Obamagate. This is getting ugly.

[QUOTE="Clementine, post: 16740721, member: 34478"“]Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.[/QUOTE]

Surprise!
 
C6I9gGwVAAASdQG.jpg
Where's the window washers when you need them?
 
[QUOTE="Clementine, post: 16740721, member: 34478"“]Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

Surprise![/QUOTE]

Russian-Lover ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
Call over to Obama / Jarrett headquarters (his house) and ask for new material. Tell them your smack out.
 
The media is doing the usual deflection. Focus on stupid crap to avoid looking at the serious problem.

Looks like the Obama administration was more interested in spying on citizens and allies than on enemies. No wonder he was pushing for Hillary to win. He knew she'd cover this up.

“The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.

By the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.”

There’s more. All those Democrat accusations of Russians ‘hacking our election’? Guess what:

“Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction,….”
In other words they can do it but leave behind footprints that lead to Russia and not to the (Obama) CIA.
Believe it or not that’s still not the worst of it. Anyone ever call you paranoid because you’re afraid all these new ‘smart devices’ may be a bit too smart and can be used as spying instruments? Well your paranoia was justified:

“Among the various techniques profiled by WikiLeaks is “Weeping Angel”, developed by the CIA’s Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In ‘Fake-Off’ mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server.”

Wikileaks drops BOMBSHELL about "Russian" hacking

"This new scandal is titled as “Obamagate.” WikiLeaks revealed that Obama has made quite the history of wiretapping and hacking political opponents and friends alike. What a bombshell!!!

WikiLeaks made a list of all of Obama’s wire taps:

– The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;

– Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;

– Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;

-Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;

– Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);

– Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;

– Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception;

-Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.
Obama also wiretapped individuals in the US media which weren’t praising him:

– In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.

– Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance. The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”

– Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post."

BOMBSHELL: Assange Just Exposed Obama's Wiretapping ‘Victim List’ - ‘Obamagate’ Blows Wide Open!

Alan West? Are you kidding? He's about as credible as Alex Jones and Mark Levin. All bomb-throwers.
And Assange may have hacked some emails at some point, but since he's now the new hero for the alt-right, he's just like Trump: he can say anything he wants and you silly goons will just believe him.
 
The media is doing the usual deflection. Focus on stupid crap to avoid looking at the serious problem.

Looks like the Obama administration was more interested in spying on citizens and allies than on enemies. No wonder he was pushing for Hillary to win. He knew she'd cover this up.
For Obama citizens ARE the enemy.
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?

Just like Trump, they don't have any.
Let's just say for fun that Trump had credible evidence of Obama "tapp"ing his phones at Trump Tower. A credible, sane person would follow up with a quiet investigation, gather the evidence and then present FACTS to the American public. But all Trump has is a tweet...and it's a little, short one at that.
 
[QUOTE="Clementine, post: 16740721, member: 34478"“]Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

Surprise!

Russian-Lover ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[/QUOTE]


Wait for this day...
putin_trump.jpg
 
The media is doing the usual deflection. Focus on stupid crap to avoid looking at the serious problem.

Looks like the Obama administration was more interested in spying on citizens and allies than on enemies. No wonder he was pushing for Hillary to win. He knew she'd cover this up.

“The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.

By the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.”

There’s more. All those Democrat accusations of Russians ‘hacking our election’? Guess what:

“Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction,….”
In other words they can do it but leave behind footprints that lead to Russia and not to the (Obama) CIA.
Believe it or not that’s still not the worst of it. Anyone ever call you paranoid because you’re afraid all these new ‘smart devices’ may be a bit too smart and can be used as spying instruments? Well your paranoia was justified:

“Among the various techniques profiled by WikiLeaks is “Weeping Angel”, developed by the CIA’s Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In ‘Fake-Off’ mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server.”

Wikileaks drops BOMBSHELL about "Russian" hacking

"This new scandal is titled as “Obamagate.” WikiLeaks revealed that Obama has made quite the history of wiretapping and hacking political opponents and friends alike. What a bombshell!!!

WikiLeaks made a list of all of Obama’s wire taps:

– The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;

– Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;

– Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;

-Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;

– Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);

– Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;

– Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception;

-Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.
Obama also wiretapped individuals in the US media which weren’t praising him:

– In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.

– Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance. The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”

– Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post."

BOMBSHELL: Assange Just Exposed Obama's Wiretapping ‘Victim List’ - ‘Obamagate’ Blows Wide Open!
but...but....but....like....like....like....where is the proof he tapped Cheeto Jesus?

:uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3:
 
The media is doing the usual deflection. Focus on stupid crap to avoid looking at the serious problem.

Looks like the Obama administration was more interested in spying on citizens and allies than on enemies. No wonder he was pushing for Hillary to win. He knew she'd cover this up.

“The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.

By the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.”

There’s more. All those Democrat accusations of Russians ‘hacking our election’? Guess what:

“Among the key topical revelations is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyberattacks which portray Russia as the assailant. Discussing the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction,….”
In other words they can do it but leave behind footprints that lead to Russia and not to the (Obama) CIA.
Believe it or not that’s still not the worst of it. Anyone ever call you paranoid because you’re afraid all these new ‘smart devices’ may be a bit too smart and can be used as spying instruments? Well your paranoia was justified:

“Among the various techniques profiled by WikiLeaks is “Weeping Angel”, developed by the CIA’s Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In ‘Fake-Off’ mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server.”

Wikileaks drops BOMBSHELL about "Russian" hacking

"This new scandal is titled as “Obamagate.” WikiLeaks revealed that Obama has made quite the history of wiretapping and hacking political opponents and friends alike. What a bombshell!!!

WikiLeaks made a list of all of Obama’s wire taps:

– The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;

– Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;

– Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;

-Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;

– Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);

– Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;

– Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception;

-Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.
Obama also wiretapped individuals in the US media which weren’t praising him:

– In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.

– Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance. The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”

– Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post."

BOMBSHELL: Assange Just Exposed Obama's Wiretapping ‘Victim List’ - ‘Obamagate’ Blows Wide Open!

Something to consider here...we know for a fact that the Obama administration spied on both its citizens and allies.( Part and parcel of his hatred for the west.) But I saw an interesting article yesterday that the bugs on Trump were more likely "deep state" than from Barrack Hussein Soetoro Obama himself. Surely he and Hillary received advantageous data from them since the entrenched elites were supporters. But I think this may have been sort of a rouge operation.
And of course it is no surprise that the CIA runs false flag operations. In fact they are *supposed* to run false flag operations. But they have switched their allegiance from the US to keeping the elites like Hillary and Barack Hussein in power.
Not that the CIA had to do much. When they couldn't disprove embarrassing leaks by wikileaks remember how they said anonymous sources claimed the hack was done by Russians. These people dont need the CIA...just a gullible public and a pliant media and the belief that if the Russians did it then the leaks couldnt possibly be true.
But not one wikileaks document was ever challenged. In fact most were authenticated by Google hash stamps. Turns out the Democrats were as vile and corrupt as we thought...no matter who brought it to light.
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.



Yup. How could there be transcripts and recordings of conversations to and from Trump Tower unless they were wiretapped?
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.



Yup. How could there be transcripts and recordings of conversations to and from Trump Tower unless they were wiretapped?

Post the transcripts that were obtained by illegal wiretapping perpetrated by Obama.

Post ONE.
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.

In your scenario, are you rejecting the possibility that the AMBASSADOR was under legal surveillance?
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.



Yup. How could there be transcripts and recordings of conversations to and from Trump Tower unless they were wiretapped?

Post the transcripts that were obtained by illegal wiretapping perpetrated by Obama.

Post ONE.
who was the president at the time of the wiretap? doesn't matter.
 
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.



Yup. How could there be transcripts and recordings of conversations to and from Trump Tower unless they were wiretapped?

Post the transcripts that were obtained by illegal wiretapping perpetrated by Obama.

Post ONE.

You Leftist Lie in here every phucking day.

Every day. Do you lie to your mother like that?

Liars are barred from heaven if any of you Lefties even believe in such a thing, so you'll have no excuse when you are booted from the Pearly Gates.

You all disgust me. Corrupt to the core.

But back to the point in question.

How does THE FBI review A PHONE call if THE PHONE CALL was not tapped?

FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit

The Washington Post Admits right here there were transcripts that were shared with them.
THAT IS FELONY ESPIONAGE.

Opinion | Why Flynn was undone by a phone call

After Flynn’s resignation, Trump says the ‘real story’ is ‘illegal leaks’

The Public Should Demand To See The Michael Flynn Transcript | Zero Hedge

Flynn's only mistake was waffling on telling PENCE immediately that he had a LEGAL and Inconsequential Call with an ambassador, a Russian one in particular. He had talked to about 30 other ones, all legit and LEGAL. Perhaps this one slipped his mind or he thought it was unimportant.

These are highly skilled generals not PETTY POLITICIANS. I bet Flynn had no idea that he would get screwed over such a minor thing.

Consider it a hard life lesson about how Ugly and Ruthless The Democrat Party is.
 
Last edited:
And now you know why Obama was spying on Trump for Hillary Clinton and why THE DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton.

They needed Hillary to win to keep the scam going.

What's your evidence that Obama was spying?
so ask yourself this one question, where was Flynn at when he was tapped talking to the russia ambassador? Trump Towers!!! D'OH. the evidence is in the report about Flynn...... everyone listen up, this justifies Trump's tweet.

In your scenario, are you rejecting the possibility that the AMBASSADOR was under legal surveillance?
well if it was him being tapped, then it would be a one way communication coming from the ambassador. D'OH screwed again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top