Obstruction of IN-Justice

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by DGS49, May 17, 2019.

  1. DGS49
    Offline

    DGS49 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,249
    Thanks Received:
    1,592
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Ratings:
    +7,036
    Imagine we have a person who is wrongfully accused of a crime. The police and the district attorney subject him to a figurative colonoscopy of investigations. They check his bank accounts, his club memberships, his academic records, his emails and text messages, his social media accounts, his tax returns, and interview everyone he has ever known since high school.

    But again, he is innocent of any crime, and has been wrongfully accused.

    In an attempt to defend himself against this "legal" siege, he contacts his friends and tells them to reveal only the barest details of what they know, he tells his bank to examine the warrant with a fine tooth comb, and to refuse to provide anything but the bare minimum of information. He tells his Alma Mater to withhold everything possible from his academic records, providing only what is absolutely required. And so on.

    Is he "obstructing justice"? Hell no, he is just trying to protect himself against a malicious prosecution.

    To coin a phrase, he is obstructing INJUSTICE, which is not only NOT a crime; it is reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.

    Does any of this seem familiar?
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  2. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    21,112
    Thanks Received:
    2,905
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,895
    Dear DGS49
    It's more than just that.
    Firing people in his administration at any stage during the investigations
    is within his executive authority,
    but it will ALWAYS LOOK BAD OR SUSPECT in the eyes of critics.

    Trump cannot change this image that he was firing
    people because of the investigation, not because of things they were doing incompetently or unethically.

    People opposed to Trump are NOT going to believe this wasn't obstructionism.

    Just like people opposed to Clinton are always going to see
    criminal intent behind anything that goes wrong there as well!

    Instead of arguing back and forth, when we all know that's not going to change
    minds or public opinion, what we need to focus on
    is making sure all officials and agencies ACT ETHICALLY
    and totally AVOID any appearance or RISK of conflict of interest.

    In law, lawyers and judges are known to RECUSE themselves
    to avoid appearing in conflict. We need to go back to making
    policies based on solutions that effectively work for all sides for the public interest,
    and quit this business of taking sides for political expedience by one group over another!

    www.ethics-commission.net
     
  3. caddo kid
    Offline

    caddo kid Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,917
    Thanks Received:
    642
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,959

    Plenty of citizens in AmeriKKKa have been CONVICTED of brutal crimes, let alone "accused," served decades in prison, only to be found NOT GUILTY via DNA.

    Sad ass fact is most Republicans wanna keep these innocent folk in prison.

    So, big shit ..............

    what's your point?
     
  4. Old Yeller
    Offline

    Old Yeller Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2015
    Messages:
    9,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    driving
    Ratings:
    +9,083

    DJT is the one who actually took a look to give second chances. He implemented some official Justice Refotprm. What DId Mr.1% do? Over 8 years? Go golfing in Palm Springs?

    Pound sand TDS victim.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. caddo kid
    Offline

    caddo kid Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,917
    Thanks Received:
    642
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,959

    Innocence Project was around loooooooooooooooong before jack ass Trump ............
     
  6. DGS49
    Offline

    DGS49 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,249
    Thanks Received:
    1,592
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Ratings:
    +7,036
    I suppose the point of this thread is the lack of an underlying crime destroying the accusations of Obstruction of Justice. The Mueller team has emphatically taken the MINORITY view in the criminal justice community, one that no jury in the world would support in a formal trial.
     
  7. BlackFlag
    Offline

    BlackFlag BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    21,292
    Thanks Received:
    1,836
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    America
    Ratings:
    +15,485
    Lol look at the retarded peasant defending a guy who has spent his life losing lawsuits against people that he's cheated
     

Share This Page