- Thread starter
- #21
someone needs to draw a line.
Marriage is socially acceptable.
Queerness is socially deviant.
Therefore, Queer Marriage is not socially acceptable.
QED.
Homosexuality is only socially unexceptiable to bigots....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
someone needs to draw a line.
Marriage is socially acceptable.
Queerness is socially deviant.
Therefore, Queer Marriage is not socially acceptable.
QED.
someone needs to draw a line.
Marriage is socially acceptable.
Queerness is socially deviant.
Therefore, Queer Marriage is not socially acceptable.
QED.
Homosexuality is only socially unexceptiable to bigots....
Poll is pointless as gays can already marry. No one is stopping them.
I had a tenant here in TN who had a "marriage certificate" with her girlfriend up in her apartment. They were married. I didn't see the police breaking down the door and arresting anyone.
Poll is pointless as gays can already marry. No one is stopping them.
I had a tenant here in TN who had a "marriage certificate" with her girlfriend up in her apartment. They were married. I didn't see the police breaking down the door and arresting anyone.
The point of the poll is in the second sentence of the OP...
gays have been getting married here in mass for six years now, and i've yet to have a piece of the sky hit me over the head.
y'all really need to get over it.
Sorry I simply do not think the Fed is suppose to have the power to dictate to the states on issues they were not given power over in the Constitution. That is why I favor the Amendment route.
With an Amendment we can clarify not only that Gays can Marry and all states have to recognize that. But we can insure that Gays victory is not then used to fight for Palimony rights or Incest rights for example. After all if you prove that People can marry each other despite sex, with out clarification. You have to know that that Polygamists at least will be next in line demanding equal protection.
Polygamists should be given equal protection...
Should NAMBLA?
someone needs to draw a line.
Marriage is socially acceptable.
Queerness is socially deviant.
Therefore, Queer Marriage is not socially acceptable.
QED.
Homosexuality is only socially unexceptiable to bigots....
gays have been getting married here in mass for six years now, and i've yet to have a piece of the sky hit me over the head.
y'all really need to get over it.
Massachusetts is so fucked up if you had men fornicating with sheep on the streets of Boston tying up traffic it wouldn't make the state worse.
Polygamists should be given equal protection...
Should NAMBLA?
why do that? a relationship between two consenting adults is not the same as victimization of minors.
Then it's even more pointless. "Are you for or against gay marriage" is like asking if you are for or against sunrise. Nothing stands in the way of sunrise. Nothing stands in the way of gay marriage.
Now, if you want to re-phrase that to read: Are you for or against the state according special rights to gays" you might have a worthwhile (and reality-based) poll.
gays have been getting married here in mass for six years now, and i've yet to have a piece of the sky hit me over the head.
y'all really need to get over it.
Should NAMBLA?
why do that? a relationship between two consenting adults is not the same as victimization of minors.
Cause they try to demonize Gay people by hinting that we are all child molestors. No one supports child molestors...ergo....
Polygamists should be given equal protection...