trust me, you do NOT want single payerI mean yeah! Once upon a time (22 years ago) I was a reasonably healthy single adult, and I didn't even pay that.
I know it's gone up, but I don't believe for a MINUTE it's a thousand bucks worth of gone up!
Hell, $95 a month is about what we were paying for family coverage when my husband and I had the youngest.
I know it's gone up since then, but I KNOW it isn't a thousand. We put only two thousand in the medical savings account for the year to cover prescriptions for the year, and we are still covering the college age kid!
1000 a month? Where does Madelbrain live? MARS???
He was 22 when out of college. Ran cross country, only health issue was 'sports induced asthma', meaning an inhaler needed immediately after race, to avoid vomiting and dry heaves, (non-life threatening).
For $95 a month, he'd have to pay for doctor visits, meds, etc. BUT, if the worst happened and needed hospitalization and perhaps cancer treatments, or etc., he'd have been covered. He opted out. I was upset, but he did get full time job in 9 months.
BTW, he never did go to doctor or hospital. His gamble worked.
One reason we needed health care reform was, the policy your son was offered was not "health insurance" IMO. It is fairly easy to be bankrupted by health care costs without staying the night in a hospital.
I am not all that pleased with Obamacare -- I support government-provided, single payor coverage. But if the Tea Party wants to repeal it, will they be addressing any of the unmet needs (lifetime spending caps, portability, pre-exisitng conditions, etc.) we all agree existed before?
Or are we going to be hearing more about "social darwinism" where poor people who cannot afford insurance just fucking die?