Jihadi Jake says he has condemned Islamic terrorists many times but when asked to verify that claim with a quote, he used the old "I could do it but I don't want to" excuse. When that didn't work, he went to the old liberal standard strategy of diversion by playing the race card. Jake is a joke.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ohh look Obama making excuses for the riots
- Thread starter RetiredGySgt
- Start date
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,217
- 30,495
- 2,250
Jihadi Jake says he has condemned Islamic terrorists many times but when asked to verify that claim with a quote, he used the old "I could do it but I don't want to" excuse. When that didn't work, he went to the old liberal standard strategy of diversion by playing the race card. Jake is a joke.
Do you really think Jake supports the terrorists, or the lack of him specifically stating that means he does? Only a brain dead right winger would think that. Come to think of it, I don't think I have ever seen you specifically say that you like Mom or Apple Pie. Why do you hate Mom, and what did Apple Pie ever do to you?
Try being honest, dickwad. Jake made a point of saying he has regularly condemned Islamic terrorists on USMB. I asked him to post a link of him condemning Islamic terrorists and he could not do it. Instead of running interference for your butt buddy Jake, why don't you help him search the archives to find an example of him condemning Islamic terrorism? Oh, you can't find any either? I didn't think so.Jihadi Jake says he has condemned Islamic terrorists many times but when asked to verify that claim with a quote, he used the old "I could do it but I don't want to" excuse. When that didn't work, he went to the old liberal standard strategy of diversion by playing the race card. Jake is a joke.
Do you really think Jake supports the terrorists, or the lack of him specifically stating that means he does? Only a brain dead right winger would think that. Come to think of it, I don't think I have ever seen you specifically say that you like Mom or Apple Pie. Why do you hate Mom, and what did Apple Pie ever do to you?
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #164
S. J. is a racialist, as we all know. S. J. has made a claim he can't support. He has gone by the old racial JBS standard of smearing another's character without any proof, while his racialism is well known.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #165
S. J. condemned me for supporting jihadism, I told him I don't, and then he reared when confronted with his well know racialism.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #167
See post 165.
No one can ever show where I support jihadism, though we all know S. J. is a regular racialist.
He can't do anything about the comparison, so he continues to deflect, which permits me to keep pointing out his well known racialism.
No one can ever show where I support jihadism, though we all know S. J. is a regular racialist.
He can't do anything about the comparison, so he continues to deflect, which permits me to keep pointing out his well known racialism.
No one can show where you've condemned it, like you claimed. Why don't you prove me wrong by posting some of your quotes? You've had several days now to find one.See post 165.
No one can ever show where I support jihadism, though we all know S. J. is a regular racialist.
He can't do anything about the comparison, so he continues to deflect, which permits me to keep pointing out his well known racialism.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #169
S. J. is defecting from the fact that he was wrong about the riots, that is indeed a vicious racist, and yet again I kicked his ass up between his ears.
Shit to be you, son
Shit to be you, son
Still can't find a quote, eh? Guess you'll just have to keep deflecting.S. J. is defecting from the fact that he was wrong about the riots, that is indeed a vicious racist, and yet again I kicked his ass up between his ears.
Shit to be you, son
"Ohh look Obama making excuses for the riots"
Oh, look, another lie from the right.
Oh, look, another lie from the right.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #172
S. J. the racialist can't prove I am projihadist so he keeps losing.
Misty
Gold Member
- Aug 11, 2009
- 7,137
- 1,957
- 245
No one has a problem holding police responsible but to take these few random cases and riot over them is hypocritical.Obama Police must hold officers accountable for wrongdoing - Yahoo News
Remind us again how he is not supporting the riots.
You got a problem with holding police responsible for their wrong doing?
That neighborhood has many more black on black murders yet blacks don't seem to care about that.
I've even heard some men saying that the black officer driving probably didn't do anything to Freddie. They want to pin it all on Whitey.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #174
Misty, your comment is silly.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 81
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 164
- Replies
- 105
- Views
- 822
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 202
- Views
- 710
- Replies
- 319
- Views
- 2K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8088
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-