Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Monk-Eye, Sep 8, 2018.

?

Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises

  1. Agree that " equal wrights " advocates should distinguish between negative and positive wrights .

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Agree that " equal wrights " advocates should distinguish between negative and positive liberties .

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. Agree that " negative liberty " should be " equally protected " .

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  4. Agree that " negative liberty " may not be " equally protected " .

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Agree that " positive liberty " should be " equally endowed " .

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Agree that " positive iberty " may not be " equally endowed " .

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Marion Morrison
    Offline

    Marion Morrison Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    37,993
    Thanks Received:
    6,451
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +38,084
    Yeah, that's from a long time ago. Americans need something more direct these days.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. Natural Citizen
    Offline

    Natural Citizen Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    5,324
    Thanks Received:
    1,121
    Trophy Points:
    365
    Ratings:
    +4,484
    Oh. N_S is talking about economics. Hm. I'd disagree with him there, because it's not just the right.

    Both parties are Keynesian. Both parties are the reason we have a patently socialist monetary policy. And neither want to end it because they both benefit from the welfare state that it creates.

    But whuheva...
     
  3. Dan Stubbs
    Offline

    Dan Stubbs FORGET ---- HELL Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,707
    Thanks Received:
    818
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Some where in the South.
    Ratings:
    +4,557
    I have a problem of what wrights are and can not really give a half ass response. Unless it is a typo.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  4. night_son
    Offline

    night_son Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    2,827
    Thanks Received:
    782
    Trophy Points:
    335
    Location:
    The Full Moon
    Ratings:
    +3,328
    I actually agree with you. I was throwing out bones to be fetched. I never was very diplomatic, but I try.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Natural Citizen
    Offline

    Natural Citizen Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    5,324
    Thanks Received:
    1,121
    Trophy Points:
    365
    Ratings:
    +4,484
    Yeah. As an afterthought, I kind of figured you did. Your postings are always really good, and I've always found them agreeable.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Dan Stubbs
    Offline

    Dan Stubbs FORGET ---- HELL Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,707
    Thanks Received:
    818
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Some where in the South.
    Ratings:
    +4,557
    I can understand that there are rights, and liberty, I never gave much attention to the neg or pos descriptor to any of these. I don't think there are any negative rights tho.
     
  7. Dan Stubbs
    Offline

    Dan Stubbs FORGET ---- HELL Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,707
    Thanks Received:
    818
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Some where in the South.
    Ratings:
    +4,557
    I noticed the quote at the end of your post. It is interesting that the Rothschild are the ones who control the Federal reserve today.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    484
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +98
    " Not Too Complicated Political Science Terminology "

    * Egregious Acts Against Apatheistic Analysis Of Creed *
    My presumption would be that a negative right is minus 90 degrees of angle .

    The term right alludes to perpendicular with the horizon , as in to right a ship , or to stand up right , that also alludes to a Norm (mathematics) - Wikipedia , and often to a plumb line of some length - a Gnomon - Wikipedia , from which a notion of Natural law - Wikipedia and Natural and legal rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) is asserted .

    Now if one wishes to allude to natural rights as some idealistic conjecture , such is not a detriment to reason , while alluding to writs of law as legal wrights is a correct application of terminology , as to do otherwise is not only incorrect , but too often fools conjecture a rite to implement written law even while it asserts said laws to be equivalent with a conjectural right .

    * Quotations From Link References *

    "
    Historically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from nature's or God's creation of reality and mankind.

    Natural law (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a philosophy asserting that certain rights are inherent by virtue of human nature, endowed by nature—traditionally by God or a transcendent source—and that these can be understood universally through human reason. As determined by nature, the law of nature is implied to be objective and universal;[1] it exists independently of human understanding, and of the positive law of a given state, political order, legislature or society at large.

    Natural and legal rights are two types of rights. Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal and inalienable (they cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws). Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system (they can be modified, repealed, and restrained by human laws).
    "
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2018
  9. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    484
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +98
    " Contentious Observation More Deeply Analyzed "

    * Civics Courses Missing Informed Consent *
    Another policy issue to which negative wrights , positive wrights , negative liberties and positive liberties can be applied is to same sex " marriage " .

    An ability to enter into a civil union is a negative liberty inherent to self determination ( property ownership , willful intents ) of individualism , that should be equally protected .

    Alternatively , equating monogamous , heterosexual , civil unions with some positive wright , otherwise termed a " marriage " , grants a positive liberty that may not be equally endowed .

    Amicus Merit Brief on Same Sex Marriage to the Supreme Court of The United States
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2018
  10. Marion Morrison
    Offline

    Marion Morrison Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    37,993
    Thanks Received:
    6,451
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +38,084
    In America, there should be no "negative liberties".

    Unfortunately, after 2001 there have been some, and there should not be.

    Also that "Brady bill" thing, too.
     

Share This Page