On gay rights, Republican/conservatives have three distinct and separate positions

[rdean]

You really need to review what "standard of evidence" means. There was not a shred of evidence for anything you've said in that stupid video.
Fail.

So the words being spoken out of the mouths of your Republican Leadership isn't "evidence" enough?

Them actually saying the words isn't evidence?

You see what I mean about "imagination" and a "parallel universe"?

No you are supplying the imagination that they actually support what you contend. There is no evidence they do. What they suggest is that U.S. intelligence--and that of every other major country--was wrong. But it wasn't. Iraq did have programs for development of WMD. No one dreamed that up.
Would you like a list of quotations of Bill Clinton and other Dems saying essentially the same thing? That Iraq was the biggest threat to mideast peace, that they were destabilizing, that they had WMD? Because those have been supplied many times already.
It takes an act of supreme partisan imagination to think Bush was the only one who said this and everyone else knew better.

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. They had no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Conservatives are strange. The only time they are against gay rights is when they are against gay rights.

The truth is, they live in a parallel universe where things are how hey imagine them to be.

The good thing about imagination is that it's flexible. It's what ever you imagine it to be.

You can imagine that Iraq was connected to Bin Laden.

Then you can imagine that he wasn't. Not only that, you can imagine that no one ever said he was.

You can imagine that big corporations will take care of you. Even when they send jobs over seas and fire Americans, you can still imagine they have the "best interests" of the American people in their little lead hearts.

Republicans may not have a lot of "book learnin'", but they have lots of "imagination".

Actually liberals imagine that Bush said we were attacking Iraq because of bin Laden.
They imagine that Gore actually won in FL in 2000.
They imagine that repeal of regulations that didn't do anything to stop bad bank decisions resulted in a meltdown 9 years later.
And they imagine that Obama could be a competent president.

No, liberals are known for their imagination. And that's the proof.

I'm sorry. You were saying?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o]YouTube - WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP[/ame]

People making statements of what they believe to be true does not mean that they lie.

It does tell me that you have never read the Duelfer report though.

 

[The Rabbi]

So the words being spoken out of the mouths of your Republican Leadership isn't "evidence" enough?

Them actually saying the words isn't evidence?

You see what I mean about "imagination" and a "parallel universe"?

No you are supplying the imagination that they actually support what you contend. There is no evidence they do. What they suggest is that U.S. intelligence--and that of every other major country--was wrong. But it wasn't. Iraq did have programs for development of WMD. No one dreamed that up.
Would you like a list of quotations of Bill Clinton and other Dems saying essentially the same thing? That Iraq was the biggest threat to mideast peace, that they were destabilizing, that they had WMD? Because those have been supplied many times already.
It takes an act of supreme partisan imagination to think Bush was the only one who said this and everyone else knew better.

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. The no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

The "we" here includes the intelligence agencies of every major country. That includes the Czechs who stand by their story of contacts between agents of al Qaeda and Iraq.
And if it were so obvious, why did numerous Democrats, including John Kerry, vote for the war?

 

[SFC Ollie]

So the words being spoken out of the mouths of your Republican Leadership isn't "evidence" enough?

Them actually saying the words isn't evidence?

You see what I mean about "imagination" and a "parallel universe"?

No you are supplying the imagination that they actually support what you contend. There is no evidence they do. What they suggest is that U.S. intelligence--and that of every other major country--was wrong. But it wasn't. Iraq did have programs for development of WMD. No one dreamed that up.
Would you like a list of quotations of Bill Clinton and other Dems saying essentially the same thing? That Iraq was the biggest threat to mideast peace, that they were destabilizing, that they had WMD? Because those have been supplied many times already.
It takes an act of supreme partisan imagination to think Bush was the only one who said this and everyone else knew better.

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. They had no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

And Saddam admitted that he wanted the world to believe he still had WMD so he wouldn't appear weak to Iran. He played a dangerous game and lost.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

rdean does a lot of talking and it's very obvious, very little listening.

 

[rdean]

No you are supplying the imagination that they actually support what you contend. There is no evidence they do. What they suggest is that U.S. intelligence--and that of every other major country--was wrong. But it wasn't. Iraq did have programs for development of WMD. No one dreamed that up.
Would you like a list of quotations of Bill Clinton and other Dems saying essentially the same thing? That Iraq was the biggest threat to mideast peace, that they were destabilizing, that they had WMD? Because those have been supplied many times already.
It takes an act of supreme partisan imagination to think Bush was the only one who said this and everyone else knew better.

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. The no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

The "we" here includes the intelligence agencies of every major country. That includes the Czechs who stand by their story of contacts between agents of al Qaeda and Iraq.
And if it were so obvious, why did numerous Democrats, including John Kerry, vote for the war?

The knowledge is so common, you didn't bother to put a link?

 

[rdean]

rdean does a lot of talking and it's very obvious, very little listening.

then stay away

 

[rdean]

No you are supplying the imagination that they actually support what you contend. There is no evidence they do. What they suggest is that U.S. intelligence--and that of every other major country--was wrong. But it wasn't. Iraq did have programs for development of WMD. No one dreamed that up.
Would you like a list of quotations of Bill Clinton and other Dems saying essentially the same thing? That Iraq was the biggest threat to mideast peace, that they were destabilizing, that they had WMD? Because those have been supplied many times already.
It takes an act of supreme partisan imagination to think Bush was the only one who said this and everyone else knew better.

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. They had no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

And Saddam admitted that he wanted the world to believe he still had WMD so he wouldn't appear weak to Iran. He played a dangerous game and lost.

He was invaded on a game?

The problem with conservatives defending Bush is that they are insulting our intelligence agencies by saying our intelligence was so inept and so incompetent that after all that happened to Iraq, especially after their butts were kicked out of Kuwait, our intelligence agencies spent zero time watching a country that invaded another country and we had a war with?

Who could believe that? We had a war with Iraq and then just stopped watching them? Does that make any sense? It's not possible to believe that.

9/11 happened and then Republicans went after the Democrats accusing them of siding with the terrorists. One of the dirtiest things a political party ever did in this country. "You are with us or with the terrorists". Republicans are still doing it today, only it's not working.

 

[HUGGY]

On gay rights, Republican/conservatives have three distinct and separate positions

Ya...Ya...We know

Top, Bottom and On Their Knees.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. They had no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

And Saddam admitted that he wanted the world to believe he still had WMD so he wouldn't appear weak to Iran. He played a dangerous game and lost.

He was invaded on a game?

The problem with conservatives defending Bush is that they are insulting our intelligence agencies by saying our intelligence was so inept and so incompetent that after all that happened to Iraq, especially after their butts were kicked out of Kuwait, our intelligence agencies spent zero time watching a country that invaded another country and we had a war with?

Who could believe that? We had a war with Iraq and then just stopped watching them? Does that make any sense? It's not possible to believe that.

9/11 happened and then Republicans went after the Democrats accusing them of siding with the terrorists. One of the dirtiest things a political party ever did in this country. "You are with us or with the terrorists". Republicans are still doing it today, only it's not working.

You truly do have a problem with reality don't you. Yes our intelligence fell to shit in the 90's do some reading and see for yourself. You are with us or against us was the theme of one of Bush43's speeches. He wasn't talking to Democrats but to other nations. (I think) At any rate. Yes if you are not with us then you must be against us. I find it rather awkward to think anyone could be neutral in the war on terror.

 

[The Rabbi]

Bush said Iraq wouldn't let inspectors in, but warned the "hundreds" of inspectors to get out before the US started dropping bombs.

Good God man, it was only a few years ago.

Iraq's military was devastated during two events. When Iraq and Iran fought for eight years and when we chased them out of Kuwait.

Then they were under sanctions. The small amount of poison gas they owned was purchased from Western Nations so everyone knew EXACTLY what they had. The no major industry, no manufacturing. Everything they owned came from other nations.

To say, "But we THOUGHT they had this or that" is an astounding lie. It's not possible. It's part of the beliefs of a "parallel universe".

How can conservatives say liberals have no common sense and then clearly believe the "unbelievable"?

The "we" here includes the intelligence agencies of every major country. That includes the Czechs who stand by their story of contacts between agents of al Qaeda and Iraq.
And if it were so obvious, why did numerous Democrats, including John Kerry, vote for the war?

The knowledge is so common, you didn't bother to put a link?

The Iraq/al-Qaida connection hasn't gone away. - By Edward Jay Epstein - Slate Magazine
That took all of 10 seconds to generate with Google. Surely you have that much imagination??

 

[The T]

Position #1:

Typified by Dick Cheney, former Republican vice-president and architect of America's energy policy and the invasion of Iraq.

Feels gays should have full rights as American Citizens.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - supportive and close.

Recent Activities - toured with an "anti-President Obama" and pro-torture agenda.

Dick Cheney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
________________________

Position #2:

Typified by Phyllis Schlafly, mother of the Modern Day American Conservative Movement.

Feels she did everything to raise her son as a heterosexual. Strong father, subservient mother, Christian values, no exposure to sex, home schooling. Is completely dumbfounded. Besides bewilderment, gives no official public opinion other than her son shares her position.

Gay connection - son.

Relation with son - Publicly admits to being confused, but loves and lives with son.

Recent Activities - Her straight son Andrew founded Conservapedia. At the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration suggested that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment" of Justice Anthony Kennedy, citing as specific grounds Justice Kennedy's deciding vote to abolish the death penalty for minors.

Phyllis Schlafly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
_______________________

Position #3:

Typified by Alan Keyes, former Republican presidential candidate, former Republican Senate Nominee - ran against Barrack H. Obama and served in the U.S. Foreign Service, was appointed Ambassador to the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations under President Ronald Reagan.

Feels gay sex is selfish hedonism and gay behaviour should be a criminal offense. Feels gay marriage destroys fundamental moral institutions and gays should have no protections such as hate crime laws, job protection, discrimination protection in housing.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - in the name of family values, Alan felt it appropriate to cut all financial and emotional ties with his daughter and ordered her out of the house, immediately. He contended that he must, "stand for the truth [Jesus Christ] represents," even if it breaks his heart.

Recent Activities - On May 8, 2009, Keyes and 21 others were arrested while protesting President Barack Obama's commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame. Keyes was charged with trespassing and released on $250 bond. He was arrested a second time on May 16.
Following Obama's inauguration, Keyes denied he had been constitutionally inaugurated, refused to call him president, and called him an "usurper" and a "radical communist".

Alan Keyes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Funny...Interesting...and partisan horseshit upon the OP.

GAYS have all the rights afforded to them under the Constitution of the United Staes.

'Nuff Said.

 

[SFC Ollie]

[

Position #1:

Typified by Dick Cheney, former Republican vice-president and architect of America's energy policy and the invasion of Iraq.

Feels gays should have full rights as American Citizens.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - supportive and close.

Recent Activities - toured with an "anti-President Obama" and pro-torture agenda.

Dick Cheney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
________________________


Position #2:

Typified by Phyllis Schlafly, mother of the Modern Day American Conservative Movement.

Feels she did everything to raise her son as a heterosexual. Strong father, subservient mother, Christian values, no exposure to sex, home schooling. Is completely dumbfounded. Besides bewilderment, gives no official public opinion other than her son shares her position.

Gay connection - son.

Relation with son - Publicly admits to being confused, but loves and lives with son.

Recent Activities - Her straight son Andrew founded Conservapedia. At the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration suggested that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment" of Justice Anthony Kennedy, citing as specific grounds Justice Kennedy's deciding vote to abolish the death penalty for minors.

Phyllis Schlafly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
_______________________



Position #3:

Typified by Alan Keyes, former Republican presidential candidate, former Republican Senate Nominee - ran against Barrack H. Obama and served in the U.S. Foreign Service, was appointed Ambassador to the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations under President Ronald Reagan.

Feels gay sex is selfish hedonism and gay behaviour should be a criminal offense. Feels gay marriage destroys fundamental moral institutions and gays should have no protections such as hate crime laws, job protection, discrimination protection in housing.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - in the name of family values, Alan felt it appropriate to cut all financial and emotional ties with his daughter and ordered her out of the house, immediately. He contended that he must, "stand for the truth [Jesus Christ] represents," even if it breaks his heart.

Recent Activities - On May 8, 2009, Keyes and 21 others were arrested while protesting President Barack Obama's commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame. Keyes was charged with trespassing and released on $250 bond. He was arrested a second time on May 16.
Following Obama's inauguration, Keyes denied he had been constitutionally inaugurated, refused to call him president, and called him an "usurper" and a "radical communist".

Alan Keyes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Funny...Interesting...and partisan horseshit upon the OP.

GAYS have all the rights afforded to them under the Constitution of the United Staes.

'Nuff Said.

Exactly the same as the rest of us.

 

[The T]

[

Position #1:

Typified by Dick Cheney, former Republican vice-president and architect of America's energy policy and the invasion of Iraq.

Feels gays should have full rights as American Citizens.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - supportive and close.

Recent Activities - toured with an "anti-President Obama" and pro-torture agenda.

Dick Cheney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
________________________


Position #2:

Typified by Phyllis Schlafly, mother of the Modern Day American Conservative Movement.

Feels she did everything to raise her son as a heterosexual. Strong father, subservient mother, Christian values, no exposure to sex, home schooling. Is completely dumbfounded. Besides bewilderment, gives no official public opinion other than her son shares her position.

Gay connection - son.

Relation with son - Publicly admits to being confused, but loves and lives with son.

Recent Activities - Her straight son Andrew founded Conservapedia. At the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration suggested that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment" of Justice Anthony Kennedy, citing as specific grounds Justice Kennedy's deciding vote to abolish the death penalty for minors.

Phyllis Schlafly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
_______________________



Position #3:

Typified by Alan Keyes, former Republican presidential candidate, former Republican Senate Nominee - ran against Barrack H. Obama and served in the U.S. Foreign Service, was appointed Ambassador to the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations under President Ronald Reagan.

Feels gay sex is selfish hedonism and gay behaviour should be a criminal offense. Feels gay marriage destroys fundamental moral institutions and gays should have no protections such as hate crime laws, job protection, discrimination protection in housing.

Gay connection - daughter.

Relation with daughter - in the name of family values, Alan felt it appropriate to cut all financial and emotional ties with his daughter and ordered her out of the house, immediately. He contended that he must, "stand for the truth [Jesus Christ] represents," even if it breaks his heart.

Recent Activities - On May 8, 2009, Keyes and 21 others were arrested while protesting President Barack Obama's commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame. Keyes was charged with trespassing and released on $250 bond. He was arrested a second time on May 16.
Following Obama's inauguration, Keyes denied he had been constitutionally inaugurated, refused to call him president, and called him an "usurper" and a "radical communist".

Alan Keyes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Funny...Interesting...and partisan horseshit upon the OP.

GAYS have all the rights afforded to them under the Constitution of the United Staes.

'Nuff Said.

Exactly the same as the rest of us.

Exactly Sarge. The Constitution speaks to ALL Citizens...regardless. Too many are claiming rights or non-rights where NONE exist. The Constitution is rather non-explicit in regard unto Liberty of the Individual.

Those that petition the Federal Government to something they already have...haven't READ IT...and go fourth on an ill-conceived notion.

 

[Political Junky]

Conservatives are strange. The only time they are against gay rights is when they are against gay rights.

The truth is, they live in a parallel universe where things are how hey imagine them to be.

The good thing about imagination is that it's flexible. It's what ever you imagine it to be.

You can imagine that Iraq was connected to Bin Laden.

Then you can imagine that he wasn't. Not only that, you can imagine that no one ever said he was.

You can imagine that big corporations will take care of you. Even when they send jobs over seas and fire Americans, you can still imagine they have the "best interests" of the American people in their little lead hearts.

Republicans may not have a lot of "book learnin'", but they have lots of "imagination".

Actually liberals imagine that Bush said we were attacking Iraq because of bin Laden.
They imagine that Gore actually won in FL in 2000.
They imagine that repeal of regulations that didn't do anything to stop bad bank decisions resulted in a meltdown 9 years later.
And they imagine that Obama could be a competent president.

No, liberals are known for their imagination. And that's the proof.

I'm sorry. You were saying?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o]YouTube - WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP[/ame]

This tape is a keeper, thanks.

 

[Sherry]

On gay rights, Republican/conservatives have three distinct and separate positions

Your world must be so neat and tidy with the way you place people in such little boxes.

 

[The Rabbi]

Actually liberals imagine that Bush said we were attacking Iraq because of bin Laden.
They imagine that Gore actually won in FL in 2000.
They imagine that repeal of regulations that didn't do anything to stop bad bank decisions resulted in a meltdown 9 years later.
And they imagine that Obama could be a competent president.

No, liberals are known for their imagination. And that's the proof.

I'm sorry. You were saying?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o]YouTube - WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP[/ame]

This tape is a keeper, thanks.

And here's where you can keep it:

 

[The T]

I'm sorry. You were saying?

YouTube - WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP

This tape is a keeper, thanks.

And here's where you can keep it:

Deservedly SO. It's where it belongs.

 

[rdean]

The "we" here includes the intelligence agencies of every major country. That includes the Czechs who stand by their story of contacts between agents of al Qaeda and Iraq.
And if it were so obvious, why did numerous Democrats, including John Kerry, vote for the war?

The knowledge is so common, you didn't bother to put a link?

The Iraq/al-Qaida connection hasn't gone away. - By Edward Jay Epstein - Slate Magazine
That took all of 10 seconds to generate with Google. Surely you have that much imagination??

DID YOU FUCKING BOTHER TO READ YOUR OPINION PIECE?

suggested
might be
the BIS lost track
which presumably he then passed on to the FBI
tentatively identified
the BIS assumed he had used a false identity
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity
the period when he was supposed to be in Prague

"The records revealed that Atta was in Virginia Beach during the time he supposedly met the Iraqi in Prague"

All these reports attributed to the FBI were, as it turns out, erroneous.

It is possible that Atta traveled under an unknown alias

But just because Atta could have been in Prague did not mean that he met al-Ani there on April 8, 2001. Eyewitness identification can often be mistaken.

Without those missing pieces—including cell phone logs, credit card charges, and interrogation records in the FBI's possession—the jigsaw puzzle remains incomplete.

Let me explain something to you. The entire reason Bin Laden attacked the US was because he was angry. The reason?

When Saddam invaded Kuwait, Bin Laden wanted to put together a coalition of military from Arab states to drive him out. Instead, the Arab states looked to the US. This infuriated Bin Laden. Remember, Bin Laden sees himself as a "cleric" for hard right Islam. He was angry that "infidels" would come to Arab holy lands and kill Arabs. That is the ENTIRE reason he attacked the US. This isn't "rumored" or "suggested". Bin Laden, following the rules of Islamic Jihad, TOLD US WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO AND WHY!

Bin Laden wanted to put together a coalition of Arabs to drive Saddam out of Kuwait and Republicans are going to "CLAIM" they were "FRIENDS"? Could you suggest anything more lame?

Worse, Saddam killed members of his own family to stay in power. His government was a secular government yet, according to Republicans, he was "FRIENDS" with a power mad cleric WHO WANTED TO ATTACK HIM?

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

Do you see what I mean about a "parallel universe" and "imagination"?

And you guys wonder why I ridicule Republicans???????

SHAME ON YOU PEOPLE FOR BELIEVING NONSENSE!!!!!!

SHAME

SHAME

SHAME

It's very possible that Obama could have gone after Bush for War Crimes and lying. But he told us that he just wanted to put it all behind us and get on with "living". I believe the majority of the American people believe he got it right. But because he chose NOT to go after Bush, doesn't mean Bush didn't lie. Bush got lucky.

 

[The T]

The knowledge is so common, you didn't bother to put a link?

The Iraq/al-Qaida connection hasn't gone away. - By Edward Jay Epstein - Slate Magazine
That took all of 10 seconds to generate with Google. Surely you have that much imagination??

DID YOU FUCKING BOTHER TO READ YOUR OPINION PIECE?

suggested
might be
the BIS lost track
which presumably he then passed on to the FBI
tentatively identified
the BIS assumed he had used a false identity
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity
the period when he was supposed to be in Prague

"The records revealed that Atta was in Virginia Beach during the time he supposedly met the Iraqi in Prague"

All these reports attributed to the FBI were, as it turns out, erroneous.

It is possible that Atta traveled under an unknown alias

But just because Atta could have been in Prague did not mean that he met al-Ani there on April 8, 2001. Eyewitness identification can often be mistaken.

Without those missing pieces—including cell phone logs, credit card charges, and interrogation records in the FBI's possession—the jigsaw puzzle remains incomplete.

Let me explain something to you. The entire reason Bin Laden attacked the US was because he was angry. The reason?

When Saddam invaded Kuwait, Bin Laden wanted to put together a coalition of military from Arab states to drive him out. Instead, the Arab states looked to the US. This infuriated Bin Laden. Remember, Bin Laden sees himself as a "cleric" for hard right Islam. He was angry that "infidels" would come to Arab holy lands and kill Arabs. That is the ENTIRE reason he attacked the US. This isn't "rumored" or "suggested". Bin Laden, following the rules of Islamic Jihad, TOLD US WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO AND WHY!

Bin Laden wanted to put together a coalition of Arabs to drive Saddam out of Kuwait and Republicans are going to "CLAIM" they were "FRIENDS"? Could you suggest anything more lame?

Worse, Saddam killed members of his own family to stay in power. His government was a secular government yet, according to Republicans, he was "FRIENDS" with a power mad cleric WHO WANTED TO ATTACK HIM?

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

Do you see what I mean about a "parallel universe" and "imagination"?

And you guys wonder why I ridicule Republicans???????

SHAME ON YOU PEOPLE FOR BELIEVING NONSENSE!!!!!!

SHAME

SHAME

SHAME

It's very possible that Obama could have gone after Bush for War Crimes and lying. But he told us that he just wanted to put it all behind us and get on with "living". I believe the majority of the American people believe he got it right. But because he chose NOT to go after Bush, doesn't mean Bush didn't lie. Bush got lucky.

Uh-uh...What the FUCK is WRONG with YOU? And WHY didn't Clinton meet the challange and leave it to BUSH?

Your Answer? Rascist BOY