Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Monk-Eye, Sep 8, 2018.
Yeah, that's from a long time ago. Americans need something more direct these days.
Oh. N_S is talking about economics. Hm. I'd disagree with him there, because it's not just the right.
Both parties are Keynesian. Both parties are the reason we have a patently socialist monetary policy. And neither want to end it because they both benefit from the welfare state that it creates.
I have a problem of what wrights are and can not really give a half ass response. Unless it is a typo.
I actually agree with you. I was throwing out bones to be fetched. I never was very diplomatic, but I try.
Yeah. As an afterthought, I kind of figured you did. Your postings are always really good, and I've always found them agreeable.
I can understand that there are rights, and liberty, I never gave much attention to the neg or pos descriptor to any of these. I don't think there are any negative rights tho.
I noticed the quote at the end of your post. It is interesting that the Rothschild are the ones who control the Federal reserve today.
" Not Too Complicated Political Science Terminology "
* Egregious Acts Against Apatheistic Analysis Of Creed *
My presumption would be that a negative right is minus 90 degrees of angle .
The term right alludes to perpendicular with the horizon , as in to right a ship , or to stand up right , that also alludes to a Norm (mathematics) - Wikipedia , and often to a plumb line of some length - a Gnomon - Wikipedia , from which a notion of Natural law - Wikipedia and Natural and legal rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) is asserted .
Now if one wishes to allude to natural rights as some idealistic conjecture , such is not a detriment to reason , while alluding to writs of law as legal wrights is a correct application of terminology , as to do otherwise is not only incorrect , but too often fools conjecture a rite to implement written law even while it asserts said laws to be equivalent with a conjectural right .
* Quotations From Link References *
Historically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from nature's or God's creation of reality and mankind.
Natural law (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a philosophy asserting that certain rights are inherent by virtue of human nature, endowed by nature—traditionally by God or a transcendent source—and that these can be understood universally through human reason. As determined by nature, the law of nature is implied to be objective and universal; it exists independently of human understanding, and of the positive law of a given state, political order, legislature or society at large.
Natural and legal rights are two types of rights. Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal and inalienable (they cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws). Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system (they can be modified, repealed, and restrained by human laws).
" Contentious Observation More Deeply Analyzed "
* Civics Courses Missing Informed Consent *
Another policy issue to which negative wrights , positive wrights , negative liberties and positive liberties can be applied is to same sex " marriage " .
An ability to enter into a civil union is a negative liberty inherent to self determination ( property ownership , willful intents ) of individualism , that should be equally protected .
Alternatively , equating monogamous , heterosexual , civil unions with some positive wright , otherwise termed a " marriage " , grants a positive liberty that may not be equally endowed .
Amicus Merit Brief on Same Sex Marriage to the Supreme Court of The United States
In America, there should be no "negative liberties".
Unfortunately, after 2001 there have been some, and there should not be.
Also that "Brady bill" thing, too.
Separate names with a comma.