncher, they should have sat quietly and accepted they were screwing America over good so best to not remind him what a dirty government the Communists run. Instead they strategically select some products designed to hurt his supporters.
Wrong move. Now duck ya Commie sob's!
- Feb 22, 2017
- 105,395
- 35,805
- 2,290
maybe Trump is getting a tiny bit smarter, he waited till the end of the day to drop this announcement so the market would have at least one up day
US proposes extra tariffs on $50B in Chinese products to protest tech theft
Awesome! Kick some ass President Trump!
no... china smacked Donald. Donald didn't kick snitching. he's a moron.
:The Chinese made the mistake of only adding tariff's to a few items.
There is no doubt they are only saving face with their tariff's and do not
want a trade war.
Hit Back Donald and hit back Hard.
So you think the Chinese are going to cower in a corner. The trade war is not in second gear...
The Chinese made the mistake of only adding tariff's to a few items.
There is no doubt they are only saving face with their tariff's and do not
want a trade war.
Hit Back Donald and hit back Hard.
He is a counter puncher, they should have sat quietly and accepted they were screwing America over good so best to not remind him what a dirty government the Communists run. Instead they strategically select some products designed to hurt his supporters.
Wrong move. Now duck ya Commie sob's!
Ya...China will now go away sobbing...or they might just demand payment of ALL of our debt to them...which should reach a record this year.
maybe Trump is getting a tiny bit smarter, he waited till the end of the day to drop this announcement so the market would have at least one up day
trump getting smart....right....
TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #15
Yeah. Those fuckers better raise their prices and start charging us more, or we'll FORCE them to!/——/ We dropped our pants for China for decades, it’s about time we had a president who stood up for AmericaMorons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
- May 17, 2013
- 67,998
- 33,092
- 2,290
https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/China 2017 WTO Report.pdf
Furthermore, it is now clear that the WTO rules are not sufficient to constrain China’s market-distorting behavior. While some problematic policies and practices being pursued by the Chinese government have been found by WTO panels or the Appellate Body to run afoul of China’s WTO obligations, many of the most troubling ones are not directly disciplined by WTO rules or the additional commitments that China made in its Protocol of Accession. The reality is that the WTO rules were not formulated with a state-led economy in mind, and while the extra commitments that China made in its Protocol of Accession disciplined certain stateled policies and practices existing in 2001, the Chinese government has since replaced them with more sophisticated – and still very troubling – policies and practices.Today, almost two decades after it pledged to support the multilateral trading system of the WTO, the Chinese government pursues a wide array of continually evolving interventionist policies and practices aimed at limiting market access for imported goods and services and foreign manufacturers and services suppliers. At the same time, China offers substantial government guidance, resources and regulatory support to Chinese industries, including through initiatives designed to extract advanced technologies from foreign companies in sectors across the economy. The principal beneficiaries of China’s policies and practices are Chinese state-owned enterprises and other significant domestic companies attempting to move up the economic value chain. As a result, markets all over the world are less efficient than they should be.
Furthermore, it is now clear that the WTO rules are not sufficient to constrain China’s market-distorting behavior. While some problematic policies and practices being pursued by the Chinese government have been found by WTO panels or the Appellate Body to run afoul of China’s WTO obligations, many of the most troubling ones are not directly disciplined by WTO rules or the additional commitments that China made in its Protocol of Accession. The reality is that the WTO rules were not formulated with a state-led economy in mind, and while the extra commitments that China made in its Protocol of Accession disciplined certain stateled policies and practices existing in 2001, the Chinese government has since replaced them with more sophisticated – and still very troubling – policies and practices.Today, almost two decades after it pledged to support the multilateral trading system of the WTO, the Chinese government pursues a wide array of continually evolving interventionist policies and practices aimed at limiting market access for imported goods and services and foreign manufacturers and services suppliers. At the same time, China offers substantial government guidance, resources and regulatory support to Chinese industries, including through initiatives designed to extract advanced technologies from foreign companies in sectors across the economy. The principal beneficiaries of China’s policies and practices are Chinese state-owned enterprises and other significant domestic companies attempting to move up the economic value chain. As a result, markets all over the world are less efficient than they should be.
/——-/ We sell very few cars to the Chinks because they add a $35,000 tariff to each one. And you’re ok with one sided deals as long as it hurts America.Yeah. Those fuckers better raise their prices and start charging us more, or we'll FORCE them to!/——/ We dropped our pants for China for decades, it’s about time we had a president who stood up for AmericaMorons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
- May 17, 2013
- 67,998
- 33,092
- 2,290
2017 DEVELOPMENTS On the bilateral front, the United States and China agreed to four new high-level dialogues at the summit meeting between President Trump and China’s President Xi held in April 2017 in Mar-a-Lago, Florida. The new dialogue covering trade and investment issues, known as the U.S.-China Comprehensive Economic Dialogue (CED), was chaired on the U.S. side by the Treasury Secretary and the Commerce Secretary and on the Chinese side by a Vice Premier, Wang Yang. In addition to trade and investment issues, the CED’s mandate also extended to macroeconomic policy, financial stability, currency and energy issues. Discussions under the auspices of the CED began shortly after the Mar-a-Lago summit meeting, with the U.S. side agreeing to China’s proposed 100-day action plan. In May 2017, the two sides agreed to certain initial results for this action plan, with each side committing to five outcomes for the other side. The outcomes secured from China by the U.S. side largely focused on overdue actions by Chinese regulatory authorities, rather than any fundamental changes to China’s trade and investment regime. Specifically, these outcomes included a resumption in market access for U.S. beef, a commitment to render decisions on certain pending U.S. biotechnology product applications, the lifting of certain investment restrictions on foreign suppliers of credit rating and credit investigation services, further steps toward the licensing of foreign suppliers of electronic payment services and the issuance of bond underwriting and settlement licenses to two U.S. companies
TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #19
Yeah we need big gubmint to punish us the way China punishes their citizens so we can't afford nice things! Go MAGA!!!/——-/ We sell very few cars to the Chinks because they add a $35,000 tariff to each one. And you’re ok with one sided deals as long as it hurts America.Yeah. Those fuckers better raise their prices and start charging us more, or we'll FORCE them to!/——/ We dropped our pants for China for decades, it’s about time we had a president who stood up for AmericaMorons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
/——-/ So what’s your solution to the one sided tariffs, bend over more ?Yeah we need big gubmint to punish us the way China punishes their citizens so we can't afford nice things! Go MAGA!!!/——-/ We sell very few cars to the Chinks because they add a $35,000 tariff to each one. And you’re ok with one sided deals as long as it hurts America.Yeah. Those fuckers better raise their prices and start charging us more, or we'll FORCE them to!/——/ We dropped our pants for China for decades, it’s about time we had a president who stood up for AmericaMorons unite. The dear leader leads his lemmings over the cliff. The only question is how many hundreds of thousands of American jobs will be lost.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 231
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 381
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 334
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 245
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 63
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8129
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-