- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,201
- 2,180
15 PhDs who are all sucking on the government tit. They get paid to prove the AGW is true. What a surprise that they would publish papers to that effect.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ocean Acidification pHraud
- Thread starter IanC
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #182
15 PhDs who are all sucking on the government tit. They get paid to prove the AGW is true. What a surprise that they would publish papers to that effect.For all you know, the man specialized in crop irrigation.
That you immediately accept the word of Wallace against the professional opinion of 15 PhDs in a peer reviewed paper tends to indicate that you approached the question with an answer already in mind.
Yup. They collected a few years of data, shoehorned it into a computer model that disagrees with past data, and make doomsday predictions for the future. SOP.
No worries. There is nothing I can do about the fact you can't be persuaded by a predicted rise in temperature due to the greenhouse gas effect followed by an observed temperature rise.Yep, he isn't me and sir until you can show an experiment that CO2 is the cause I'm in. But alas you can't.
After all, predictions and observations are almost as unscientific as consensus.
A little. I was more interested in his article in the WSJ, where he effectively admits to his inability to be convinced against his prejudices...McIntyre's video covers the same ground as Muller did in his, just with more detail (that you could independently check). Did Muller lie? Did you even watch Muller's video?
The Case Against Global-Warming Skepticism
Richard A. Muller The Case Against Global-Warming Skepticism - WSJ
When we began our study, we felt that skeptics had raised legitimate issues, and we didn't know what we'd find. Our results turned out to be close to those published by prior groups. We think that means that those groups had truly been very careful in their work, despite their inability to convince some skeptics of that. They managed to avoid bias in their data selection, homogenization and other corrections.
Global warming is real. Perhaps our results will help cool this portion of the climate debate. How much of the warming is due to humans and what will be the likely effects? We made no independent assessment of that.
Richard A. Muller The Case Against Global-Warming Skepticism - WSJ
When we began our study, we felt that skeptics had raised legitimate issues, and we didn't know what we'd find. Our results turned out to be close to those published by prior groups. We think that means that those groups had truly been very careful in their work, despite their inability to convince some skeptics of that. They managed to avoid bias in their data selection, homogenization and other corrections.
Global warming is real. Perhaps our results will help cool this portion of the climate debate. How much of the warming is due to humans and what will be the likely effects? We made no independent assessment of that.
I'm amused at the way cataloguing the people you consider to be duping/duped with/by the global warming scam is being a dumbass.Why respond at all. You're obsessed with being a dumbass.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
It's what one is when one ignores the fact there is no evidence!I'm amused at the way cataloguing the people you consider to be duping/duped with/by the global warming scam is being a dumbass.Why respond at all. You're obsessed with being a dumbass.
Well, only that from the duped/duping. Which category is NASA, btw?
Data.GISS GISS Surface Temperature Analysis Analysis Graphs and Plots
Data.GISS GISS Surface Temperature Analysis Analysis Graphs and Plots
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
well I'll go with this even though I question the actual dataset used, and no temperatures are provided, however, still no evidence concerning CO2. Still waiting. This graph even shows the pause. interesting, even questioning the dataset still can't get you where you need to be able to prove anything. There is 1940 to 1970 showing cooling when supposedly CO2 was increasing and the current pause, again with supposed CO2 increases. Not sure what you're trying to prove with this graph.Well, only that from the duped/duping. Which category is NASA, btw?
Data.GISS GISS Surface Temperature Analysis Analysis Graphs and Plots
Evidence of warming. You agree?
Are the publishers duped or duping?
even though I question the actual dataset used
Are the publishers duped or duping?
YO MUHAMMED
What do you believe is the cause of the rapid warming observed over the last 150 years (assuming you believe it's been getting warmer)?
Global warming idiots are the most pathetic dumbshits on the face of the Earth.
It is practically impossible to be that fucking unintelligent.
What do you believe is the cause of the rapid warming observed over the last 150 years (assuming you believe it's been getting warmer)?
Who are wrong proven now!!!!'
"Wrong proven now"? Wow... didn't it occur to you to fix that while you could?
Last edited:
150 years? Where the fuck did you come up with that timeframe?YO MUHAMMED
Global warming idiots are the most pathetic dumbshits on the face of the Earth.
It is practically impossible to be that fucking unintelligent.
What do you believe is the cause of the rapid warming observed over the last 150 years (assuming you believe it's been getting warmer)?
Are you one of those global warming idiots?
This 'no evidence' trope is a laugh. I mean who really has evidence for anything?
Evidence for the theory of gravity? That two objects of different mass will fall at the same speed in a vacuum? The only evidence we have for that is a US government film, which obviously cannot be trusted.
I bet jc is as sceptical of the theory of gravity as he is of the greenhouse gas theory.
Evidence for the theory of gravity? That two objects of different mass will fall at the same speed in a vacuum? The only evidence we have for that is a US government film, which obviously cannot be trusted.
I bet jc is as sceptical of the theory of gravity as he is of the greenhouse gas theory.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
I guess you can't readEvidence of warming. You agree?
even though I question the actual dataset used
Are the publishers duped or duping?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
Drop a rock to the ground gravity, evidenceThis 'no evidence' trope is a laugh. I mean who really has evidence for anything?
Evidence for the theory of gravity? That two objects of different mass will fall at the same speed in a vacuum? The only evidence we have for that is a US government film, which obviously cannot be trusted.
I bet jc is as sceptical of the theory of gravity as he is of the greenhouse gas theory.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
Yes how many times do you want me to tell you that hundred and 30,000 times are 3000 times yes I believe they''re duped, liars whatever you wished to call themEvidence of warming. You agree?
even though I question the actual dataset used
Are the publishers duped or duping?
Last edited:
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,363
- 27,905
- 2,180
Guess I missed it. Sort of like you missing the experimentWho are wrong proven now!!!!'
"Wrong proven now"? Wow... didn't it occur to you to fix that while you could?
I certainly haven't been able to read where you've said whether you consider the publishers of that graph to be duped or duping.I guess you can't read
Similar threads
- Replies
- 96
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 38
- Views
- 534
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 155
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 103
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 105
- Replies
- 217
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 147
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-