Anguille
Bane of the Urbane
- Mar 8, 2008
- 17,910
- 2,266
- 48
But you do get to discuss it here?Now I have been ordered to quit trolling.
Bfn folks.
You got a problem with it, take it to PM. You don't get to discuss it here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you do get to discuss it here?Now I have been ordered to quit trolling.
Bfn folks.
You got a problem with it, take it to PM. You don't get to discuss it here.
I wouldn't count on that out in Idaho.Second, in regards to Arkangel's post, I agree, the woman should simply have gone to another pharmacist. My guess is that there was another pharmacist in the very store she was in. If not, there was most likely another pharmacy within five miles.
Hi. I'm new to posting here, though I've lurked a bit. I didn't start a thread to introduce myself, because I always feel like that's saying 'come say hi to me'. To me, and for myself, anyway.
As to this thread, there are reasons for uterine bleeding beyond abortion and beyond IUDs. Several years ago, my period didn't stop. Every evening it would seem like it was going to, and every morning it would start up again. When this was going on into the 3rd week, I went to the Dr. Their explanation was that my body just sort of 'forgot' to turn it off, and prescribed medication to stop it. I'm glad I didn't run into a pharmacist who would take it upon herself to decide the reason I needed to stop uterine bleeding and refuse to give me the medication.
Thoughts USMB?If a health care professional invokes a conscience right in a life-threatening situation where no other health care professional capable of treating the emergency is available, such health care professional shall provide treatment and care until an alternate health care professional capable of treating the emergency is found.
Pharmacist Denies Anti-Bleeding Medication Because Woman Might Have Had an Abortion | Women's Rights | Change.org
A pharmacist at a Nampa, Idaho, Walgreens refused to dispense medication that stops uterine bleeding because she suspected the woman may have had an abortion. The pharmacist invoked the state's new so-called conscience clause that allows pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraceptives and abortifacient drugs, among other things, if they have a personal problem with it.Original article:Last November, a woman took her prescription for Methergine, a drug that stops uterine bleeding regardless of cause, to Walgreens. The pharmacist, suspicious that the woman's uncontrolled bleeding may have been the result of an abortion, called the nurse practitioner who wrote the prescription to inquire why the patient needed it. When the nurse refused to answer because to do so would violate the patient's confidentiality, the pharmacist hung up on her and refused to fill the prescription.
Essentially, the pharmacist was saying that, while her conscience was just dandy with letting a woman bleed out, it would have a problem saving her life if it was even a possibility that the blood loss was connected to an abortion. The pharmacist's conscience being so fickle, apparently also prevented her from even referring the woman to a pharmacy who would fill her prescription, leaving her alone, bleeding, and lost. Someone care to explain to me how this qualifies as pro-life?
Complaint targets Nampa pharmacist - Idaho Press-Tribune: News
Let's go over a couple things real quick.
1.) She already had the abortion if she wants this medication (if she did have the abortion).
Remember:
So this has nothing to do with saving a fetus or a couple cells. In this case, this is about punishing someone for what the pharmacist considered wrong.
2.) The same law that the Pharmacist used to not fill the prescription may be the same law that the pharmacist broke.
Let's recall, shall we? Original article:
The law itself:The nurse alleged that the pharmacist hung up when asked for a referral to another pharmacy that would fill the prescription.
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2010/S1353.pdf
Thoughts USMB?If a health care professional invokes a conscience right in a life-threatening situation where no other health care professional capable of treating the emergency is available, such health care professional shall provide treatment and care until an alternate health care professional capable of treating the emergency is found.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?Pharmacist Denies Anti-Bleeding Medication Because Woman Might Have Had an Abortion | Women's Rights | Change.org
Original article:A pharmacist at a Nampa, Idaho, Walgreens refused to dispense medication that stops uterine bleeding because she suspected the woman may have had an abortion. The pharmacist invoked the state's new so-called conscience clause that allows pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraceptives and abortifacient drugs, among other things, if they have a personal problem with it.
Complaint targets Nampa pharmacist - Idaho Press-Tribune: News
All I can say is bullshit. There is no way a pharmacist would say something like that is if they were both crazy and negligent, and that does not happen in the real world. The woman is making it all up in an attempt to extort money from Walgreen's.
Let's go over a couple things real quick.
1.) She already had the abortion if she wants this medication (if she did have the abortion).
Remember:
So this has nothing to do with saving a fetus or a couple cells. In this case, this is about punishing someone for what the pharmacist considered wrong.
2.) The same law that the Pharmacist used to not fill the prescription may be the same law that the pharmacist broke.
Let's recall, shall we? Original article:
The law itself:
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2010/S1353.pdf
Thoughts USMB?If a health care professional invokes a conscience right in a life-threatening situation where no other health care professional capable of treating the emergency is available, such health care professional shall provide treatment and care until an alternate health care professional capable of treating the emergency is found.
My thought is that some people will believe the dumbest bullshit simply because it fits into their worldview that Christians are ignorant bigots who hate everyone. Other than that, nothing else makes any sense in this whole story.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?
“Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest public affairs staff has since contacted Walgreens’ corporate office, and corrective action was taken with the Nampa pharmacist,” Kristen Glundberg-Prossor, Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest’s director of public affairs, said.
In a free country, a person is free to sell or not sell something as they see fit.
Don't get the product you want? Too bad, go somewhere else.
Like a firearm, pinko's want to restrict the sale of those constantly. Ya know, baby haters really hate the concept of self defense, after all if the almighty government determines you should die then the parasite pinko will preach to marx almighty on how such and such self defense must be forbidden from sale.
But step in the way of baby butchering, then the pinko comes out in full force hypocrisy.
Granted the woman could on some slim chance have been duped by pinko propaganda into killing her own baby (at a nice tidy profit for the pinko)...
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?
All I can say is bullshit. There is no way a pharmacist would say something like that is if they were both crazy and negligent, and that does not happen in the real world. The woman is making it all up in an attempt to extort money from Walgreen's.
Let's go over a couple things real quick.
1.) She already had the abortion if she wants this medication (if she did have the abortion).
Remember:
So this has nothing to do with saving a fetus or a couple cells. In this case, this is about punishing someone for what the pharmacist considered wrong.
2.) The same law that the Pharmacist used to not fill the prescription may be the same law that the pharmacist broke.
Let's recall, shall we? Original article:
The law itself:
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2010/S1353.pdf
Thoughts USMB?
My thought is that some people will believe the dumbest bullshit simply because it fits into their worldview that Christians are ignorant bigots who hate everyone. Other than that, nothing else makes any sense in this whole story.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?
All I can say is bullshit. There is no way a pharmacist would say something like that is if they were both crazy and negligent, and that does not happen in the real world. The woman is making it all up in an attempt to extort money from Walgreen's.
Let's go over a couple things real quick.
1.) She already had the abortion if she wants this medication (if she did have the abortion).
Remember:
So this has nothing to do with saving a fetus or a couple cells. In this case, this is about punishing someone for what the pharmacist considered wrong.
2.) The same law that the Pharmacist used to not fill the prescription may be the same law that the pharmacist broke.
Let's recall, shall we? Original article:
The law itself:
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2010/S1353.pdf
Thoughts USMB?
My thought is that some people will believe the dumbest bullshit simply because it fits into their worldview that Christians are ignorant bigots who hate everyone. Other than that, nothing else makes any sense in this whole story.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?
All I can say is bullshit. There is no way a pharmacist would say something like that is if they were both crazy and negligent, and that does not happen in the real world. The woman is making it all up in an attempt to extort money from Walgreen's.
Let's go over a couple things real quick.
1.) She already had the abortion if she wants this medication (if she did have the abortion).
Remember:
So this has nothing to do with saving a fetus or a couple cells. In this case, this is about punishing someone for what the pharmacist considered wrong.
2.) The same law that the Pharmacist used to not fill the prescription may be the same law that the pharmacist broke.
Let's recall, shall we? Original article:
The law itself:
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2010/S1353.pdf
Thoughts USMB?
My thought is that some people will believe the dumbest bullshit simply because it fits into their worldview that Christians are ignorant bigots who hate everyone. Other than that, nothing else makes any sense in this whole story.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?
Of course not.
Never mind the fact this was in the original article:
Also, there's the fact that this woman's religion never came into question in the original post if I remember reading correctly. All that was mentioned was she denied the woman her medication due to her beliefs.Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest public affairs staff has since contacted Walgreens corporate office, and corrective action was taken with the Nampa pharmacist, Kristen Glundberg-Prossor, Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwests director of public affairs, said.
um, do you have any proof the woman is making it up?All I can say is bullshit. There is no way a pharmacist would say something like that is if they were both crazy and negligent, and that does not happen in the real world. The woman is making it all up in an attempt to extort money from Walgreen's.
My thought is that some people will believe the dumbest bullshit simply because it fits into their worldview that Christians are ignorant bigots who hate everyone. Other than that, nothing else makes any sense in this whole story.
typical CHRISTIAN SPIN
they dont believe everything they read unless it suits there voodoo beliefs
*the bible *
yes the story *could *have been made up very possible
things have been made up before to suit a perticular mantra .
example the bible .
christians dont think like that thou ,funny how if it goes against thier religious dogma they want PROVE ITS FACT .
Dont want to give us proof about the man in the sky thou
we are just supposed to take their word for it .