Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Could they not do it by exception ? When posts are reported ?It would be impossible to enforce; there are not enough mods to monitor every thread and every post.I cant see that it would be too difficult to enforce.Because there's no way for any message board to enforce such a policy.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
Besides, none of the conservative members would be able to participate if required to post only facts backed by evidence.
Fact is fact and opinion is opinion blurring the two allows the wicked to spread all manner of nonsense, much of which could be dangerous.
Hyperbolic nonsense.Partisans are liars.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
They distort and ignore and avoid and make up all kinds of things all the time.
Both ends. They have no credibility. And most certainly, not just on message boards.
.
They arent facts unless you can back them up.Don't know where those facts came from, just sort of popped out.
Oh, and they live in abject denial of their behaviors.Hyperbolic nonsense.Partisans are liars. They distort and ignore and avoid and make up all kinds of things all the time. Both ends. They have no credibility. And most certainly, not just on message boards..
All your lefty buddies that espouse global warming and Obama as a hero would not be able to post any more if all you allowed were facts.I cant see that it would be too difficult to enforce.Because there's no way for any message board to enforce such a policy.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
Besides, none of the conservative members would be able to participate if required to post only facts backed by evidence.
Fact is fact and opinion is opinion blurring the two allows the wicked to spread all manner of nonsense, much of which could be dangerous.
Awww, all that reporting you do not working out for you? Lol.Could they not do it by exception ? When posts are reported ?It would be impossible to enforce; there are not enough mods to monitor every thread and every post.I cant see that it would be too difficult to enforce.Because there's no way for any message board to enforce such a policy.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
Besides, none of the conservative members would be able to participate if required to post only facts backed by evidence.
Fact is fact and opinion is opinion blurring the two allows the wicked to spread all manner of nonsense, much of which could be dangerous.
It would be inconsistent with the theme.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
It's called US message board. The US stand for UNITED STATES. Here in the US, we have a thing called freedom of speech.
I can call you a whiny faggot, even though it is crude, rude, uncouth, and I know you are married.
I wouldn't, because generally I like to remain cordial and I like intelligent folks like yourself.
However, if you keep up with your agenda, and try to silence the opposition by placing unreasonable restraints on debate that are culturally inappropriate to the membership, someone just might call you a whiny faggot.
Everyone would "report" everyone else whether warranted or not, particularly on such a hyper-partisan forum; it's one of the many reasons why the old "neg" system was done away with.Could they not do it by exception ? When posts are reported ?It would be impossible to enforce; there are not enough mods to monitor every thread and every post.I cant see that it would be too difficult to enforce.Because there's no way for any message board to enforce such a policy.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
Besides, none of the conservative members would be able to participate if required to post only facts backed by evidence.
Fact is fact and opinion is opinion blurring the two allows the wicked to spread all manner of nonsense, much of which could be dangerous.
Not all issues people want to discuss are backed with reliable data, or even data, eedjit.They arent facts unless you can back them up.Don't know where those facts came from, just sort of popped out.
If you have access to the methodology, you can analyse it.Even research that is shown to be "fact" isn't analyzed to see if there are flaws in the study. For the cynical, they think it means no fact is ever true.
Many of your anti American trolling threads have no backed up facts, just your bigoted opinions presented as fact ie because you've 'visited the US and Russia' they are practically the same country. Lol.People on here post absolute rubbish as fact when there is nothing factual to back it up.
Why is that allowed ?
If you say, for example :
Unemployment has gone up in the last year.
Then you should be able to back it up with a link to some figures.
Why doesnt the message board insist on this ?
I think it would save a lot of time and possibly raise the standard of debate.
You can analyze it, but most people on forums don't.If you have access to the methodology, you can analyse it.Even research that is shown to be "fact" isn't analyzed to see if there are flaws in the study. For the cynical, they think it means no fact is ever true.
Even legitimate sources are rejected, often for the most spurious reasons, when the information is not wanted/agreed with. It sometimes seems pointless to go throught the effort of finding legitimate sources when they are so often dismissed out of hand.
