Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Monk-Eye, Sep 8, 2018.

?

Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises

  1. Agree that " equal wrights " advocates should distinguish between negative and positive wrights .

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Agree that " equal wrights " advocates should distinguish between negative and positive liberties .

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. Agree that " negative liberty " should be " equally protected " .

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  4. Agree that " negative liberty " may not be " equally protected " .

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Agree that " positive liberty " should be " equally endowed " .

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Agree that " positive iberty " may not be " equally endowed " .

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    332
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Ratings:
    +67
    " Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments "

    * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises *

    Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ?

    Does any agree or disagree that " equal protection " is congruent with negative liberty from government and established through negative wrights ; and that " equal protection " is congruent with negative liberty from other individuals , that is established through positive wrights ; and , that " negative liberties " are to be " equally protected " ?

    Does any agree or disagree that positive liberties are established through positive wrights and that " positive liberties " may not be " equally endowed " ?


    A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Marion Morrison
    Offline

    Marion Morrison Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    34,180
    Thanks Received:
    5,873
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +34,161
    Da Fuq is this? "Equal wrights"? Ask me how I know you're not from the west. :)
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  3. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    332
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Ratings:
    +67
    " Big Smiles "

    * Waging On Ward *

    Which direction is east or west relative with your geographic location , assuming you mean nearer in proximity ? :)

    My proclivity to apply the term " wright " in neologism as a syllogism for the actual meaning intended by language when alluding to liberties established through written law by law wrights is well founded in Legal positivism - Wikipedia .
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Marion Morrison
    Offline

    Marion Morrison Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    34,180
    Thanks Received:
    5,873
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +34,161
    No.

    :no_text11:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  5. night_son
    Offline

    night_son Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    2,778
    Thanks Received:
    762
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The Full Moon
    Ratings:
    +3,235
    Thanks. Yes I agree.

    The radical American Left--and to be fair, to a lesser degree, the American Right--applies Game Theory philosophies to equal rights and protections laws currently, and also has for many decades, in the form of treating such attempts at legislating and adjudicating civil rights and liberties equilibriums as zero sum games with one winner, and thusly, accordingly one loser. Unfortunately, when the intended winners are minorities made the victor by special protection rules, the loser--who must have some freedom removed in order to accommodate the applied zero sum political theory-- can only be everyone else. Nice nod to our neologism defined modern civilization, thanks.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    332
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Ratings:
    +67
    " Articulating A New Standard In Schema "

    * Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *

    A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .

    Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .

    Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .

    The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .

    A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .

    Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. night_son
    Offline

    night_son Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    2,778
    Thanks Received:
    762
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The Full Moon
    Ratings:
    +3,235
    We're also getting into a dangerous or slippery slope realm here of Perspectivism social and cultural philosophy. What is a positive (w) right for one social segment strata, can be and often is experienced by another as a negative one. Balancing acts require hierarchies; social hierarchies are most often unbalanced by Party hedonism, anti-empathetic economic philosophies, and politicized identity groups. Lenin had class warfare derived from Marx and Engels; after it failed, his protégé just relocated the entire demographic, starved or murdered it. Today, the American Left has slow burn race warfare, postmodern intelligentsia; while the Right has trickle down water elevators ever in need of repair, and reactionary politicking and economic theory which reacts often far too slowly.
     
  8. Marion Morrison
    Offline

    Marion Morrison Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    34,180
    Thanks Received:
    5,873
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +34,161
    It seems like you two are brothers from a different mother.

    Yet I have to ask..wtf is a "trickle down water elevator"?
     
  9. Natural Citizen
    Offline

    Natural Citizen Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    4,691
    Thanks Received:
    962
    Trophy Points:
    345
    Ratings:
    +3,915
    An example would be that the Civil Rights Act got rid of the Jim Crow laws, but it also put a stake through property rights. That's just an off the top of my head example.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. night_son
    Offline

    night_son Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    2,778
    Thanks Received:
    762
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The Full Moon
    Ratings:
    +3,235
    Trickle down economics; tricking down to fill up our pockets and give us a ride on up? Make some sense, Duke?
     

Share This Page