Palestinian Authority Makes New Threats. "We'll Hijack Your Planes."

Weatherman2020, et al,

I am not following you here. How does this prove anything.

The PA warns the world they will encourage Arabs to hijack planes if demands are not met and the world is not more sympathetic to their plight. It's time to put the foot down.

PA Official Threatens: If World Not Sympathetic to Arab Cause, Arabs Will Hijack More Planes, Cut off Oil Supply

Senior Palestinian official and former peace negotiator Nabil Shaath said in an recent interview that if the Western world does not pay attention to the Arab cause, it risks more plane hijackings and global economic crises emanating from the Middle East.

In the interview, translated and released by MEMRI, Shaath slammed efforts to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and had special criticism for the American role in peace negotiations, saying, “Anything is better than American control of the negotiations. Anything. The US has never been a reliable honest broker. Never.”

He added that the US was “the strategic ally of Israel. Period.”

He said that the PA wanted an alternative negotiating strategy, referencing PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s call for talks “similar to the P5+1 framework”, which negotiated the recently-implemented Iran nuclear deal.


Read more at PA Official: Do We Have to Hijack Your Planes Again? - Israel News
Simply proves the Jews don't deserve a nation. :uhoh3:
(COMMENT)

How is it that making peace with Israel is a bad thing?

• "Shaath slammed efforts to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority"

Actually it is part of the UN Charter and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations, that directly infers that Palestinians shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state; including Israel.​

How does this prove that the Jews "don't deserve a nation?"

• The UN Charter stipulates that ALL peoples have the "equal rights and self-determination."​

The international law says that "All peoples have the right of self-determination;" that would include the Jewish people in Israel.​

How does a Senior Palestinian official and former peace negotiator (Nabil Shaath), implying the threat of terrorism (ie hijacking planes), prove that Israel does not deserve a nation? The UN Securiety Council declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.​

I don't think that the US has ever denied the contention that it is an advocate and ally of the State of Israel. Having said that, how does a peaceful relation with a Super Power prove that "the Jews don't deserve a state?"

• In Article one of the UN Charter, binds members "to develop friendly relations among nations."

While the US has no interest in the undeveloped relations, or constantly assailed relations it might have with any Regional Nation within the Middle East, it has no bearing on the worthiness of Israel to be a State.​

Yes, I'm having a hard time following the logic. But then again, it was the Arab Nations that established the Khartoum resolution:

• No peace with Israel,
• No recognition of Israel, and
• No negotiations with Israel.


Most Respectfully,
R
It was sarcasm. Israel is a Democracy with Muslims in its government AND Muslims in its military. One Jew living next door to a Palestinian is justification Palestinians slit the throats of children. Palestinians are evil scum not fit to live on earth.
You're a good little nazi

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
 
Weatherman2020, et al,

I am not following you here. How does this prove anything.

Simply proves the Jews don't deserve a nation. :uhoh3:
(COMMENT)

How is it that making peace with Israel is a bad thing?

• "Shaath slammed efforts to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority"

Actually it is part of the UN Charter and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations, that directly infers that Palestinians shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state; including Israel.​

How does this prove that the Jews "don't deserve a nation?"

• The UN Charter stipulates that ALL peoples have the "equal rights and self-determination."​

The international law says that "All peoples have the right of self-determination;" that would include the Jewish people in Israel.​

How does a Senior Palestinian official and former peace negotiator (Nabil Shaath), implying the threat of terrorism (ie hijacking planes), prove that Israel does not deserve a nation? The UN Securiety Council declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.​

I don't think that the US has ever denied the contention that it is an advocate and ally of the State of Israel. Having said that, how does a peaceful relation with a Super Power prove that "the Jews don't deserve a state?"

• In Article one of the UN Charter, binds members "to develop friendly relations among nations."

While the US has no interest in the undeveloped relations, or constantly assailed relations it might have with any Regional Nation within the Middle East, it has no bearing on the worthiness of Israel to be a State.​

Yes, I'm having a hard time following the logic. But then again, it was the Arab Nations that established the Khartoum resolution:

• No peace with Israel,
• No recognition of Israel, and
• No negotiations with Israel.


Most Respectfully,
R
It was sarcasm. Israel is a Democracy with Muslims in its government AND Muslims in its military. One Jew living next door to a Palestinian is justification Palestinians slit the throats of children. Palestinians are evil scum not fit to live on earth.
You're a good little nazi

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
 
Weatherman2020, et al,

I am not following you here. How does this prove anything.

(COMMENT)

How is it that making peace with Israel is a bad thing?

• "Shaath slammed efforts to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority"

Actually it is part of the UN Charter and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations, that directly infers that Palestinians shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state; including Israel.​

How does this prove that the Jews "don't deserve a nation?"

• The UN Charter stipulates that ALL peoples have the "equal rights and self-determination."​

The international law says that "All peoples have the right of self-determination;" that would include the Jewish people in Israel.​

How does a Senior Palestinian official and former peace negotiator (Nabil Shaath), implying the threat of terrorism (ie hijacking planes), prove that Israel does not deserve a nation? The UN Securiety Council declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.​

I don't think that the US has ever denied the contention that it is an advocate and ally of the State of Israel. Having said that, how does a peaceful relation with a Super Power prove that "the Jews don't deserve a state?"

• In Article one of the UN Charter, binds members "to develop friendly relations among nations."

While the US has no interest in the undeveloped relations, or constantly assailed relations it might have with any Regional Nation within the Middle East, it has no bearing on the worthiness of Israel to be a State.​

Yes, I'm having a hard time following the logic. But then again, it was the Arab Nations that established the Khartoum resolution:

• No peace with Israel,
• No recognition of Israel, and
• No negotiations with Israel.


Most Respectfully,
R
It was sarcasm. Israel is a Democracy with Muslims in its government AND Muslims in its military. One Jew living next door to a Palestinian is justification Palestinians slit the throats of children. Palestinians are evil scum not fit to live on earth.
You're a good little nazi

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did and you are now, just about a different group
 
It was sarcasm. Israel is a Democracy with Muslims in its government AND Muslims in its military. One Jew living next door to a Palestinian is justification Palestinians slit the throats of children. Palestinians are evil scum not fit to live on earth.
You're a good little nazi

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
 
You're a good little nazi

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
 
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches. - Goodwin
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
 
what would you say of someone that said
"One Christian living next door to a Jew is justification Jews slit the throats of children. Jews are evil scum not fit to live on earth."

Goodwin's great and all, but sometimes the shoe fits
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
what real government? what military?

they want their own state.

and you can't get away from your own nazi words
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

I agree, 100%.

[
The UN Charter stipulates that ALL peoples have the "equal rights and self-determination."​

Have you heard the legal expression "Your right to swing your fist stops at the end of my nose?"

Everybody has rights, but nobody has the "right" to violate the rights of others.
(COMMENT)

Thus the Arab Palestinian right to swing ends at asymmetric warfare.

No one denied the Arab Palestinians any rights. They just have never exercised them at the optimum time. And remember, the Arab Palestinian has no right to obstruct the Israel Right to Self-determination.

The title and rights to the territory went to the Allied Powers.
The Allied Powers set the conditions for immigration and the establishment of a Jewish National Home.
The Arabs did not like it.
The Arabs began a low intensity conflict.
The Jewish exercised their right to self-determination and declared independence.
The Arab low intensity conflict blossomed into a greater war support by the Arab League to achieve what they could not political acquire.
The Israeli's defeat the Arab contingent.
The Arab Palestinians refuse to make peace.
TheArabs periodically instigate conflict and blame it on the Israeli's​

There it is.

Most Respectfully,
R
The title and rights to the territory went to the Allied Powers.​

That is a lie. The Allied Powers held the territory in trust for the inhabitants.

The rest of your post is a crock of shit based on your false premise.
 
what real government? what military? they want their own state. and you can't get away from your own nazi words

You're new here, and don't seem particularly intelligent so I'll keep it simple for you - the arab muslims are the most intolerant trash on earth; they do not accept the sovereignty of anyone but them, and have been ethnically cleansing all minorities out of the mideast for 14 centuries. islam is a supremist death cult that does not tolerate the equal rights of others, and the fakestinians (an artificially manufactured people by the KGB) have been trying to slaughter the jews there for over 100 years.

THIS IS NOT A LAND ISSUE, and it never has been.

Got it, chimp?
 
Except no group is saying such a thing.
Anymore strawman toys in your bag?
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
what real government? what military?

they want their own state.

and you can't get away from your own nazi words
You ask what government? Is it true? Is ignorance truely bliss?

http://www.ips-dc.org/hamas_wins_the_palestinian_elections/
 
what real government? what military? they want their own state. and you can't get away from your own nazi words

You're new here, and don't seem particularly intelligent so I'll keep it simple for you - the arab muslims are the most intolerant trash on earth; they do not accept the sovereignty of anyone but them, and have been ethnically cleansing all minorities out of the mideast for 14 centuries. islam is a supremist death cult that does not tolerate the equal rights of others, and the fakestinians (an artificially manufactured people by the KGB) have been trying to slaughter the jews there for over 100 years.

THIS IS NOT A LAND ISSUE, and it never has been.

Got it, chimp?

But Palestinians are Christian too and Palestinians were a people at least as early as 1922. You are simply a propagandist repeating a Zionist lie that everyone knows is a lie now. The internet has made it easy to identify propagandist scum like you.

PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.

If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration.


UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)
 
what real government? what military? they want their own state. and you can't get away from your own nazi words

You're new here, and don't seem particularly intelligent so I'll keep it simple for you - the arab muslims are the most intolerant trash on earth; they do not accept the sovereignty of anyone but them, and have been ethnically cleansing all minorities out of the mideast for 14 centuries. islam is a supremist death cult that does not tolerate the equal rights of others, and the fakestinians (an artificially manufactured people by the KGB) have been trying to slaughter the jews there for over 100 years.

THIS IS NOT A LAND ISSUE, and it never has been.

Got it, chimp?

But Palestinians are Christian too and Palestinians were a people at least as early as 1922. You are simply a propagandist repeating a Zionist lie that everyone knows is a lie now. The internet has made it easy to identify propagandist scum like you.

PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:


Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.

If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration.


UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)
Yep. The people of Palestine being the Jews living there.
 
But Palestinians are Christian too and Palestinians were a people at least as early as 1922.

Guess what, c-nt, there is NOTHING in that letter that describes a singular group of indigenous, unique people there as "palestinians;" it merely refers to people living in the REGION called "palestine" formerly under Ottoman control, and now the British. Had these people been a true "nation" or unique, the letter would have described them as such. In fact the part you left out:

""certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognised subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.""

CLEARLY admits that these were merely communities under Turkish rule, NOT A SINGLE NATION.

Second, the racism of the arab muslims is quite clear as well, referring to the jews as "alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type..." Funny how leftist fucking turds like you whine about Trump's comments about mexicans - but of course, as anti-semitic filth you extol such racist comments about jews, who are very low on the leftist pecking order.

Last, this letter shows the abject intolerance I was referring to earlier, where arab muslims WILL NOT TOLERATE the sovereignty of anyone else in the mideast - only them.

Thanks for the link, and doing an excellent job helping my claims and positions.
 
the nazis did
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
what real government? what military?

they want their own state.

and you can't get away from your own nazi words
You ask what government? Is it true? Is ignorance truely bliss?

http://www.ips-dc.org/hamas_wins_the_palestinian_elections/
they aren't sovereign. they aren't able to raise a defense, or protect their people from israel. there is no real government, just figment of one
 
The PA warns the world they will encourage Arabs to hijack planes if demands are not met and the world is not more sympathetic to their plight. It's time to put the foot down.


PA Official Threatens: If World Not Sympathetic to Arab Cause, Arabs Will Hijack More Planes, Cut off Oil Supply

Senior Palestinian official and former peace negotiator Nabil Shaath said in an recent interview that if the Western world does not pay attention to the Arab cause, it risks more plane hijackings and global economic crises emanating from the Middle East.

In the interview, translated and released by MEMRI, Shaath slammed efforts to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and had special criticism for the American role in peace negotiations, saying, “Anything is better than American control of the negotiations. Anything. The US has never been a reliable honest broker. Never.”

He added that the US was “the strategic ally of Israel. Period.”

He said that the PA wanted an alternative negotiating strategy, referencing PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s call for talks “similar to the P5+1 framework”, which negotiated the recently-implemented Iran nuclear deal.


Read more at PA Official: Do We Have to Hijack Your Planes Again? - Israel News

After all, their founder world renowned terrorist Yasser Arafat (may he burn in hell) invented airplane hijacking so Palestinians are just following a cultural pastime.
 
Yeah, and the world kicked their asses for it.
Just like the world should eradicate the Palestinian evildoers.
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
what real government? what military?

they want their own state.

and you can't get away from your own nazi words
You ask what government? Is it true? Is ignorance truely bliss?

http://www.ips-dc.org/hamas_wins_the_palestinian_elections/
they aren't sovereign. they aren't able to raise a defense, or protect their people from israel. there is no real government, just figment of one
Because the Palestinians are scum. Even their fellow arabs know it and prevent them from immigrating into their nations.
 
you are the nazi in this analogy.

do you want your ass kicked?
Can't stay on topic. Understandable considering your losing position of supporting Palestinian scum.

How many Jews in the Paelestinian government?
How many Jews in the Palestinian military?
What is the requirement for Palestinians to say they will live in peace with Jews?
Game over.
what real government? what military?

they want their own state.

and you can't get away from your own nazi words
You ask what government? Is it true? Is ignorance truely bliss?

http://www.ips-dc.org/hamas_wins_the_palestinian_elections/
they aren't sovereign. they aren't able to raise a defense, or protect their people from israel. there is no real government, just figment of one
Because the Palestinians are scum. .
you make a good nazi
 
P F Tinmore,

You have to read this --- every word carefully. (Apparently, you are confuse with the mening of "lie.")

P F Tinmore, et al,

I agree, 100%.

[
The UN Charter stipulates that ALL peoples have the "equal rights and self-determination."​

Have you heard the legal expression "Your right to swing your fist stops at the end of my nose?"

Everybody has rights, but nobody has the "right" to violate the rights of others.
(COMMENT)

Thus the Arab Palestinian right to swing ends at asymmetric warfare.

No one denied the Arab Palestinians any rights. They just have never exercised them at the optimum time. And remember, the Arab Palestinian has no right to obstruct the Israel Right to Self-determination.

The title and rights to the territory went to the Allied Powers.
The Allied Powers set the conditions for immigration and the establishment of a Jewish National Home.
The Arabs did not like it.
The Arabs began a low intensity conflict.
The Jewish exercised their right to self-determination and declared independence.
The Arab low intensity conflict blossomed into a greater war support by the Arab League to achieve what they could not political acquire.
The Israeli's defeat the Arab contingent.
The Arab Palestinians refuse to make peace.
TheArabs periodically instigate conflict and blame it on the Israeli's​

There it is.

Most Respectfully,
R
The title and rights to the territory went to the Allied Powers.​

That is a lie. The Allied Powers held the territory in trust for the inhabitants.

The rest of your post is a crock of shit based on your false premise.
(COMMENT)

There is no "FAILS PREMISE." By Treaty, the future of these territories (renounced by the Ottoman/Turks --- to which the Mandate would apply) were to be settled by the Allied Powers (see Article 16 below).

Nothing in the Treaty of Lausanne or the League of Nations Covenant (not even Article 22) extends a promise to the Arab Palestinians; for anything. While the word "trust" is used in the covenant, as in "sacred trust" --- this refers to the "the reliance in the honesty," --- as in "a the sacred trust of civilization" --- OR --- strength and ability in the "performance of this trust." All focused on the "principle that the well-being and development;" which in most cases the Arab Palestinian rejected (three times before 1923). THIS IS NOT the same thing as confidence placed in a Mandatory by making that authority the nominal government over the of territory. And further, it is not even close to: 1) should be entrusted to advanced nations; 2) will entrust the League. And when Article 22 talks about "Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire," --- it does not actually mention which "certain communities." Nothing in Article 22 is a promise to the Arab Palestinian. The territory did not go into Trust with the UN until
18 April 1946, when the League transfers all its assets to the United Nations (Article 77 Charter).

The three most relevant documents: 1) the Mudros Armistice (1918) Article 16,; 2) the Treaty of Sevres (1920) Article 132, and of course; 3) 1923 Peace Conference of Lausanne. All historic documents say substantially the same thing:


ARTICLE 16. Treaty of Lausanne: Part I --- Political Clauses

Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognized by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

As you can see quite clearly, the Treaty relinquishes the "Title and Rights" of the former Sovereign (Ottoman/Turkish Empire) to the Allied Powers. The Treaty of Lausanne, nor any party thereto, is not hostage to Article 22. The Covenant does not speak to the Arab Palestinians. The Covenant is an arrangement between the members of the League; with any disputes resolved by decision of the League. Disputes that arise between a 1) Member of the League and a State which is not a Member of the League, or 2) between States not Members of the League, 3) the State or States not Members of the League are resolved pursuant to the provisions of Articles 12 to 16 inclusive. At no time, during the life of the Covenant, were the Arab Palestinians ever included. They were non-state actors until 1988; but the UN becoming the successor in 1945.

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Forum List

Back
Top