On July 1, one bullet makes a law abiding gun owner into a criminal, and it's insane....

[martybegan]

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

 

[2aguy]

Yes....so was keeping blacks from eating at the lunch counter, sitting at the back of the bus, and keeping blacks from voting using poll taxes and literacy tests.....that too was called complying with the law and millions did it back then when democrats created those laws.....

Those laws were challenged and overturned in the courts

You are welcome to attempt to do the same

It was overturned, by Heller, and the democrats keep ignoring Heller.......

Heller had nothing to do with Civil Rights

Dip shit...Heller had everything to do with Civil Rights.......the one area of the Bill of Rights under constant attack with no one in the main stream press fighting against the attack...

If the gun law had said "Blacks are not allowed to buy guns" it would have involved Civil Rights

But even Heller allows you to limit the size of magazines

No, actually, it doesn't. limiting magazine sizes has nothing to do with the weapon being "unusual".....and it does not prevent crime or mass shootings with those magazines.....you are limiting a freedom for no other reason than you don't like those magazines.....and we don't limit Constitutional Rights based on how you feel about them...

 

[rightwinger]

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

 

[2aguy]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Yeah we had a law like that pass in CT after Sandy Hook.

Completely ridiculous. SO now instead of 1 15 round magazine and one in the chamber I now carry 10+1 and another 10 in a spare mag

so instead of 16 rounds I now carry 21 that is until there is some limit put on how many spare mags a person with a CCW can carry

That is next....the 4th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that military weapons are not protected by the 2nd Amendment....so the next step is to ban any weapon that holds a magazine.....they will then move to bolt action rifles, then to pump action shot guns.....

 

[rightwinger]

Those laws were challenged and overturned in the courts

You are welcome to attempt to do the same

It was overturned, by Heller, and the democrats keep ignoring Heller.......

Heller had nothing to do with Civil Rights

Dip shit...Heller had everything to do with Civil Rights.......the one area of the Bill of Rights under constant attack with no one in the main stream press fighting against the attack...

If the gun law had said "Blacks are not allowed to buy guns" it would have involved Civil Rights

But even Heller allows you to limit the size of magazines

No, actually, it doesn't. limiting magazine sizes has nothing to do with the weapon being "unusual".....and it does not prevent crime or mass shootings with those magazines.....you are limiting a freedom for no other reason than you don't like those magazines.....and we don't limit Constitutional Rights based on how you feel about them...

Makes things inconvenient if you want to shoot up a movie theater or classroom full of first graders

 

[2aguy]

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

 

[martybegan]

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

He wasn't sitting in the theater. he assaulted it.

 

[2aguy]

It was overturned, by Heller, and the democrats keep ignoring Heller.......

Heller had nothing to do with Civil Rights

Dip shit...Heller had everything to do with Civil Rights.......the one area of the Bill of Rights under constant attack with no one in the main stream press fighting against the attack...

If the gun law had said "Blacks are not allowed to buy guns" it would have involved Civil Rights

But even Heller allows you to limit the size of magazines

No, actually, it doesn't. limiting magazine sizes has nothing to do with the weapon being "unusual".....and it does not prevent crime or mass shootings with those magazines.....you are limiting a freedom for no other reason than you don't like those magazines.....and we don't limit Constitutional Rights based on how you feel about them...

Makes things inconvenient if you want to shoot up a movie theater or classroom full of first graders

No it doesn't...none of the shootings we have had would have been impacted in any way with magazine limits...as my link to the actual research on the topic showed....

You don't have facts, truth or reality on your side.....

 

[2aguy]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

 

[2aguy]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

No....I would contact the cops...since carrying a rifle is an aggressive act.....and disturbs the peace...

 

[2aguy]

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

Again...it is a provative act and disturbs the peace....a holstered pistol is neither of those things...

 

[rightwinger]

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

In your world he and all his friends are welcome to bring all the guns and ammo into a movie theater. It is part of keeping America safe

 

[2aguy]

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

In your world he and all his friends are welcome to bring all the guns and ammo into a movie theater. It is part of keeping America safe

Nope......someone who did would be disturbing the peace, and local cops could come in and ask him to leave....or, like this guy...who walked into a gun free zone exactly like that but started shooting unarmed people.....then the cops would be there in 3 minutes while defenseless people would be murdered.....

 

[rightwinger]

So Californians

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you will have to do it with magazines less than ten rounds.

I realize how inconvenient it is for you and having to constantly load magazines interferes with the joy of shooting six year olds but you will have to live with it

 

[rightwinger]

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

Like these guys?

 

[2aguy]

So Californians

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you will have to do it with magazines less than ten rounds.

I realize how inconvenient it is for you and having to constantly load magazines interferes with the joy of shooting six year olds but you will have to live with it

And of course they already do.....the Sorority shooter in California, used the legal 10 round magazines......

limiting magazines does nothing to stop mass shooters and assholes like you know it. You will be back to get all magazines in the next go around........

 

[2aguy]

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

Like these guys?

Yep....they should have been asked to leave by the police because they were disturbing the peace. If they just had pistols there wouldn't be that problem.....

 

[2aguy]

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

Nope....if you see someone like that you call the police and let them question the guy....he is disturbing the peace.....and until they arrive, you would be safer if you had your own gun....

Since the theater goers where he actually did show up, didn't have guns, and he murdered them without them being able to stop him till the police arrived...

So your whole point is stupid...since this actually happened....and no one was able to stop it..because assholes like you disarmed them..while this guy did what he wanted.

Like these guys?

And notice...they aren't shooting people, are they? They must not be Bernie Sanders supporters, or black lies matter sympathizers....

 

[rightwinger]

So Californians

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you will have to do it with magazines less than ten rounds.

I realize how inconvenient it is for you and having to constantly load magazines interferes with the joy of shooting six year olds but you will have to live with it

And of course they already do.....the Sorority shooter in California, used the legal 10 round magazines......

limiting magazines does nothing to stop mass shooters and assholes like you know it. You will be back to get all magazines in the next go around........

I feel so sorry about inconveniencing mass shooters
They have their rights too

What fun is shooting six year olds if you have to keep reloading?

 

[2aguy]

So Californians

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you will have to do it with magazines less than ten rounds.

I realize how inconvenient it is for you and having to constantly load magazines interferes with the joy of shooting six year olds but you will have to live with it

And of course they already do.....the Sorority shooter in California, used the legal 10 round magazines......

limiting magazines does nothing to stop mass shooters and assholes like you know it. You will be back to get all magazines in the next go around........

I feel so sorry about inconveniencing mass shooters
They have their rights too

What fun is shooting six year olds if you have to keep reloading?

And as actual research shows...you aren't inconveniencing mass shooters.....shooting unarmed people allows you to reload at your leisure...it is only when those victims can shoot back that you are stopped....