Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
Hey shitnow:
We haven't "started" any wars that "murder [sic] millions [sic]."
The balance of your gibberish-laden post suggests that you are either high, drunk or just incapable of forming a coherent sentence.
That could be, I just feel if assassinating citizens is ok, whats wrong with assassinating world leaders and other government flunkies? Got a problem with that you sniveling little coward?
snip
If a guy is trying to "light up" downtown Denver as part of his "war" against the United States, killing him in the act is just what happens in war. The enemy gets killed. A guys' status as a U.S. citizen shouldn't cause anybody to hesitate in dropping that guy on the spot if he's caught in the act of attempting to commit such an atrocity.
snip
Condensed that because this is the only part of the post that I am discussing here.
We do that kind of thing all the time. Law enforcement sometimes has to take deadly force measures to protect citizens from felons who are in the process of committing a crime. But that is not what is happening here. If Al-Awlaki were killed attempting to commit a crime that would be one thing. If he is seen on the streets of Sanaa (Yes, I had to look up the name of the capital of Yemen) and a real life Jack Bauer puts a bullet in his head, that is completely different.
Hell, for all we know, Al-Awlaki could be a TV star in Yemen and simply be playing a terrorist on their version of "24" and those tapes that allegedly exist are only part of the program. Those are the kind of things that a trial are supposed to bring out. And this is the kind of thing that the U.S. Constitution is supposed to protect us from: a potentially over-zealous government.
Immie
Last edited: