POLL: Do You Support Accepting Thousands Into The US From Dangerous Terror-Plagued Nations?

Do You Support Accepting Thousands Into The US From Dangerous Terror-Plagued Nations


  • Total voters
    67
  • Poll closed .

Dschrute3

Gold Member
Dec 10, 2016
15,572
1,871
290
Donald Trump has recently signed an Executive Order limiting Immigration from certain nations. The nations on the list are nations known to be dangerous Terrorism hotbeds. But some are opposed to the action. How will you vote on this? Share your thoughts.
 
You don't just accept them. You support them and give them free health care. What happens when the left wing forgets that they are in the U.S. and they decide to murder the infidels the way the San Bernadino terrorists did?
 
OP- Absolutely, after being vetted for at least 2 years- as THEY ALREADY WERE. You fear mongered bigots/dupes/a-holes never learn...

No upside for Americans. Why allow Thousands in from these very dangerous nations? It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best. This action should have been taken years ago. The #1 priority should be protecting Americans. But apparently, some of our leaders forgot that.
 
Last edited:
OP- Absolutely, after being vetted for at least 2 years- as THEY ALREADY WERE. You fear mongered bigots/dupes/a-holes never learn...

No upside for Americans. Why allow Thousands in from these very dangerous nations? It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best. This action should have been taken years ago. The #1 priority should be protecting Americans. But apparently, some of our leaders forgot about that.

We've been bringing in refugees from those countries for years now.
 
No, I am not in favor of thousands of immigrants from terrorist nations. On the other hand, I am not in favor of excluding qualified and vetted individuals being let in from those places. Which is EXACTLY what Trump's executive order allows.
 
I voted no, but if they were limited to those persecuted by Islam like the Christians and other religious minorities as Trump is actually wanting, then yes.

You couldn't find a more loyal American than those let in who are the real victims of Islam.
 
No, I am not in favor of thousands of immigrants from terrorist nations. On the other hand, I am not in favor of excluding qualified and vetted individuals being let in from those places. Which is EXACTLY what Trump's executive order allows.
His order does both.

As he said, he wants a temporary halt until the govt "can figure out what's going on".... that is, until they can come up with a method of halting the potential terrorists while letting the good guys through.

Liberals hate that kind of common sense, though, but they have no way of arguing against it. So they are trying to pretend Trump wants to halt both terrorists AND good guys permanently.

Is a liberal capable of making a post on this forum without telling a lie?
 
If Don the con was sincerely worried about stopping immigration from terrorist countries , he would ban Saudis and Pakistanis. But they weren't on that list.
 
crazy to let in any of these vetted or non vetted because you will eventually have to deal with their culture , traditions and ways of thinking . Go ahead though and you and your kids will pay the price .
 
Donald Trump has recently signed an Executive Order limiting Immigration from certain nations. The nations on the list are nations known to be dangerous Terrorism hotbeds. But some are opposed to the action. How will you vote on this? Share your thoughts.


The EO didn't even mention the seven nations by name. It's just a continuation of a policy that Obabble put in place in 2015 regarding those very same countries.
 
Donald Trump has recently signed an Executive Order limiting Immigration from certain nations. The nations on the list are nations known to be dangerous Terrorism hotbeds. But some are opposed to the action. How will you vote on this? Share your thoughts.

Endanger lives in order for the dem party to have just a few more votes?

NO!
 
Let's put put on our big-girl pantsuits and look at the issue. Those states mentioned do not or cannot work closely with the US in vetting their citizens. Sure, Pakis and Saudis breed terrorists like rabbits, but they haved worked with us since 9/11 with us. Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan and the like have no idea what's going on within their borders.
 
Let's put put on our big-girl pantsuits and look at the issue. Those states mentioned do not or cannot work closely with the US in vetting their citizens. Sure, Pakis and Saudis breed terrorists like rabbits, but they haved worked with us since 9/11 with us. Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan and the like have no idea what's going on within their borders.
----------------------------------------------------- thanks , I have heard it said that at least the nation not mentioned in Trumps orders at least have functioning governments .
 
and even with that observation , all these non western countries people should be on the list as staying where they belong .
 
OP- Absolutely, after being vetted for at least 2 years- as THEY ALREADY WERE. You fear mongered bigots/dupes/a-holes never learn...

No upside for Americans. Why allow Thousands in from these very dangerous nations? It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best. This action should have been taken years ago. The #1 priority should be protecting Americans. But apparently, some of our leaders forgot about that.

We've been bringing in refugees from those countries for years now.

"We've been bringing in refugees from those countries for years now."

That was pre-ISIS formation though, please darling get with the programme :smoke:
 
and just looking again the poll , it looks good . A couple of bonehead YES vote but I can probably name all of those boneheaded anti American voters . A moment ago it was 90.9 against letting savages into the USA so that's pretty good .
 

Forum List

Back
Top