Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I know. Of which Levine was certainly not qualified to nominate.it is curious that the nobelprize.org page changed the wording in 2007 from:
Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize
Nomination to the Nobel Peace Prize is by invitation only. The Nobel Committee sends confidential forms to persons who are competent and qualified to nominate. The names of the nominees and other information about the nominations cannot be revealed until 50 years later.
to this currently:
Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize
Every year, the Norwegian Nobel Committee sends out thousands of letters inviting qualified people to submit their nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize. The names of the nominees and other information about the nominations cannot be revealed until 50 years later.
don't forget that this conversation centered around the non-nomination of limbaugh for the nobel peace prize
I know. Of which Levine was certainly not qualified to nominate.it is curious that the nobelprize.org page changed the wording in 2007 from:
Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize
Nomination to the Nobel Peace Prize is by invitation only. The Nobel Committee sends confidential forms to persons who are competent and qualified to nominate. The names of the nominees and other information about the nominations cannot be revealed until 50 years later.
to this currently:
Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize
Every year, the Norwegian Nobel Committee sends out thousands of letters inviting qualified people to submit their nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize. The names of the nominees and other information about the nominations cannot be revealed until 50 years later.
don't forget that this conversation centered around the non-nomination of limbaugh for the nobel peace prize
Pretty certain they did not change the "by invitation only" requirement.
It may have been due to just an attempt to make the Nobel site's web paragraph more concise.
That we know of...I know. Of which Levine was certainly not qualified to nominate.it is curious that the nobelprize.org page changed the wording in 2007 from:
to this currently:
don't forget that this conversation centered around the non-nomination of limbaugh for the nobel peace prize
Pretty certain they did not change the "by invitation only" requirement.
It may have been due to just an attempt to make the Nobel site's web paragraph more concise.
actually it makes the website more ambiguous. maybe they are about to change the rules to the same as the literature prize, which would still leave levin out in the cold, as i still am not convinced that he is a professor.
to sum up, rush limbaugh was not nominated for the nobel peace prize. if i like it or not.
That we know of...I know. Of which Levine was certainly not qualified to nominate.
Pretty certain they did not change the "by invitation only" requirement.
It may have been due to just an attempt to make the Nobel site's web paragraph more concise.
actually it makes the website more ambiguous. maybe they are about to change the rules to the same as the literature prize, which would still leave levin out in the cold, as i still am not convinced that he is a professor.
to sum up, rush limbaugh was not nominated for the nobel peace prize. if i like it or not.
Indeed it is sir!That we know of...actually it makes the website more ambiguous. maybe they are about to change the rules to the same as the literature prize, which would still leave levin out in the cold, as i still am not convinced that he is a professor.
to sum up, rush limbaugh was not nominated for the nobel peace prize. if i like it or not.
fuck yes, again with my dishonest assumptions. ok, i will wait 50 years.
or qualify my statement thusly:
rush limbaugh was not nominated for the nobel peace prize by mark levin's Landmark Legal Foundation in 2007. there, that is airtight.
I know. Of which Levine was certainly not qualified to nominate.it is curious that the nobelprize.org page changed the wording in 2007 from:
to this currently:
don't forget that this conversation centered around the non-nomination of limbaugh for the nobel peace prize
Pretty certain they did not change the "by invitation only" requirement.
It may have been due to just an attempt to make the Nobel site's web paragraph more concise.
actually it makes the website more ambiguous. maybe they are about to change the rules to the same as the literature prize, which would still leave levin out in the cold, as i still am not convinced that he is a professor.
to sum up, rush limbaugh was not nominated for the nobel peace prize. if i like it or not.
I submit that for many critical thought not only doesn't matter, it is scornful.Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
That is true.Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
Mr. Fitnah, I'm Liberal and you can rightly go fuck yourself if you're going to paint with that wide brush of yours. Only the idiots are disagreeing with the facts, not Liberals.
Well thank you sir, I have never met a liberal who when it came down to the final analysis was doing such a precises impression of an idiot it was not possible to tell if it was an act or the real mccoy.Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
Mr. Fitnah, I'm Liberal and you can rightly go fuck yourself if you're going to paint with that wide brush of yours. Only the idiots are disagreeing with the facts, not Liberals.
Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
Mr. Fitnah, I'm Liberal and you can rightly go fuck yourself if you're going to paint with that wide brush of yours. Only the idiots are disagreeing with the facts, not Liberals.
Well You have to hand it to liberals once they have decided something , facts really don't matter.
Mr. Fitnah, I'm Liberal and you can rightly go fuck yourself if you're going to paint with that wide brush of yours. Only the idiots are disagreeing with the facts, not Liberals.
Well thank you sir, I have never met a liberal who when it came down to the final analysis was doing such a precises impression of an idiot it was not possible to tell if it was an act or the real mccoy.
So please elucidate for those playing along at home. Are you a real Idiot or are you just playing one?
Do you get this "upset" when anyone paints with a broad brush or just when a conservative does it?
You must be an idiot then.
Interesting... Usually the words "you can rightly go fuck yourself" tend to lead one to believe some sort of upset feelings from the person who typed it...Do you get this "upset" when anyone paints with a broad brush or just when a conservative does it?
I'm not upset first off.
Here's a little hint for whenever a broad brush is used that's served me well:Secondly, when someone insults me by trying to connect me with something I'm not I am not going to take it lying down.
naw, i do that with no feelings at allInteresting... Usually the words "you can rightly go fuck yourself" tend to lead one to believe some sort of upset feelings from the person who typed it...Do you get this "upset" when anyone paints with a broad brush or just when a conservative does it?
I'm not upset first off.
Here's a little hint for whenever a broad brush is used that's served me well:Secondly, when someone insults me by trying to connect me with something I'm not I am not going to take it lying down.
If it doesn't relate to you then it's not an insult to you.
He never said "all liberals" and had he done so then you could legitimately claim some sort of "faux-trage"... Broad brushes, although large, are not all encompassing...
You must be an idiot then.
Take it elsewhere hack.
Id say he is upset all the time, seeming to be unhinged or about to become unhinged at any moment.Interesting... Usually the words "you can rightly go fuck yourself" tend to lead one to believe some sort of upset feelings from the person who typed it...Do you get this "upset" when anyone paints with a broad brush or just when a conservative does it?
I'm not upset first off.
Here's a little hint for whenever a broad brush is used that's served me well:Secondly, when someone insults me by trying to connect me with something I'm not I am not going to take it lying down.
If it doesn't relate to you then it's not an insult to you.
He never said "all liberals" and had he done so then you could legitimately claim some sort of "faux-trage"... Broad brushes, although large, are not all encompassing...
