Perry says he doesn't believe in global warming

You mean there are actually people out there in the 21st century that don't think Man Made Global Warming is real? LOL. Seriously?!? Hahahahaahahahahah.
Sooooo... To you, the Information Age is just something that happened to other people?

You should go to the Phrenologist and get the bumps on your head checked out. I think one's recent. Oh, and take your perpetual motion machine powered autovoiture.
 
You mean there are actually people out there in the 21st century that don't think Man Made Global Warming is real? LOL. Seriously?!? Hahahahaahahahahah.
Sooooo... To you, the Information Age is just something that happened to other people?

You should go to the Phrenologist and get the bumps on your head checked out. I think one's recent. Oh, and take your perpetual motion machine powered autovoiture.

Awesome.

I wonder about RDD sometimes... he's quite the like minded robot. Not a very inquisitive fellow.
 
“We’re not going to win a national election if we become the anti-science party,” John Weaver, Jon Huntsman’s chief strategist, said in an interview Wednesday. “The American people are looking for someone who lives in reality and is a truth teller because that’s the only way that the significant problems this country faces can be solved. It appears that the only science that Mitt Romney believes in is the science of polling, and that science clearly was not a mandatory course for Governor Perry.”

John Weaver scolds Rick Perry on global warming - Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com
 
OH MY GOD!.......Perry pissed off the enviro-loons.

Good!......Who fuckin' cares?

Hopefully we'll get to see Algore have another meltdown after his cash cow of a fraud has yet again been attacked.

'cause watchin' that lunatic become unhinged is must see TV indeed!
 
“We’re not going to win a national election if we become the anti-science party,” John Weaver, Jon Huntsman’s chief strategist, said in an interview Wednesday. “The American people are looking for someone who lives in reality and is a truth teller because that’s the only way that the significant problems this country faces can be solved. It appears that the only science that Mitt Romney believes in is the science of polling, and that science clearly was not a mandatory course for Governor Perry.”

John Weaver scolds Rick Perry on global warming - Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com

Well said, and the very reason I will vote for Ron Paul.
 
“We’re not going to win a national election if we become the anti-science party,” John Weaver, Jon Huntsman’s chief strategist, said in an interview Wednesday. “The American people are looking for someone who lives in reality and is a truth teller because that’s the only way that the significant problems this country faces can be solved. It appears that the only science that Mitt Romney believes in is the science of polling, and that science clearly was not a mandatory course for Governor Perry.”

John Weaver scolds Rick Perry on global warming - Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com

Well said, and the very reason I will vote for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is in favor of things like the Kyoto Treaty? Who knew?

Frankly I didnt think 15 year olds could vote in this country.
 
OH MY GOD!.......Perry pissed off the enviro-loons.

Good!......Who fuckin' cares?

Hopefully we'll get to see Algore have another meltdown after his cash cow of a fraud has yet again been attacked.

'cause watchin' that lunatic become unhinged is must see TV indeed!
Of course he did. It threatens their entire industry of wasting government money on fraud and self destruction.
 
This has nothing to do with the economy or jobs.

Unless you are talking about dumping more money into the green money pit, this is an utterly useless subject for the upcoming elections.

It has everything to do with the economy and jobs.


The Chinese government spent $34.6 billion last year to propel its low-carbon economy, more than any other nation and almost double what the U.S. invested. The country is now headquarters for six of the biggest renewable energy employers—up from three in 2008—according to Clean Tech Job Trends 2009.
China winning race for green jobs

Donald Gilligan, president of the National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO), cited estimates that improvements in energy efficiency alone have met over 50 percent of the increase in U.S. energy demand since 1980. Much of this improvement has resulted from mandates and guidance provided by Congress and by state and federal agencies, including funding for technological innovation programs and the adoption of new rules promoting performance-based energy service contracting, appliance and equipment standards, and revised building codes.

These government directives, together with direct investments by private-sector energy providers, have supported the growth in both energy-efficiency resources and green jobs in the United States. In a recent survey, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimated that energy service companies provide about $4 billion in annual energy-efficiency investment nationwide, 25 to 30 percent of which is spent on labor to design, install, operate, and maintain comprehensive energy-efficiency projects in a wide range of building sectors.

Policymakers Recognize Value of “Green” Job Creation

China?

so should we respond like china?

If so, the only way to do that is to become a form of centralised tryanny where we lose most of our rights.

Really? That's what you got out of the post, that we should be a Communist country?

:rolleyes:
 
Warmers are idiots....

America isn't buying the bullshit anymore...

While the number may have dropped, a majority still trust the scientists...who, by the way, in an overwhelming majority, fall on the side of man made global warming being a reality.

bpg-iae_6umqs7-fda8tjq.gif
 
Warmers are idiots....

America isn't buying the bullshit anymore...

While the number may have dropped, a majority still trust the scientists...who, by the way, in an overwhelming majority, fall on the side of man made global warming being a reality.

bpg-iae_6umqs7-fda8tjq.gif

Hey stupid, the question isn't whether people think the earth is warming, it's if the cause is man-made.

Which only about a third of Americans believe it is.

1836-1.gif


Pew Research Center.
 
Let's pretend for a minute that the overwhelming majority of scientists are wrong and man made pollution isn't contributing much to our climate change. What's the worst that can come from believing them right? Cleaner air and water? Ending our dependence on foreign oil? Actually having a manufacturing base in this country?

Whether or not you believe climate change is real, the demand for cleaner/greener energy IS real. People want electric cars, more hybrids, solar charging stations, biofuel vehicles, hydrogen and wind power, etc. These are products that people BUY (and we don't fucking MAKE).
 
There is not enough scientific evidence to call global warming a "theory".

It is just an "opinion" of some scientists.

Rick Perry is just giving his personal opinion.

His opinion is just as valid as their opinion.

Uhhhh.....this is more than "just an "opinion" of some scientists".

Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists surveyed believe “global average temperatures have increased” during the past century.

Eighty-four percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring, and 74% agree that “currently available scientific evidence” substantiates its occurrence. Only 5% believe that that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure.

STATS:

And what are Perry's credentials to say that the vast majority of SCIENTISTS are wrong? Does he have some sort of expertise in this area that he's keeping secret? :confused:

.

From your link:

The 2007 study was conducted by mail within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of Statistical Assessment Service between March 19 and May 28, 2007 among 489 professional scientists who were either a member of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) or the American Geophysical Union (AGU). Weighting was done to correct for the fact that a respondent with dual membership in the organizations had a greater chance of being included in the sample.

All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with non-response, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words “margin of error” as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.

So it's an old survey done before the revelations of climate data manipulation. It's also a limited sample, so limited that it had to print a disclosure.

Also from the link:

Former Vice President Al Gore’s documentary film “An Inconvenient Truth” rates better than any traditional news source, with 26% finding it “very reliable” and 38% as somewhat reliable.

There's obviously some bias here if 64% of the scientists polled view Gore's film that way.
 
Warmers are idiots....

America isn't buying the bullshit anymore...

While the number may have dropped, a majority still trust the scientists...who, by the way, in an overwhelming majority, fall on the side of man made global warming being a reality.

bpg-iae_6umqs7-fda8tjq.gif

Hey stupid, the question isn't whether people think the earth is warming, it's if the cause is man-made.

Which only about a third of Americans believe it is.

1836-1.gif


Pew Research Center.

Hey asshole, (I am not sure why we are name calling, but that seems to be the way you roll), a majority of Americans STILL feel that man contributes to global climate change...despite the Koch brothers and Oil man Perry's efforts to dissuade them of the FACT.

eohew4a1qea0_ozknzhtyg.gif


Ya gotta wonder, of the people that don't believe humans contribute to climate change, how many are Faux viewers listening to Hannity talk about how cold it is in the winter. :rolleyes:
 
Let's pretend for a minute that the overwhelming majority of scientists are wrong and man made pollution isn't contributing much to our climate change. What's the worst that can come from believing them right? Cleaner air and water? Ending our dependence on foreign oil? Actually having a manufacturing base in this country?

Whether or not you believe climate change is real, the demand for cleaner/greener energy IS real. People want electric cars, more hybrids, solar charging stations, biofuel vehicles, hydrogen and wind power, etc. These are products that people BUY (and we don't fucking MAKE).

How about: the cost of all those "alt" energy sources is far greater than what we have now. Therefore adopting them as mandatory would effectively be an enormous tax hike on people, especially the working class people the Left claims to represent.
If alt energy were so wonderful we wouldn't need gov't mandates telling us to use it.
 
While the number may have dropped, a majority still trust the scientists...who, by the way, in an overwhelming majority, fall on the side of man made global warming being a reality.

bpg-iae_6umqs7-fda8tjq.gif

Hey stupid, the question isn't whether people think the earth is warming, it's if the cause is man-made.

Which only about a third of Americans believe it is.

1836-1.gif


Pew Research Center.

Hey asshole, (I am not sure why we are name calling, but that seems to be the way you roll), a majority of Americans STILL feel that man contributes to global climate change...despite the Koch brothers and Oil man Perry's efforts to dissuade them of the FACT.

eohew4a1qea0_ozknzhtyg.gif


Ya gotta wonder, of the people that don't believe humans contribute to climate change, how many are Faux viewers listening to Hannity talk about how cold it is in the winter. :rolleyes:

Not according to the latest Rasmussen and Pew Research polls.

69% Say It’s Likely Scientists Have Falsified Global Warming Research


According to Rasmussen Reports, those believing man can actually control the planet's thermostat have plummeted in number:

Just one-out-of-three voters (34%) now believe global warming is caused by human activity, the lowest finding yet in Rasmussen Reports national surveying. However, a plurality (48%) of the Political Class believes humans are to blame.

Forty-eight percent (48%) of all likely voters attribute climate change to long-term planetary trends, while seven percent (7%) blame some other reason. Eleven percent (11%) aren’t sure.

These numbers reflect a reversal from a year ago when 47% blamed human activity while 34% said long-term planetary trends.
 
Hey stupid, the question isn't whether people think the earth is warming, it's if the cause is man-made.

Which only about a third of Americans believe it is.

1836-1.gif


Pew Research Center.

Hey asshole, (I am not sure why we are name calling, but that seems to be the way you roll), a majority of Americans STILL feel that man contributes to global climate change...despite the Koch brothers and Oil man Perry's efforts to dissuade them of the FACT.

eohew4a1qea0_ozknzhtyg.gif


Ya gotta wonder, of the people that don't believe humans contribute to climate change, how many are Faux viewers listening to Hannity talk about how cold it is in the winter. :rolleyes:

Not according to the latest Rasmussen and Pew Research polls.

69% Say It’s Likely Scientists Have Falsified Global Warming Research


According to Rasmussen Reports, those believing man can actually control the planet's thermostat have plummeted in number:

Just one-out-of-three voters (34%) now believe global warming is caused by human activity, the lowest finding yet in Rasmussen Reports national surveying. However, a plurality (48%) of the Political Class believes humans are to blame.

Forty-eight percent (48%) of all likely voters attribute climate change to long-term planetary trends, while seven percent (7%) blame some other reason. Eleven percent (11%) aren’t sure.

These numbers reflect a reversal from a year ago when 47% blamed human activity while 34% said long-term planetary trends.

It is nice to see the man made global warming fearmongering is losing its effectiveness.

When the loudest sky is falling shouter, Al Gore, is probably among the world's top .001% of humans in terms of energy wasting, you know you smell a rat.
 
According to Rasmussen Reports, those believing man can actually control the planet's thermostat have plummeted in number:

Just one-out-of-three voters (34%) now believe global warming is caused by human activity, the lowest finding yet in Rasmussen Reports national surveying. However, a plurality (48%) of the Political Class believes humans are to blame.

Forty-eight percent (48%) of all likely voters attribute climate change to long-term planetary trends, while seven percent (7%) blame some other reason. Eleven percent (11%) aren’t sure.

These numbers reflect a reversal from a year ago when 47% blamed human activity while 34% said long-term planetary trends.

I'm pretty sure Rasmussen DOES poll more Faux viewers than any other. We know how informed those Faux viewers are...
 
Let's pretend for a minute that the overwhelming majority of scientists are wrong and man made pollution isn't contributing much to our climate change. What's the worst that can come from believing them right? Cleaner air and water? Ending our dependence on foreign oil? Actually having a manufacturing base in this country?

Whether or not you believe climate change is real, the demand for cleaner/greener energy IS real. People want electric cars, more hybrids, solar charging stations, biofuel vehicles, hydrogen and wind power, etc. These are products that people BUY (and we don't fucking MAKE).

How about: the cost of all those "alt" energy sources is far greater than what we have now. Therefore adopting them as mandatory would effectively be an enormous tax hike on people, especially the working class people the Left claims to represent.
If alt energy were so wonderful we wouldn't need gov't mandates telling us to use it.

But, like your beloved Trickle Down tried to do, wouldn't it also create more jobs and increase tax revenue? And once it becomes more established we will have created an entire new industry, added lots of jobs, increased tax revenue, reduced our dependance on foreign oil and made our nation cleaner for future generations.

Not bad, eh?

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top