Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The sheer waste in the stiumuls (and the fact that it hasn't worked) overrides any benefit the tax cuts give.Hey, thanks! I forgot about that one. Good stuff.
Any more, or is that the only one?
The 300 billion in tax cuts in the stimulus. Which Democratic special interest did they serve, ONLY?
The credit card reform bill?
Credit card reform? If you call higher rates and fees good for Americans, sure.
Um..you don't get it: I don't want anyone to "implement programs to help us."
In fact, I'd really like to see what would happen if the entire federal government just took a year off, and did nothing at all.
I get it alright. I think the words are lovely. But I don't believe it. When people like you stop collecting unemployment, medicare benefits, and social security, maybe I'll think it's sincere. Until then I think it's such bull.
Let me ask you something. Do you think that libs such as myself would be okay with working as hard as I have for my entire life, just to support deadbeats?? Willing to give my money away to anybody that asks?? That just doesn't make sense. Things happen and people need help sometimes. But it gets on my nerves when I constantly hear that libs are just good hearted schmucks that don't mind giving away their hard earned money for any sob story.
Well, I'm willing to TRY IT FOR A YEAR.
I doubt you could go a single day without a nanny state.
The sheer waste in the stiumuls (and the fact that it hasn't worked) overrides any benefit the tax cuts give.The 300 billion in tax cuts in the stimulus. Which Democratic special interest did they serve, ONLY?
The credit card reform bill?
Credit card reform? If you call higher rates and fees good for Americans, sure.
Are you deliberately being obtuse???
LOL, RECORD breaking two years..more like breaking the backs of the American people in two years, with PASSING the Largest TAKEOVER of our Economy and Health care Against the peoples wishes.
"Here's the math: Before the IPO, the government had recovered about $9.5 billion from GM, bringing the company's balance owed to $40 billion.
Last week, the government sold $11.8 billion of common stock, leaving GM still owing the government $28.2 billion.
Greg Martin, a spokesperson for the company, said money from any additional common stock sales would go straight to the Treasury. And so the underwriters' expansion of GM's IPO would bring the latest amount owed to taxpayers down to $25.83 billion."
I get it alright. I think the words are lovely. But I don't believe it. When people like you stop collecting unemployment, medicare benefits, and social security, maybe I'll think it's sincere. Until then I think it's such bull.
Let me ask you something. Do you think that libs such as myself would be okay with working as hard as I have for my entire life, just to support deadbeats?? Willing to give my money away to anybody that asks?? That just doesn't make sense. Things happen and people need help sometimes. But it gets on my nerves when I constantly hear that libs are just good hearted schmucks that don't mind giving away their hard earned money for any sob story.
Well, I'm willing to TRY IT FOR A YEAR.
I doubt you could go a single day without a nanny state.
A nanny state??? HA!!!! You're funny. I doubt that you could have kept up my schedule.
"The U.S. government bailed out GM for $50 billion after the automaker's 2009 bankruptcy.
The IPO caps the first stage of a turnaround that has taken the 102-year-old automaker from near-death to an unlikely Wall Street flotation favorite in 2010.
A successful stock debut may help the Obama administration argue that the controversial taxpayer bailout of GM was worthwhile.
The White House has said U.S. taxpayers are on track to recoup the full investment made by the administration and that it hopes to make substantial progress toward shedding the government's stake entirely by mid-to-late 2012."
The sheer waste in the stiumuls (and the fact that it hasn't worked) overrides any benefit the tax cuts give.The 300 billion in tax cuts in the stimulus. Which Democratic special interest did they serve, ONLY?
The credit card reform bill?
Credit card reform? If you call higher rates and fees good for Americans, sure.
Are you deliberately being obtuse???
The sheer waste in the stiumuls (and the fact that it hasn't worked) overrides any benefit the tax cuts give.
Credit card reform? If you call higher rates and fees good for Americans, sure.
Are you deliberately being obtuse???
No, but it looks like you are.
Classic ad hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Tell me wingnuts, what did Congress do that caused the employment downturn?
Tic tock, tic tock.
I'm sure it comforts you think feel that way.Are you deliberately being obtuse???
No, but it looks like you are.
I can vouch for the sincerity of the wingnuts obtuseness
Classic ad hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Tell me wingnuts, what did Congress do that caused the employment downturn?
Tic tock, tic tock.
I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?
Classic ad hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Tell me wingnuts, what did Congress do that caused the employment downturn?
Tic tock, tic tock.
I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?
And most republicans have two arms and two legs. And so do most democrats!!!
It must be a conspiracy
I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?
And most republicans have two arms and two legs. And so do most democrats!!!
It must be a conspiracy
Care to show me a list of repeals the Dems did of the Bush policies?
Classic ad hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Tell me wingnuts, what did Congress do that caused the employment downturn?
Tic tock, tic tock.
I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?
Laughable.
Yup, laughable, that's what you are. You just compared two projections to a reality and tried to make the argument that government spending CAUSED unemployment. Tell me genius, how does government spending cause unemployment?
And most republicans have two arms and two legs. And so do most democrats!!!
It must be a conspiracy
Care to show me a list of repeals the Dems did of the Bush policies?
Sure
The passed the Lily Ledbetter Act, which undid the opposition of the bush admin. They escalated in Afghanistan, reversing bush* policy of benign neglect. They oppose the Israeli building of new homes in the occupied territories where bush* did not. They support arms treaties with Russia. bush did not.
I could go on and on about abotion, taxes, deficit spending, immigration, the environment and a host of issue where the dems are the repubs are not the same
Classic ad hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Tell me wingnuts, what did Congress do that caused the employment downturn?
Tic tock, tic tock.
I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?From what most people have seen.....the Teabaggers never noticed all this, until some Black-dude won the Presidency.
What timing!!!!
There's only one way to deal with this teenager that has commandeered his mommy's computer and that is to ignore it.I would say that the Dems kept many of Bush policies going strong, even after Obama took over two years later. The other issue is they expanded many of the Bush policies that were destructive.
The Republicans are like Democrats, or the Democrats are like Republicans... Take your pick but know neither are conservative or small Government, so how did we get into this mess?From what most people have seen.....the Teabaggers never noticed all this, until some Black-dude won the Presidency.
What timing!!!!
The question I ask myself is if I should feed the Troll...
You serve your masters well, and you will be rewarded.
You serve your masters well, and you will be rewarded.
I cannot ignore Shaman's thread titles, so I thought this one was a joke.
